Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Biomechanical Evaluation of New Walking-shoes

신 워킹 전문화의 생체역학적 기능성 평가

  • Published : 2006.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to analysis the kinematic and kinetic differences between new walking shoe(NWS : RYN) and general walking shoe(GWS). The subjects for this study were 10 male adults who had the walking pattern of rearfoot shrike with normal foot. The movement of one lower leg was measured using plantar pressure and Vicon Motion Analysis Program(6 MX13 and 2 MX40 cameras : 100 f / s) while the subjects walked at the velocity(1.5m/s. on 2m).. The results of this study was as follows : 1. The NWS was better than the GWS that caused injuries such as adduction, abduction and pronation are reduced While walking on a perpendicular surface, the landing angle and the knees angles were extensive which makes walking more safe which reduces anxiety and uneasiness. 2. The bottom of the NWS were now made into a more circular arch which supports the weight of the body and reduces the irregular angles when wearing GWS. This arch made the supporting area more wide which made the upholding the trunk of the body more effective. The whole bottom of the foot that supports the weight is more flexible in addition, increases the safeness of walking patterns and the momentum of the body. 3. The moment the heel of the foot of the NWS touch the ground, the range of the pressure were partially notable and the range of the pressure on the upper part of the thigh were dispersed The injuries that occurred while walking. primary factors when a shock related injuries are reduced Judgements of the impacts of the knees and the spinal column dispersing could be made.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽차수, 이계산, 김희석(2003). 신발의 무게가 보행효율에 미치는 영향. 한국체육학회지, 제42권 3호, pp.677-686.
  2. 최규정, 권희자(2003). 보행용 전문신발과 일반 운동화의 운동역학적 비교 분석. 한국운동역학회지, 제13권 2호, pp.161-173.
  3. Arangio, G A, Chen, C, & Salathe, E P. (1998). Effect of varying arch height with and without the plantar fascia on the mechanical properties of the foot. Foot and Ankle, 19(10), 705-709 https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079801901010
  4. Bates, B. T., James, S. L, Osternig, L R, Sawhill, J. A, & Harrill, J. (1981). Effects of running shoes on ground reaction forces. In A Marecki, K Fidelus, K Kedzior & A Wit (Eds.), Biomechanics XII-B (pp. 226-233). Baltimore: University
  5. Broody, D. M (1980). Running injuries. Clinical Symposia, 32(4), 2-36
  6. Cavangh, P. R, & Lafortune, M A (1980). Ground reaction forces in distance running. Journal of Biomechanics, 15, 397-406
  7. Clement, D. B., Tauton, J. E, Smart, G W, & McNicol, K L, (1981). A survey of runner's overuse injuries. Physician and Sports Medicine, 9, 47-58.
  8. Eng, J. & Pierrynowski, M R(1994). The effect of soft foot orthotics on three-dimensional lower-limb kinematics during walking and running. Physical Theraphy, 74(9), 836-844
  9. Frederick, E. C, Clarke, T. E, & Hamill C. L. (1983). shoe design and rearfoot control in running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 15(2), 176.
  10. Gross, M L & Napoli, R C (1993). Treatment of lower extremity injuries with orthotic shoe inserts Sports Medicine, 15(1), 66-70 https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199315010-00006
  11. Hartsell, H. D., & Spaulding, S. J. (1997). Effectiveness of external orthotic support on passive soft tissue resistance of the chronically nically unstable ankle. Foot Ankle International,18 (3), 144-150 https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079701800306
  12. Hicks, J. H (1954). The mechnics of the foot II. The plantar aponeurosis and the arch Journal of Anatomy, 88, 25-31.
  13. Inmam, V. T. (1976). Joint of the ankle. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkiris.
  14. James, S. L, Bates, B. T, & Osternig, L R (1978). Injuries to runners. American Journal of sports Medicine, 6, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354657800600202
  15. Lorenzon, R- (1988). Prevention and management of sports injuries-intrinsic factor. In A Dirix, H. G. Knuttgen, & K TMe(Ed), The Olympic Book of Sports Medicine(pp.376-390). London: Blackwell Science Publication
  16. Minn, R A (1982). Biomechanics of running. In R P. Mack(Ed), The Foot and Leg in Running (pp.1-29). London: C V. Mosby Company.
  17. Nigg, B. M (1986). Biomechanics of Running Shoes. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics.
  18. Nigg, B. M (1988). Prevention and management of sports injuries - extrinsic factor. In A Dirix, H. G. Knuttgen, & K Tittle(Ed), The Olympic Book of Sports Medicine(pp. 363-375).
  19. Nigg, B. M & Bahlsen, H. A (1988). The inflence of heel flare and midsole construction on pronation, supination and impact forces for heel-toe running. International Journal of sports Biomechanics, 4, 205-219.
  20. Nigg, B. M Herzog, W, & Read, L J. (1988). Effcts of viscoelastic shoe insole on vertical impact forces in heel-toe running. The American Journal of Sports Medicine,16, 70-76 https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658801600113
  21. Nigg, B. M, Khan, A Fisher, V., & Stefanyshyn, D. (1998). Effectiveness of external orthotic support on passive soft tissue resistance of the chronically unstable ankle. Medidne and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30(4), 550-555
  22. Nigg, B. M., Nurse, M A, & Stefanyshyn, D. J. (1990). Shoe inserts and orthotics ankle, Medicine and Science in sports and Exercise, 31, 7(suppl), s421-s428.
  23. Schwellnus, M P., Jordan, G, & Nokes, T. D. (1990). Prevention of common overused injuries by the use of shock absorbing insoles. American Orthopaedic Society for sports Medidne,18, (6), 636-641.
  24. Thordarsorv D. B., Kumar, P. J., Hedman, T. P. & Ebramzadeh, E. (1997). Effect of partial versus complete plantar fasciotomy on the windlass mechanism Foot and Ankle, 18(1), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079701800104

Cited by

  1. Medial Longitudinal Arch Balanced Analysis of the Calibration vol.8, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2014.8.2.51
  2. The Effect of Form and Hardness of Outsoles on the Motion of the Lower Extremity Joints and on Foot Pressure during Gait vol.21, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2011.21.2.223