DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing the Evaluation Indicator of Pedestrian Environment for Promoting Walking Activity

걷기활동 증진을 위한 보행환경 평가지표의 개발

  • Park, Kyung-Hun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Changwon National University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Wan (Department of Landscape Architecturw, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jung, Sung-Gwan (Department of Landscape Architecturw, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • You, Ju-Han (Institute of Industrial Technology, Changwon National University)
  • Published : 2007.11.30

Abstract

The promotion of walking and bicycling is recently a hot topic in the urban planning and design field. Many planners have already examined the many components of the land use-transportation connection and built environment-physical activity link. A rapidly growing area of urban form research is to measure the level of walk-ability in urban environments. With this background, this research conducted a preliminary study to develop the evaluation indicators of pedestrian environments. Based on the literature reviews on walking or pedestrian environments, we proposed the seventeen indicators related with pedestrian facilities, road attributes and walking environment. We also performed a questionary survey to evaluate the satisfaction of their neighborhood pedestrian environments for 302 randomly selected adults living in the City of Changwon, Gyeongsangnam-do. Finally, this research provided the valid model to evaluate the effects of physical environmental factors on the walking satisfaction using factor analysis and multiple regression analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. 이인성, 김현옥, 1998, 도시주거지 보행경로 선택행태에 관한 연구: GIS를 이용한 보행환경 만족의 분석, 국토계획, 33(5), 117-129
  2. 김영임, 정혜선, 최숙자, 이창현, 2003, 직장인의 걷기운동에 대한 자기 효능감에 영향을 미치는 요인, 보건교육 . 건강증진학회지, 20(3), 255-267
  3. 이병주, 박상명, 남궁문, 2006, 감성데이터를 이 용한 보도환경의 경관평가에 관한 연구, 대한토목학회논문집, 26(2D), 265-273
  4. Cervero R., Kockelman K., 1997, Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity and design, Transportation Research, D2, 199-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(68)90016-6
  5. McNally M. G., Kulkarni A., 1997, Assessment of influence of land use-trasportation system on travel behavior, Transportation Research Record, 1607, 105-115 https://doi.org/10.3141/1607-15
  6. Srinivasan S., 2002, Quantifying spatial characteristics of cities, Urban Studies, 39(11), 2005-2028 https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000011335
  7. Clifton K. j., Livi A. D., 2004, Pedestrian Environment Data Scan(PEDS) Audit Protocol, University of Maryland
  8. Livi A. D., 2004, Audit Protocol: College Park Audit, University of North Carolina: 1-13
  9. Giles-Corti B., Timperio A., Cutt H., Pikora T., Bull F., Knuirnan M., Bulsara M., Van Niel K., Shilton T., 2006, Development of a reliable measure of walking within and outside the local neighbourhood: RESIDE's neighborhood physical activity questionnaire, Preventive Medicine, 42, 455-459 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.01.019
  10. Lee C., Moudon A. V., 2000, Physical activity and environment research in the health field: Implication for urban and transportation planning practice and research, Journal of Planning Literature, 19(2), 147-180 https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412204267680
  11. Lee C., 2004, Activity-friendly communities: Physical environmental determinants of walking and biking, and their policy, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Washington
  12. Moudon A.V., Lee C., 2003, Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments, American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 21-37 https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21
  13. Pikora T., Giles-Coni B., Bull F., Jamrozik K., Donova R., 2003, Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling, Social Science & Medicine, 56(8), 1693-1703 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6
  14. Pikora T. J.,, F. C. L. Bull, Jamrozik K, Knuiman M., Giles-Corti B., Donovan R. J., 2002, Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(3), 187-194 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
  15. Saelens B., Sallis J., Black J., Chen D., 2003, Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation, American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1552-1558 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
  16. Troped P. J., Ruth P. S., Russell R. P., Belinda R., John R. U., Shirley J. T., 2001, Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail, Preventive Medicine, 32(2), 191-200 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0788
  17. Kristopher J. Ackerson, 2005, A GIS Approach to evaluating streetscape and neighborhood walkability, Master Thesis, University of Oregon
  18. 大吉泰永 외 3인, 1997,'心理翠的評債構造によ る街路の調和性像測',日本建築學會計劃系論文 報告集,第502號
  19. 이상규, 2001, 도심 상업지역 가로 이용자 만족 요인 분석에 관한 연구, 석사학위논문, 건축공학과, 연세대학교, 서울
  20. 이상준, 2001, 광주광역시 보행환경의 일반적 특성 에 관한 조사연구, 환경 연구, 6(1), 11-21
  21. 탁형렬,2002, 일산신도시 보행자 전용도로의 이 용행태 및 만족도 평가, 석사학위논문, 조경학 , 성균관대학교, 서울
  22. 김용수, 김수봉, 강신용, 권기찬, 임원현, 조용기, 1997, 도시 Amenity 증진을 위 한 가로공간 개 성화에 관한 연구, 한국정원학회지, 16(1), 121-130
  23. 김정열, 1998, 도시환경 개선을 위한 가로시설물의 디자인에 관한 연구: 서울시 가로시설물 디 자인의 컨셉을 중심으로, 석사학위논문, 공예학과, 상명대학교, 서울
  24. 이영환, 한삼건, 1999, 경주 구시가지 상업지역 가로경관에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회 19(2),745- 750
  25. 심종혁, 2002, 가로환경의 만족도 분석을 통한 경관개선 방향에 관한 연구: 김해시 가락로의 가로변건축물을 중심으로, 석사학위논문, 건축공학과, 동아대학교, 부산
  26. 경기개발연구원, 20001 경기도 보행환경 개선방안, 207pp
  27. 한국조경학회,2003, 조경시 공학, 문운당, 598pp
  28. 조용현, 정용문, 김광동, 2006, 녹지량 지표로서 녹시율 개념을 도입한 서울시 가로 환경 특성 분석, 한국조경학회지, 34(1), 1-9

Cited by

  1. Comparing the environment for elderly pedestrians among different-sized cities of Gyeonggi province in Korea vol.18, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.863449