Re-reading Chuncheon G5 International Design Competition from a Viewpoint of Landscape Urbanism

랜드스케이프 어바니즘의 관점으로 본 춘천 G5 국제설계경기 출품작 분석

  • Published : 2006.08.01

Abstract

A city evolves over time. It grows, transforms, and sometimes degrades. Chuncheon is at a turning point from a city souggling with regulations regarding clean water supply and a military encampment to a masterpiece city with a sustainable vision. The city is getting ready to restructure itself to become a world-famous culture and tourism complex expanding its physical boundary across the Camp Page site and absorbing Jungdo as a major tourist attraction. The landscape in the future blueprint of Chuncheon will play a great role in restructuring urban form. The regenerated in will have a new networked open space system as well as re-evaluated landscape resources. The hybrid theoretical practice called 'landscape urbanism' burgeoning in the fields between 'landscape architecture' and 'urbanism' can guide us in considering the terms of the relationship between a city and landscape when we design a future city Landscape urbanism is considered to be an effective framework by which we can diagnose the current status of a landscape in our contemporary urban design practice in Korea. This paper tries to provide a different perspective from the viewpoint of landscape urbanism to decipher the hidden implications of the social agreement on the role of landscape in urban structure by re-reading eight design proposals presented for the ChunCheon G5 international design competition based on the main principles of landscape urbanism. The G5 design competition is a great opportunity to test out new ideas on a city, demonstrating the relative values among various urban-design professional realms. First, this paper provides an overview of the main ideas of landscape urbanism based on the literature review and case studies. Second, framework categories are suggested in order to extract the explicit and implicit ideas on the landscape. Third, eight proposals are reviewed according to the suggested categories to situate the current landscape design of Korea within the mainstream of contemporary practice of landscape urbanism. Based on the review of eight proposals, the following diagnostic conclusions are made; first, the ideas of landscape urbanism have not been actively introduced in large-scaled urban landscape projects in Korea like Chuncheon G5. Second, it remains to be a big task for landscape professions to be able to participate in design consortiums on an equal footing. Third, In order to introduce and reify the ideas of landscape urbanism in Korea, it is inevitable and critical to test the ideas in both academic fields and professional practices to find the appropriately adjusted model of landscape urbanism.

Keywords

References

  1. 강원도개발공사(2005a) 춘천 G5 프로젝트 문화관광 복합지구조성사업 국제현상공모 설계지침서
  2. 강원도개발공사(2005b) 춘천 G5 프로젝트 추진계획
  3. 김석철(2005) 희망의 한반도 프로젝트. 서울: (주)창비
  4. 김아연(2005) 브리지파크국제설계경기에 나타난 현대 조경설계의 경향, 한국조경학회지 33(5): 18-30
  5. 김정은 엮음(2005) 행정중심복합도시 도시개념 국제공모. Space 457: 146-169
  6. 배정한(2004) 현대조경설계의 이론과 쟁점. 성남: 도서출판 조경
  7. 송유진, 조정송 (2006) 포토몽타주와 현대 조경 설계의 표현적 경향. 한국조경학회 2006 춘계 학술논문발표회 초록집. pp. 34-38
  8. 신근혜(2004) 환경설계의 다이어그램적 설계사고에 관한 연구. 다운스뷰공원 설계경기의 사례를 중심으로, 서울시립대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  9. 임선영(2006) 맵핑의 실험, 환경과 조경 219: 114-117
  10. 정욱주, 제임스 코너 (2005) 프레쉬 킬스 공원 조경설계. 한국조경학회지 33(1): 93-108
  11. Allen, S.(1998) Diagrams Matter. New York: Anyone Corporation
  12. Bums, C. and A. Kahn(2005) Why site matters. In C. Bums and A Kahn. eds., Site Matters. New York: Routledge. pp. vii-xxix
  13. Corner, J.(1999) The agency of mapping: speculation critique and invention In D. Cosgrove ed., Mappings. London: Reaktion Books Ltd. pp. 214-252
  14. Corner, J.(2003) Landscape urbanism In M. Mostafavi and C. Najile. eds., Landscape Urbanism London: AA Publication. pp. 58-63
  15. Eisenman, P.(1999) Diagram Diaries. New York: Universe Publishing
  16. Koolhaas, R. M. Bruce. and H. Werlemann(1997) S.M.L.XL (2nd ed.) New York: Monacelli Press
  17. Kilooyne. M. C.(2004) On reading MacKinnon Woods. Journal of Architectural Education 57(3): 18-23 https://doi.org/10.1162/104648804772745210
  18. Mathur. A and D. Cunha.(2001) Mississippi Flood: Designing a Shifting Landsape. New Haven: Yale University Press
  19. Meyer, E.(2005) Site citation. In C, Bums and A Kahn. eds., Site Matters. New York: Routledge. pp. 93-129
  20. http://www.chuncheon.go.kr/
  21. http://www.edaw.com
  22. http://www.g5project.co.kr
  23. http://www.pdp.ca