A Study on Setting up Conservation Areas through Habitat Value Assessment of Developing Area

개발예정지역에서의 서식지 가치평가를 통한 보전지역 설정에 관한 연구

  • Park, Yong-Su (School of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Heui (Ecological Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Dong-Gil (Ecological Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Kwi-Gon (Ecological Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
  • 박용수 (서울대학교 산림과학부) ;
  • 김대희 (서울대학교 생태조경학과) ;
  • 조동길 (서울대학교 생태조경학과) ;
  • 김귀곤 (서울대학교 생태조경학과)
  • Received : 2006.04.29
  • Accepted : 2006.05.21
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

For both a healthy environment and sustainable development, we frame a habitat assessment method, concerning biodiversity and physical characteristics. With the method, we set up and extract conservation areas from Peace Valley Resort Development Areas which can function as habitats. Absolute and relative assessment items which are the size of area, habitation of species with conservation value, distribution of communities, functions of habitats, ratio of non-native plants, connectivity of habitats, vegetation layers of forests and age of forests, and water systems are considered on newly extracted conservation areas, and the habitat value assessment was calculated on the items in a 3-point scale. By comparing and examining 3 existing proposals for extracted conservation areas, we assess existing proposals, make an alternative proposal, and try to verify the possibility of applicability to extracted conservation areas. Proposal A and C must not be adopted since almost all conservation areas would be developed in the proposals. Proposal B, consisting of 53% development areas and 47% non-development areas, does not have enough development areas, so high density building arrangements should be encouraged in order to preserve conservation areas. Therefore, proposal B would be the best in ecological terms among the 3 proposals, if 3 conditions are considered : 1) new extracted conservation areas should be conserved; 2) 10~15m wide green-zones on both sides of the water system, which can play a role as ecological corridors, should be considered in development areas; 3) building arrangement should not interrupt the ecological corridors.

Keywords