Agent-Based Modeling Methodology for Close-Combat Attrition Estimates

Agent 기반 모델링에 의한 근접전투 손실예측 방법론

  • 김희수 (육군본부 분석평가단) ;
  • 이재호 (서울시립대학교 지능형 로보틱 시스템 연구센터) ;
  • 신현주 (서울시립대학교 전자전기컴퓨터공학부)
  • Published : 2006.12.30

Abstract

This paper suggests more improved war-game modeling methodology for close combat attrition modeling. Military operation analysts have been using equation-based modeling techniques such as Lanchester-type differential equation modeling, for combat attrition evaluation. This modeling methodology is easy to analyze and evaluate the war-game simulation results but has several limitations to simulate the dynamic combat environment. To overcome these shortcomings, we propose the agent-based modeling methodology. This methodology is modeling close combat based in attrition behaviors instead of attrition coefficients. The simulation analysis & evaluation is executed for these two kinds of modeling methodology on the similar close combat situation.

본 연구는 근접전투 손실 모델링 분야에서 좀 더 개선된 워게임 모델링 방법론을 제시한다. 지금까지 군사 운영분석가들은 랜체스터형 미분 방정식과 같은 방정식 기반 모델링 방법론을 사용해서 전투손실 평가를 하고 있다. 방정식 기반 모델링 방법론은 워게임 모의결과를 분석 및 평가하기는 용이하나 동적인 전장환경을 모의하기에는 다수의 제한사항을 포함하고 있다. 이러한 방정식 기반 모델링 방법론의 결점을 극복하기 위해서 본 연구에서는 에이전트 기반 모델링 방법론을 제시한다. 에이전트 기반 모델링 방법론은 전투손실계수 대신에 전투손실 행위에 기반하여 근접전투를 모델링한다. 2가지 모델링 방법론에 의해서 유사한 근접전투 상황 하에서 모델링 된 자료를 모의하여 비교분석 및 평가한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Parunak, Savit, and Riolo. Agent-based Modeling ofMulti-Agent sysstems; and Agent-based Simulation (1998), P 1
  2. James G. Taylor. Lanchester Models of Warfare, VolumeI Naval Postgraduate School (MAR 1983), P 52
  3. James G. Taylor. Force-on-Force Attrition Modelling, Naval Postgraduate School (JAN 1980), P 75
  4. James G. Taylor. Force-on-Force Attrition Moodelling. Naval Postraduate School (JAN 1980), P 77
  5. Computation of direct-fire weapon kill rates for DIVLEV. US Arny Material Systems Analysis Activity (JUNE 1983), P 16
  6. James G. Tayloc. Force-on-Force Attrition Moodelling. Naval Postgraduate School (JAN 1980), P 52
  7. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Corps Battle Simulation(CBS) Version 1.5.2. COBRA User's Guide. U.S. Army Simulation, Training, and Instrurrentation Command (NOV 1995)
  8. U.S. Army Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command, CBS Ground Analyst's Guide Vernon 1.5.3. P4-13 (JUN 1996)
  9. Richard Murch and Tony Johnson. Intelligent Software Agents. Prentice Hall(1999), P 10
  10. Marcus J. Huber. Jam Agent.. Intelligent Reasoning Systems (NOV 1998), P 5
  11. Rafael Moreira Savelli. The Maneuver and Attrition Warfare Simulation System Brasil Pontificia University (2004),P5
  12. Young Im Cho. Artificial Intelligence System. Hong Reung Science Publisher (OTC 2003), P 70
  13. Andy Ilachinski. Artificial-Life, Approach to War. Center for Naval Analyses (MAY 2000), P 22
  14. Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual (Surface to Surface) TH61Si-A-KS-2-12 (APR 1974)
  15. CBS D/B Parnmetec Analyst's Guide Version 1.5.3. (1996)
  16. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Corps Battle Simuiation(CBS) Version 1.5.2. COBRA Urer's Guide. U.S. Army Simulation,Training, and Instrumentation Command (NOV 1995), P 1-12
  17. MAJ Robert Kewley & Larry Larimer. An Agent-Based Modeling Approach to Quantifying the Value of Battlefield Infonmtion. PHALANX (JUN 2003), P 13