Consumer Attitude Formation on Private Apparel Brand

유통업체 의류 상표에 대한 소비자 태도 형성

  • 최미영 (한국컬러앤드패션트랜드센터) ;
  • 이은영 (서울대학교 의류학과)
  • Published : 2006.08.31

Abstract

The strength of the PB(Private Brand) is that it can eliminate intermediary in the distribution channel and thoroughly control the quality under its own name. This study has developed traditional studies on private brand proneness in approaching data processing and empirical point of view of a consumer's attitude buildup process on PB through 'recognition-attitude-action(behavioral attitude)'. The subjects of this study are consumers in their $20s{\sim}40s$ who are main customer groups of PBs. A screening process has taken place to select consumers with purchasing experiences of retailor PBs. The data is analyzed by 'Structural Equation Modeling' of Amos 5.0 to verify consumer attitude formation model on private apparel brand. The results generated from this study are as follows: First, the proposed consumer attitude model on private apparel brand consists of store evaluation, experiential product evaluation, cognitive product evaluation, hedonic attitude, utilitarian attitude and purchase intention. Second, not only positively influence on utilitarian attitude but hedonic attitude can arouse positive emotional reaction of a consumer. Third, the store evaluation is ahead of the product evaluation because PB is more related to the image of a store. The influence of the store on PB is relatively stronger when compared with NB.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성배, 전인수. (2002). 유통업체 상표의 지각된 정보단서가 이의 지각품질, 지각희생 및 선호에 미치는 영향. 유통연구, 6(2), 19-40
  2. 박진용, 정강옥. (2003). 유통업체 브랜드 구매의도 및 선행 변수와의 관계에 관한 연구-할인점 출점 지역의 차이를 중심으로-. 유통연구, 8(2), 21-39
  3. 박진용. (2004). 유통업자 상표 태도에 대한 소매업체 이미지의 후광 효과 및 함의 개념에 관한 연구. 유통연구, 9(2), 101-122
  4. 최선형. (1993) 의류제품에 대한 감정적 반응이 태도형성에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 의류학과 박사학위 논문
  5. Bellizzi, J. A., Krueckeberg, H. F., Hamiltion, J. R., & Martin, W. S. (1981). Consumer perceptions of national, private, and generic brands. Journal of Retailing, 57(Winter), 56-70
  6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York: Wiley
  7. Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Garrestson, J. A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label product and an examination of its psychological and behavior correlates. Journal of Academy of Marketing science, 26(4), 293-306 https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398264003
  8. Dodds, W. B. & Grewal, D. (1991). Effect of price, brand, and store information on buyers product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), 307-319 https://doi.org/10.2307/3172866
  9. Hoch, S. J. & Banerji, S. (1993). When do private labels succeed? Sloan Management Review, 34(Summer), 57-67
  10. Levy, M. & Weitz, B. A. (2001). Retailing management (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin
  11. Mason, J. B., Myer, M. L., & Wilkinson, J. B. (1994). Modern retailing: Theory and practice. Boston: Richard D. Irwin, Inc
  12. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
  13. Quelch, J. A. & Harding, D. (1996). Brand versus private labels: fighting to win. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 99-109
  14. Ray, M. L. (1978). Attitude on consumer behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
  15. Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 28-36 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251914
  16. Richardson, P. S., Jain, A. K., & Dick, A. (1996a). Household store brand proneness: A framework. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 159-185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(96)90012-3
  17. Richardson, P. S., Jain, A. K., & Dick, A. (1996b). The influence of store aesthetics on evaluation of private label brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(1), 19-28 https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429610113384
  18. Shapiro, E. (1993). Price lure of private label products fails to hook buyers of baby food, beer. Wall Street Journal, 13(May), B1
  19. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grobmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238