DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건강도시지표 비교를 통한 건강도시 수준의 평가 -한국, 일본 및 영국의 일부 도시를 중심으로-

An assessment of healthy city level by comparing health city index - Comparisons among the selected cities of Korea, Japan and England -

  • 남은우 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 보건행정학과) ;
  • 박재성 (고신대학교 의료경영학부) ;
  • 송예리아 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 보건행정학과)
  • Nam Eun-Woo (Department of Health Administration College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park Jae-Sung (Department of Health Care management, Kosin University) ;
  • Song Yea-Li-A (Department of Health Administration College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01

초록

The purpose of this study was to assess healthy city level of the selected cities of Korea, Japan, and England using healthy city index. Based on WHO health city profile, this study proposed 5 index domains comprised with human biology, life style, shelthe & socioeconomic data, environmental & infrastructural data, and public health policy and services. We identified 6 cities (Changwon, Wonju, Seoul, Ichikawa, Fukuroi and Brighton). The human biology level of Korean cities was better than that of Ichikawa, Fukuroi, and Brighton city except Wonju. But the shelter & socioeconomic index level of the foreign cities was better than that of Korean cities. In the environmental & infrastructural idex, even though Changwon city showed the highest level among healthy cities in this study, other Korean cities had lower level compared to the foreign cities. In the public health policy and services index level, except Wonju, Korean cities had lower level than that of all foreign cities. In comparing a summative evaluation index of all proposed index, Ichikawa and Fukuroi had the highest level of city health but Seoul city had the lowest healthy level. Changwon and Wonju had higher level of city health compare to that of Brighton and Seoul. To promote the level of city health, those findings could contribute to healthy city planning process in terms of identifying any weakness and strength of the cities selected in this study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김춘배, 고광욱, 박재성, 최헌. 지역보건 관련 소지역간 건강증진지표 개발에 관한 연구. 보건교육.건강증진학회지 2003; 20(1)19:-39
  2. 김춘배, 고광욱, 최헌, 박재성. 지역사회보건관련 데이터베이스 구축에 따른 소지역간 건강증진지표 개발. 원주:연세대학교, 보건복지부; 2002
  3. 보건복지부, 한국보건사회연구원. 국민건강영양조사, 2002
  4. 서울특별시. 서울시통계연보. 서울;서울특별시:2004
  5. 연세대학교 보건행정학과. 건강도시 원주 지역사회진단 및 건강프로젝트 개발. 원주:연세대학교 보건행정학과, 원주시;2004
  6. 원주시. 원주통계연감. 원주;원주시:2003
  7. 원주시. 원주통계연보. 원주;원주시:2004
  8. 창원시. 창원통계연보. 창원;창원시:2004
  9. 통계청. 사망원인통계. 대전;통계청:2004
  10. 한상태, 김한중, 남은우. 국제보건학. 서울;고려의학:2002
  11. Ashton J. The Origins of Healthy Cities. In : Ashton, J. (ed). Healthy Cities, Milton Keyens. :Open University Press;1992
  12. Baum FE. The Effectiveness of Community Based Health Promotion in Healthy City Programmes. In: Takano, T., editor. Healthy Cities and Urban Policy Researeh. 1st ed. London, New York:Spon Press;2003. pp. 104-130
  13. Blum HL. Planning for health: developmental application of social change theory. Human Science Press; 1974. in Dever GEA. Community health analysis. Gaithersburg:Aspen Publication;1991. p22
  14. Brighton-Hove City. Annual School Statistics. Brighton-Hove;Brighton-Hove City:2004
  15. Brighton-Hove City. Brighton-Hove overal. Brighton-Hove;Brighton-Hove City:2003
  16. Brighton-Hove NHS. Public Health Annual Report. Brighton-Hove;Brighton-Hove NHS:2004
  17. Crown, J., (2003)의 'Analysis of Health Determinants for Healthy Cities Programmes' in Healthy Cities and Urban Policy Research' Spon Press
  18. Dahlgren G and Whitehead, M.(1991) Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health, Stokholm: Institute of Futures Studies
  19. Denver A. Community health analysis. Second Edition, An Aspen Publication:1991
  20. Department of Health Administration Yonsei University. City Health ProfiIe. Wonju City;Department of Health Administration Yonsei University, Wonju City:2004
  21. Doyle, YG., Tsouros, AD., Cryer, P. C., Hedley, S., and Russel-hodgson, C. (1999) Practical lessons in using indicators of determinants of health across 47 European cities. Health Promotion International 14: 4; 289-299 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/14.4.289
  22. Downie RS, Tannahill C, Tannahill A (2000), Health Promotion: Models and Values, NY: Oxford University Press
  23. EURO & WHO. Healthy City. Copenhagen;1995
  24. Finer, D., Tillgren, P., Berensson, K, Guldbrandsson, K, and Haglund, B. J. A. (2005) Implementation of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) tool in a regional Health organization in Sweden-a feasibility study. Health Promotion International 20: 3; 277-284 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dai009
  25. Gillis, D. E., (1999) The 'People Assesing Their Health'(PATH) Project: tools for community health impact assessment. Canadian Journal of Public Health 90 suppl. 1; s53-s56
  26. Green LW, Kreuter MW (1999), Health Promotion Planning: an Educational and Ecological Approach, Toronto: Mayfield Publishing Company
  27. Kickbusch I. Healthy Cities: a Working Project and a Growing Movement. Health Promotion, 1989; 4: 77-82 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/4.2.77
  28. Kim HJ, Healthy City Kwachon 21 Project: a Community Health Promotion Programme in Korea. Asia Pac J Public Health 2000; 12: S67-70
  29. Lalonde M (1974), A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians, Office of the Canadian Minister of National Health and Welfare, Guoted in Dever GEA, Community Health Analysis (Gaithersburg: Aspen Publication, 1991), 23
  30. Leeuw ED. Global and Local Health: the WHO Healthy Cities Programme. Global Change & Human Health 2001; 2(1)34:-45 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011991014805
  31. Nakamura K. (2003)의 'Introduction for Healthy Cities: Tools for Evidence-Based Urban Policy Formation in Healthy Cities and Urban Policy Research' Spon Press
  32. Nakamura K. Indicators for Healthy Cities: Tools for Evidence-Based Urban Policy Formation. In : Takano, T., editor. Healthy Cities and Urban Policy Research. 1st ed. London, New York:Spon Press;2003. pp. 76-103
  33. Naidoo J. Willis J. Health Promotion Foundations for Practice. Calorinifa: Hacrourt Health Sciences. 2000
  34. Newman PA, Rotheram-Borus MJ., Cantwell S. HIV Prevention Programs with Heterosexuals. AIDS 2000; 2: S59-67
  35. Peterson A. The 'Healthy' City, Expertise, and the Regulation of Space. Health & Place 1900; 2(3): 157-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/1353-8292(96)00008-1
  36. Siegel, C., Laska, E., Haugland, G., O'Neill, D., Cohen, N., and Lesser, M (2000) The construction of community indexes of mental Health and social and mental well-being and their application to New York City. Evaluation and Programme Planning23; 315-327 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00017-3
  37. Takano, T., and Nakaumra, K. (2001) An analysis of Health levels and various indicators of urban environments for Healthy Cities projects. J Epidemiol Community Health 55; 263-270 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.4.263
  38. WHO Healthy Cities Project Office. A Guide to Accessing Healthy Cities, WHO Healthy Cities Papers. Copenhagen;WHO Healthy Cities Project Office:1988
  39. WHO. Development of Indicators for Monitoring Program towards Health for All by the Year 2000. Geneva;WHO:1981
  40. WHO Regional Office for Europe. City Health Profiles: How to Report on Health in Your City. Copenhagen;WHO:1998
  41. WHO, Health Promotion Glossary. Geneva;WHO:1998
  42. 市川市. 市川市統計年鍵. 市川;市川市:2003
  43. 袋井市. '袋井市の統計'. 袋井;袋井市:2003
  44. 近藤克則, 健康格差社會, 醫學書院, 東京: 日本:2005
  45. http://changwon.go.kr
  46. http://kosis.nso.go.kr
  47. http://www.bloodinfo.net
  48. http://www.brightonandhovepet.nhs.uk
  49. http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk
  50. http://www.brightonhovecitypct.nhs.uk
  51. http://www.city.fukuroi.shizuoka.jp
  52. http://www.city.ichikawa.chiba.jp
  53. http://www.citystats.org
  54. http://www.dft.gov.uk
  55. http://.www.seoul.go.kr
  56. http://www.statistics.gov.uk
  57. http://www.wonju.go.kr
  58. http://www.euro.who.in/document/E56270.pdf