INTRODUCTION
Michael reaction1 is the nucleophilic addition of a carbanion, formed from compounds containing active methylene group to an alpha-beta unsaturated ketone2, ester1, nitrile3, etc. There is a general interest in the synthesis of bicyclic ketone because this structural unit is the main function of various natural fragments. It is a versatile intermediate in the synthesis of various steroids and hormones. A tandem reaction comprising a Michael addition step followed by an aldol condensation to produce a cyclic compound is Robinson annulation4-9. It is an useful method for the synthesis of natural products consisting of fused ring systems such as terpenes and alkaloids10. Robinson annulation can be performed under catalytic conditions using La(OiPr)3-MS 4A11, Al2O312, S-proline13, and AB38C214. Moreover, solvent-free Robinson annulation with sodium ethoxide15 was also performed. It can also be effected in onepot using acid catalysts16,17. In this paper, we report synthesis of some 5,7-diaryl-3,4,6-trihydronaphthalen-2-ones.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Some 5,7-diaryl-3,4,6-trihydronaphthalen-2-ones were synthesized from 3,5-diarylcyclohex-2-en-1-ones and methyl vinyl ketone in the presence of sodium ethoxide. The products were characterized on the basis of their IR, UV-visible, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and Mass spectral studies. To confirm the 1H and 13C NMR spectral assignments, HSQC spectrum was recorded for 5a and analyzed. All the spectral studies along with TLC indication bear evidence that the formed products are 5a-c. The compounds were isolated by column chromatography using petroleum ether-benzene (1:4) mixture as an eluent system. Attempts to isolate 3a-c and 4a-c were unsuccessful. The schematic representation describing the route of synthesis is furnished in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.Synthesis of some 5,7-diaryl-3,4,6-trihydronaphthalen-2-ones.
The IR-spectrum of 5a showed one strong carbonyl absorption at 1638 cm-1 assignable to a cyclic α,β-unsaturated ketone stretching frequency. The IR spectrum of 1a showed carbonyl absorption at 1653 cm-1. 5a is also a α,β-unsaturated ketone but it has a frequency of 1638 cm-1, which is lower than the stretching frequency of 1a, is due to extended conjugation.
In the GC-MS spectrum of 5a, the observed single peak confirms its formation as a sole product. In the mass spectrum the molecular ion peak observed at 298 is also an additional evidence for the formation of 5a. The other important fragment peaks are 270, 229, 144, 116, 115, 91, 76 and 54, which agree with the fragment pattern of 2-naphthol. The plausible fragmentation pattern is given in Chart 1.
Chart 1.Fragmentation pattern for 5,7-diphenyl-3,4,6-trihydronaphthalen-2-one.
The UV-visible spectrum of 5a shows two major absorptions at 248 nm and 288 nm. The λmax at 248 nm is due to π-π∗ transition of phenyl substituent. The other λmax at 288 nm may be due to the unsaturated ketone. The calculated λmax value 297 nm is almost equivalent to the observed λmax value. If the compound 5a is a saturated one, then the λmax value should be around 250 nm. But in the case under study λmax is 288 nm which is adequate confirmation of the fact that 5a is unsaturated.
The complete 1H and 13C NMR spectral assignments for the products 5a-c are given in the experimental section.
Analysis of HSQC Spectrum
To confirm the 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR signals of 5a, HSQC spectrum was recorded and is given in Plate 1. It shows eight cross peaks, which are analyzed as follows: The cross peaks 1 and 2 reveal that the protons are connected to carbon signal at 36 ppm. The signal for the C-4 carbon appears as two signals at 3 and 2.9 ppm. The third cross peak is connected to a carbon signal at 41.5 ppm. C-3 carbon, which appeared at 41.5 ppm, is connected to proton at 3.4 ppm. Hence the signal at 3.4 ppm is conveniently assigned to H-3 proton.
The fourth cross peak is connected to a carbon signal at 44.3 ppm, which is connected to C-6 carbon and two proton signals at 2.9 and 2.7 ppm. Hence the signals at 2.9 and 2.7 ppm are assigned to two H-6 protons.
The fifth cross peak is connected to 7.01 ppm of 1H signal and 113.6 ppm of 13C signal. The seventh cross peak is connected to 6.47 ppm of 1H signal and 125.4 ppm of 13C signal. The fifth and seventh cross peaks may be due to C-8 and C-1 carbons and its protons respectively. The proton signals at 7.01 and 6.47 ppm are assigned to H-1 and H-8, respectively. The eighth cross peak appears as a cluster that is connecting the carbon signals at aromatic region and its protons.
Plate 1.
Experimental Section
Melting points of the compounds were recorded on an electro-thermal apparatus and are uncorrected. IR-spectra in KBr were recorded in NICOLET AVATAR-330-FT-IR spectrophotometer. UVvisible spectrum was recorded on HITACHI-U-2001 double beam spectrophotometer. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on BRUKER AMX-400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz. 13C NMR spectra were recorded on BRUKER AMX-400 spectrometer at operating frequency 100 MHz. The mass spectra were recorded on VG-MICROMASS-7070F double mass spectrometer. The HSQC was recorded on BRUKER AMX-400 spectrometer. The purity of the compounds was checked on TLC.
The chalcones were prepared according to the literature18. 3,5-Diaryl-cyclohex-2-en-1-ones [1a-c] were prepared by adopting the literature procedure19.
Preparation of 5,7-Diaryl-3,4,6-trihydronaphthalen-2-one 5a:
A solution of sodium ethoxide was prepared from 0.01 g of freshly cut sodium and 10 ml ethanol in a round-bottomed flask. To this, 3,5-Diphenylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (0.248 g) 1a in absolute ethanol (20 ml) was added and stirred for one hour at room temperature. To this mixture methyl vinyl ketone (0.1 ml) in absolute alcohol (10 ml) was added and the stirring was continued for over night. To the reaction mixture, 100 ml of CHCl3 followed by ice water were added. The organic phase was separated, washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The residue, obtained after evaporation of the solvent was subjected to column chromatography using petroleum ether-benzene (1:4) as an eluent mixture to afford 5a. Yield: 55%; m.p. 96-98˚C; MS: C22H18O; m/z: 298 (M+•), 270, 229, 144, 116, 115, 102, 91, 76, 52; IR cm-1: 3052, 1638, 1590, 1573, 1495, 1446, 761, 697; UV nm: 248, 288; 1H NMR, CDCl3, δ ppm: 2.60-2.78 (m, 2H, H6); 2.83-2.91 (m, 1H, H4a); 3.01 (dd, 1H, H4e); 3.36-3.44 (m, 2H, H3); 6.47 (s, 1H, H1); 7.01 (s, 1H, H8); 7.21-7.56 (m, 10H, Ar-H’s); 13C-NMR, CDCl3 δ ppm: 200.2 (C-2); 159.7 (C-7); 157.2 (C-5); 113.6 (C-8); 125.4 (C-1); 44.3 (C-6); 41.5 (C-3); 36.7 (C-4); 138.7-143.7 (C-9, C-10 and two ipso carbons); 125.4-130.7 Ar-C’s.
Compounds 5b and 5c were synthesized similarly.
5-(4'-Methylphenyl)-7-phenyl-3,4,6-trihydronaphthalen-2-one 5b:
Yield: 50%; m.p.: 102-104°C; MS: C23H20O; m/z: 312 (M+•), 284, 243, 144, 116, 115, 102, 91, 76, 52; IR cm-1: 3050, 2973, 1630, 1585, 1570, 1490, 1440, 1375, 756, 693; 1H NMR, CDCl3, δ ppm: 2.62-2.88 (m, 2H, H6), 3.02 (dd, 1H, H4e), 2.86-2.99 (m, 2H, H4a), 3.38-3.49 (m,2H,H3), 2.40 (s, 3H, CH3 at phenyl ring), 6.52 (s, 1H, H1), 7.08 (s, 1H, H8); 7.60-7.24 (m, 10H, Ar-H’s); 13C NMR CDCl3 δ ppm: 124.5 (C-1); 201.4 (C-2); 42.1 (C-3); 37.3 (C-4); 160.3 (C-5); 44.5 (C-6); 157.8 (C-7); 114.1 (C-8); 21.5 (CH3 at Phenyl ring); 137.6 (C-CH3); 139.2-144.2 (C-9, C-10 and two ipso carbons); 129.7-125.9 (Ar-C’s).
5-(4'-Methoxyphenyl)-7-phenyl-3,4,6-trihydronaphthalen-2-one 5c:
Yield: 52%; m.p.: 106-108°C; MS: C23H20O2; m/z: 328 (M+•), 300, 259, 144, 116, 115, 102, 91, 76, 52.; IR cm-1: 3042, 1632, 1587, 1572, 1492, 1446, 1265, 1248, 759, 695; 1H NMR CDCl3 δ ppm: 2.55-2.72 (m, 2H, H6), 2.78-2.85 (m, 2H, H4a), 2.97 (dd, 1H, H4e), 3.31-3.38 (m, 2H, H3), 3.95 (s, 3H, OCH3 at phenyl ring); 6.41 (s, 1H, H-1), 7.12 (s, 1H, H8) 7.10-7.56 (m, 9H, Ar-H’s); 13C NMR CDCl3 δ ppm: 200.9 (C-2); 124.7 (C-1); 41.0 (C-3); 36.2 (C-4); 159.3 (C-5); 43.9 (C-6); 55.4 (OCH3 at phenyl ring); 156.7 (C-7); 113.9 (C-8); 143.1-138.1 (C-9, C-10 and two ipso carbons); 159.2 (C-OCH3); 124.9-128.9 (Ar-C’s).
References
- Michael, J. J. Perakt, Chem. 1887, 35, 251
- Kohler, A. Am. Chem. J. 1907, 37, 385 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02271a016
- Vorlander, S. Ann. 1902, 66, 320
- Du Feu, E. C.; Mc Quillin, F. J.; Robinson, R. J. Chem. Soc. 1937, 53
- Balasubramanian, K.; John, J. P.; Swaminathan, S. Synthesis 1974, 51
- Bergmann, E. D.; Gingberg, D.; Pappo, R. Org. React. 1959, 10, 179
- Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis: Selectivity, Strategy and Efficiency in Modern Organic Chemistry, Pergamonn Press, New York; 1991, 2, 4.
- Rapson, W. S.; Robinson, R. J. Chem. Soc. 1935, 1285.
- Ramachandran, S.; Newmann, M. S. Organic Synthesis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc; New York, 1973, 5, 486
- Ho, L.C. Carbocycle Construction in Terpene Synthesis, VCH Publishers Inc; NewYork, 1988
- Okano, T.; Satou, Y.; Tamura, M.; Kiji, J. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70, 1879 https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.70.1879
- Takatori, K.; Nakayama, M.; Yamada, N.; Hirayam, S.; Kasiwara, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 4, 455
- Rajagopal, D.; Narayanan, R.; Swaminathan, S. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.), 2001, 113, 197 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704070
- Zhong, G.; Hoffmann, T.; Lerner, R. A.; Danishefsky, S.; Barbas, C. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8131 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja970944x
- Miyamoto, H.; Kanetaka, S.; Tanaka, K.; Yoshizawa; Toyota, S.; Toda, F. Chem. Lett. 2000, 888
- Heathcock, C. H.; Ellis, J. E.; Mc Murry; Cappolino, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12, 4995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)97609-9
- Heathcock, C. H.; Mahaim, C.; Schlecht, M. F.; Utawanit, T. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3264 https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00192a004
- Furniss, B. S.; Hannaford, A. J.; Smith, P. G.; Tatchell, A. R. Vogel's textbook of practical organic chemistry' 5th ed. ELBS, 1997, 1033
- Balasubramanian, M.; Souza, A. D. Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 5399 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96334-3
Cited by
- Synthesis and anticandidiasis activity of novel (2E)-ethyl-2-(2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)hydrazono)-4(naphthalen-2-yl)-6-arylcyclohex-3-ene carboxylates vol.44, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-010-0437-2