Determinants of Sterilization among Married Couples in Korea

우리나라 부부의 영구피임 결정요인

  • Kim, Ju-Hee (Cheil General Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Mi (Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University) ;
  • Suh, Moon-Hee (Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs) ;
  • Kang, Dae-Ryong (Clinical Trials Center, Yonsei University Health System) ;
  • Chung, Woo-Jin (Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2007.11.30

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to examine the determinants of sterilization in South Korea. Methods : This study was based on the data from the Korea National Fertility Survey carried out in the year 2000 by the Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs. The subjects of the analysis were 4,604 women and their husbands who were in their first marriage, in the age group of 15-49 years. The data were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results : Consistent with the findings of previous studies, the woman#s age and the number of total children increased the likelihood of sterilization. In addition, the year of marriage had a strong positive association with sterilization. Interestingly, the number of surviving sons tended to increase the likelihood of sterilization, whereas the woman#s education level and age at the time of marriage showed a negative association with sterilization. Religion, place of residence, son preference, and the husband#s education level, age and type of occupation were not significant determinants of sterilization. Conclusions : The sex of previous children and lower level of education are distinct determinants of sterilization among women in South Korea. More studies are needed in order to determine the associations between sterilization rate and decreased fertility.

Keywords

References

  1. The Korea National Statistical Office. Population Census. The Korea National Statistical Office; 2006
  2. Lee SS. The Cause of Low Fertulity and Prospective Policy. Health-Welfare Forum (111). Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2006, p. 5-17 (Korean)
  3. Baschieri A, Hinde A. The proximate determinants of fertility and birth intervals in Egypt: An application of calendar data. Demographic Res 2007; 16(3): 59-96 https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.3
  4. Kim SG, Cho AJ, Kim YK, Park SK, Lee GW. The National Research of Fertility and Family Health-welfare Status in 2003. Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2004 (Korean)
  5. Godecker AL, Thomson E, Bumpass LL. Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 2001; 33(1): 35-41 https://doi.org/10.2307/2673740
  6. Rajaram S, Sunil TS. Demographic significance of sterilization in three Indian state. Soc Sci J 2004; 41(4): 605-620 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2004.08.008
  7. United Nations Population Division. World Contraceptive Use 2001. New York: United Nations publication; 2002
  8. Warren CW, Westoff CF, Herold JM, Rochat RW, Smith JC. Contraceptive sterilization in Puerto Rico. Demography 1986; 23(3): 351-365 https://doi.org/10.2307/2061435
  9. Bumpass LL, Thomson E, Godecker AL. Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization. Fertil Steril 2000; 73(5): 937-946 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00484-2
  10. Suh MH, Cho DH. The Analysis on the Factors of Contraception and Methods; 1968-1991. Health Social Research Paper 13(1). Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 1993, p. 36-50 (Korean)
  11. Kim SG, Cho AJ, Lee SS, Kim YK. The National Research of Fertility and Family Health Status in 2000. Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2001 (Korean)
  12. Chung WJ, Lee KA, Lee SM. Effects of the late marriage of Korean women on the first birth interval. J Prev Med Public Health 2006; 39(3): 213-220 (Korean)