DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Application Strategies of the FRBR Model: Focused on Foreign Countries

FRBR모형의 적용 전략에 관한 연구 - 해외 사례를 중심으로 -

  • 이성숙 (충남대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2006.09.01

Abstract

FRBR(Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) that is conceptual model of bibliographic universal is increased its value because of spreading digital libraries. This research investigates application strategies of the FRBR model, For the study 7 foreign application cases are analyzed. Especially focused on the reason of adoption and method of the entities in the first group of the FRBR model. The result of this research could be the basic resources for study and implementation of the FRBR Model.

서지세계의 개념모형인 FRBR은 디지털도서관의 확산으로 그 유용성이 더 증대되고 있다. 이 연구의 목적은 FRBR 모형의 적용 전략을 살펴보기 위한 것이다. 이 연구에서는 해외 적용사례를 대상으로 FRBR 모형의 채택 이유와 FRBR 제1집단 개체의 수용방법을 살펴보았다. 이 연구 결과는 FRBR모형에 대한 연구 및 구현의 활성화를 위해 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김태수. 1999. '목록의 이해'. 서울: 한국도서관협회
  2. 이성숙. 2005. 'FRBR 모형의 수용에 관한 연구'. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과
  3. Amato, G., C. Gennaro, P. Savino. 2002. Indexing and Editing metadata for documentary films on line: the ECHO Digital Library. [cited 2005.]
  4. Amato, G., D. Astelli, S. Isani, P. Venerosi, P. Poncin, and L. Vinet. 2000. Metadata Modelling Report. [cited 2002. 5. 10].
  5. Associazione Italiana Biblioteche(AIB). 2000. Seminario su FRBR(Functional requirements for bibliographic records). [cited 2002. 5. 10].
  6. Ayres, Marie-Louise, K. Fitch, A. Scarvell, and K. Kerry. 2001. AustLit: a gateway on steroids. [cited 2004. 11. 29].
  7. Bennett, R., B. F. Lavoie, and E. T. O’Neill. 2003. 'The Concept of a Work in WorldCat: an Application of FRBR.' Library collections, acquisitions, and technical services. 27(1). [cited 2004. 1. 12].
  8. Boeuf, Patrick Le. 2001. 'FRBR and Further.' CCQ, 32(4): 15-47
  9. Boeuf, Patrick Le. 2005. Brave New FRBR World. [cited 2006. 2. 5].
  10. Byrum, John D. 2000. The Birth and Re-birth of the ISBDs: Process and Procedures for Creating and Revising the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions. [cited 2003. 11. 25].
  11. Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access(CC:DA). 2002. FRBR Terminology. Incorporating FRBR Terminology into AACR: Review of 4JSC/Chair/76/Chair follow-up. [cited 2003. 10. 18].
  12. Fitch, K. 2000. ALEG Data Model - Inventory. [cited 2004.10.5].
  13. Hemmasi, Harriette. 2004. Why Not MARC? [cited 2006. 2. 17].
  14. Hetherington, Carol. 2003. From citation to context and beyond: crossing bibliographic boundaries in the Electronic Age. [cited 2004. 10. 20].
  15. Hickey, T. B., and J. Toves. 2003. FRBR Work-Set Algorithm. [cited 2004. 1. 11].
  16. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : final report. IFLA Study Gruop in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Munchen : Saur. [cited 2002. 6.15].
  17. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 2003. 서지레코드의 기능상의 요건. 김태수 역. 서울: 국립중앙도서관
  18. Minibayeva, N., Dunn, Jon W. 2004. A digital library data model for music. [cited 2006. 3. 15].
  19. Notess, M. Riley, J. and Hemmasi, H. 2004. From Abstract to Virtual Entities: Implementation of Work-Based Searching in a Multimedia Digital Library. [cited 2005. 11. 2].
  20. Nuys, Carol van, and Ketil Albertsen. 2003. Identification of Network Accessible Documents: Problem Areas and Suggested Solutions. [cited 2006. 2. 5].
  21. Nuys, Carol van, Ketil Albertsen, Linda Pedersen, and Stenstad, Asborg. 2004. The Paradigma Project and its quest for metadata solutions and services. [cited 2006.1.4].
  22. Pinedo, Isa de, and A. Petrucciani. 2002. 'Un Approccio All’applicazione del Modello FRBR alle Regole di Catalogazione Italiane: Problemi e Possibili Soluzioni.' Bolletino AIB, 42(3): 267-278. [cited 2003. 9. 25].
  23. Proffitt, Merrilee. 2004. RedLightGreen: FRBR between a rock and a hard place. [cited 2005. 10. 22].
  24. Rust, G., and M. Bide. 2000. The INDECS metadata framework: principles, model and data dictionary. [cited 2006. 1. 21].
  25. Schulz, Nathalie. 2006. RDA: Resource Description and Access. [cited 2006. 4. 1].
  26. Snijder, R. 2001. Metadata Standards and Information Analysis: a Survey of Current Metadata Standards and the Underlying Models. [cited 2003. 8. 19].
  27. Svenonius, Elaine, 2000. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. MIT Press
  28. Tillett, Barbara B. 1987. Bibliographic Relationships: Toward a Conceptual Structure of Bibliographic Information Used in Catalog. Los Angles: University of California. 재인용: 김태수, 목록에서의 서지적관계와 연결구조에 대한 연구. 文獻情報學論叢, 李載喆敎授 定年紀念論文集(서울: 九美貿易, 1994), 46
  29. Tillett, Barbara B. 2001. 'Bibliographic Relationships,' Relationships in the organization of knowledge. chapter 2. edited by Carol A. Bean and Green Rebecca. Kluwer Academic Publishers: 19-35
  30. Tillett, Barbara B. 2002. The FRBR Model, ALA ALCTS CCS CC : DA. [cited 2003. 5. 1]