Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE EFFECT OF SMEAR LAYER TREATMENT ON THE MICROLEAKAGE

Smear layer 처리에 따른 미세누출에 대한 연구

  • Lee, Jung-Min (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of KyungHee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of KyungHee University) ;
  • Choi, Gi-Woon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of KyungHee University)
  • 이정민 (경희대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상혁 (경희대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최기운 (경희대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2006.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of root canal obturation with or without the treatment of smear layer. Eighty extracted human teeth with one canal were selected Instrumentation was performed with crown-down technique. After instrumentation, root canals of the NaOCl group and NaOCl-6 group were irrigated with 3% NaOCl. EDTA group and EDTA-6 group were irrigated with 17% EDTA. Then all teeth were obturated using continuous wane obturation technique NaOCl group and EDTA group were immersed in methylene blue solution for 84hours. NaOCl-6 group and EDTA-6 group were immersed in methylene blue solution for 6months. The teeth were sectioned at 1.5 mn (Level 1), 3.0 mm (Level 2) and 4.5 mm (Level 3) from the root apex. The length of dye-penetrated inter-face and the circumferential length of canal at each level were measured using Sigma-Scan Pro 5.0. 1. The mean leakage ratio was decreased cervically. 2. NaOCl group showed higher mean leakage ratio than EDTA group at each level. But there was significant difference at level 1 only (p < 0.05). 3. NaOCl-6 group showed higher mean leakage ratio than EDTA-6 group at each level. But there was significant difference at level 1 only (p < 0.05). 4. NaOCl-6 group showed higher mean leakage ratio than NaOCl group at each level. But there was significant difference at level 1 only (p < 0.05). 5. EDTA-6 group showed higher mean leakage ratio than EDTA group at each level. But there was no significant difference. 6. In NaOCl group and NaOCl-6 group, scanning electron micrographs of tooth sections generally covered with smear layer. In EDTA group and EDTA-6 group, tooth sections showing the penetration of sealers to opened dentinal tubules. The results suggest that removal of smear layer was effective to reduce the apical microleakage of the root canal.

본 연구는 도말층 제거 여부에 따른 근관 밀폐효과를 평가하기 위해 단근관 치아를 3% NaOCl 하에서 Ni-Ti file을 이용하여 crown-down법으로 근관 형성 후 최종세정제로 NaOCl을 사용한 군과 EDTA를 사용한 군, 6개월 보관한 NaOCl-6군과 EDTA-6군으로 분류하였다. Continuous wave법으로 근관 충전 시행 후 색소 침투를 시행한 다음 해부학적 근첨에서 1.5 mm (Level 1), 3.0 mm (Level 2), 4.5 mn (Level 3)에서 수평절단 하여 누출률을 측정하였다. 1. 모든 실험군에서 평균 누출률은 치근단부에서 치경부로 갈수록 감소하였다. 2. NaOCl군의 누출률이 EDTA 군보다 level 1 2, 3에서 높게 나타났으나 level 1에서만 통계학적 유의차를 보였다 (p < 0.05). 3. NaOCl-6군의 누출률이 EDTA-6 군보다 Level 1, 2, 3에서 높게 나타났으나 level 1에서만 통계학적 유의차를 보였다 (p < 0.05). 4. NaOCl-6군의 누출률이 NaOCl군에 비해 Level 1, 2, 3에서 증가하였으나 level 1에서만 통계학적 유의차를 보였다 (p < 0.05). 5. EDTA-6군의 누출률이 EDTA 군에 비해 Level 1, 2, 3에서 증가하였으나 통계학적 유의차는 없었다. 6. 주사전자현미경 관찰 결과 NaOCl 군과 NaOCl-6 군은 도말층이 제거되지 않아 상아세관내로 sealer 및 근관충전재가 침투하지 못한 반면, EDTA 군과 EDTA-6 군에서는 도말층이 제거되고 상아세관내로의 sealer와 근관충전재의 침투가 관찰되었다. 이상의 연구결과 EDTA를 이용하여 도말층을 제거한 경우 근관충전 즉시와 6개월 후 치근단 1/3 부위의 근단부 미세누출을 감소시킬 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume flush with several irrigating solutions. Part 3. J Endod 9(4):137-142, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80032-6
  2. Gutmann JL, Witherspoon DE. Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed., Mosby Inc., St. Louis, Mo. p272, 1998
  3. Ingle JI, Backland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed, BC Decker Inc. Loma Linda, California. p503-505, 2002
  4. Russell AD, Hugo WB, Ayliffe GAJ. Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation, and Sterilization. 3rd ed., Blackwell Science, Malden, MA. p99-100, 1999
  5. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 28(1):17-19, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200201000-00004
  6. Lee JK. Choi GW. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on removal of smear layer in the root canal system. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2006(In Press) https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.3.169
  7. Cergneux M, Ciucchi B, Dietschi JM, Holz J. The influence of the smear layer on the sealing ability of canal obturatiion. Int Endod J 20(5);228-232, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00619.x
  8. White RR, Goldman M, Lin P. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by plastic filling materials. J Endod 10(12);558-562, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80100-4
  9. Drake D. R, Wiemann A. H, Rivera E. M and Walton R. E. Bacterial retention in canal walls in vitro: effect of smear layer. J Endod 20(2);78-82, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81186-6
  10. Goldman LB, Goldman M, Kronman JH, Lin PS. The efficacy of several irrigating solutions for endodontics: A scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 52(2):197-204, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(81)90319-4
  11. Walters MJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Efficacy of Irrigation with Rotary Instrumentation. J Endod 28(12):837-839, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200212000-00011
  12. Cunningham WT, Balekjian AY. Effect of temperature on collagen- dissolving ability of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 49(2):175-177, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(80)90313-8
  13. Berutti E, Marini R. A Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Debridement Capability of Sodium Hypochlorite at Different Temperatures. J Endod 22(9):467-470, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80079-3
  14. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four oot canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 13(4):147-157, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80132-2
  15. Czonstkowsky M, Michanowicz A, Vazquez JA: Evaluation of an injection of thermoplasticized lowtemperature gutta-percha using radioactive isotopes, J Endod 11(2):71-74, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80122-9
  16. Tucker JW, Mizrahi S, Seltzer S: Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solutions: Urea, Tublicid Red, and Tubulicid Blue, J Endod 2(3):71-78, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(76)80200-2
  17. Williams S, Goldman M. Penetrability of the smeared layer by strain of proteus vulgaris. J Endod 11(9):385- 388, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80026-1
  18. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl 3:13-29, 1984
  19. Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings or experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 6(4):142- 149, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1990.tb00409.x
  20. Love RM, Chandler NP, Jenkinson HF. Penetration of smeared or non smeared dentine by Streptococcus gordonii. Int Endod J 29(1):2-12, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01353.x
  21. Ruddle CJ. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed., Mosby Inc., St. Louis, Mo, p258, 2002
  22. Hand RE, Smith ML, Harrison JW. Analysis of the effect of dilution on the necrotic tissue dissolution property of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 4(2):60-64, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(78)80255-6
  23. Patterson SS. In vivo and in vitro studies of the effect of the disodium salt of ethylenediamine tetra-acetate on human dentine and its endodontic implications. Oral surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 16:83-103, 1963 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(63)90367-0
  24. Goldman M, Goldman LB, Cavaleri R, Bogis J, Lin PS. The efficacy of several endodontic irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopic study: part 2, J Endod 8(11):487-492, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80073-3
  25. Grawehr M, Sener B, Waltimo T, Zehnder M. Interactions of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with sodium hypochlorite in aqueous solutions. Int Endod J 36(6):411-415, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00670.x
  26. Tamse A, Katz A and Kablan F. Comparison of apical leakage shown by four different dyes with two evaluating methods. Int Endod J 31(5):333-337, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00154.x
  27. Madison S, Krell KV. Comparison of EDTA and sodium hypochlirite on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 10(10):499-503, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80208-3
  28. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. The effect of smear layer upon the coronal leakage of gutta-percha root fillings and a glass ionomer sealer. Int Endod J 25(5):145- 149, 1992
  29. Syngcuk Kim. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed., Mosby Inc., St. Louis, Mo, p707-708, 2002

Cited by

  1. The effect of MTAD as a final root canal irrigants on the coronal bacterial leakage of obturated root canals vol.33, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.4.397
  2. Effect of soft chelating irrigation on the sealing ability of GP/AH Plus root fillings vol.34, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.484