An AHP Approach to Select the Technique to Improve the Manufacturing Performance in Shipbuilding Enterprise

AHP에 의한 조선기업의 생산성과 향상기법의 선택

  • Kim, Tae-Soo (Dept. of Industrial Management, Ulsan College) ;
  • Lee, Kang-Woo (Dept. of Business Administration, Pukyong National University)
  • Published : 2006.12.31

Abstract

The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique from AMT (Advanced Manufacturing Technologies) and IMP (Innovative Management Practices) for improving manufacturing performance in shipbuilding enterprises. The research consists of several principal steps. The first step is to design critical criteria in evaluating manufacturing performance in shipbuilding enterprises. The second step is to develop sub-criteria of the critical criteria. The third step is to develop a four level AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) structure using the critical criteria, sub-criteria and techniques from AMT and IMP. The fourth step is to develope the pairwise comparison matrix by each level of AHP structure, which was based on survey data collected at the H heavy industry. And the last step is to select the most effective technique from AMT and IMP by using AHP analysis. The results of AHP analysis did not show clear difference in priority between techniques of AMT and IMP in terms of manufacturing performance of the shipbuilding enterprise. Thus, each critical criterion was assigned modified weights and examined the priority change of techniques by conducting performance sensitivity analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. 노정구; '첨단제조기술(AMT)의 통합수준이 제조성과에 미치는 영향', 박사학위논문, 영남대학교, 1999
  2. 윤재홍; 생산전략과 성과측정에 관한 연구', 동아대대학원논문집 15 : 269-284, 1990
  3. 장정희; 'AMT 도입에 따른 관리회계 정보시스템의 전략적 활용이 생산성과에 미치는 영향', 박사학위 논문, 경북대학교, 2004
  4. 조근태, 조용곤, 강현수; 계층분석적 의사결정, 동현출판사, 2003
  5. 조근태 역(Saaty 저); 네트워크 분석적 의사결정, 동현출판사, 2005
  6. Abdel-Maksoud, A. B.: 'Manufacturing in the UK: Contemporary characteristics and performance indicators', BBS Teaching and Research Review, 2001
  7. Banker, R. D., Potter, G., and Schroeder, R.; 'Reporting Manufacturing Performance Measures to Workers: An Empirical Study,' Journal of Management Accounting Research: 33-55, 1993
  8. Bledsoe, N. L. and Ingram, R. W.; 'Customer Satisfaction through Performance Evolution,' Journal of Cost Management : 43-50, 1997
  9. Canada, J. A. and Sullivan W. G.; Economic and Multi-attribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, NJ : Prentice Hall, 1989
  10. Chenhall, R. H.; 'Reliance on Manufacturing Performance Measures, strategies of manufacturing flexibility, advanced manufacturing practices, and organizational performance : an empirical investigation,' Paper presented at the Strategic Management Accounting Seminar, Macquarie University Sydney, 1993
  11. Chenhall, R. H.; 'Reliance on Manufacturing Performance Measures, Total Quality Management and Organizational Performance,' Management Accounting Research: 187-206, 1997
  12. CIMA; Performance measurement in the manufacturing sector, London: Charted Institute of Management Accountants, 1993
  13. CIMA; Management accounting official terminology, London : Charted Institute of Management Accountants, 1996
  14. Conti T.; Building quality: a guide to management, London: Chapman and Hall, 1993
  15. Deluzio, M. C.; 'Management Accounting in a Just-In-Time Environment,' Journal of Cost Management : 6-15, 1993
  16. Hall, R. W., Johnson, H. T., and Turely, P. B. B.; Measuring up : charting pathways manufacturing excellence, Homewood: Irwin, 1991
  17. Harrison, S. P. and Poole, M.; 'Customer-Focused Manufacturing Strategy and the Use of Operations -Based Non-Financial Performance Measures: A Research Note,' Accounting Organizations and Society, pp.557-572, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00048-7
  18. Hornsby, H. and Williams, C.; 'CAM Still Needs People,' B&E Review: 26-30, 1990
  19. Kaplan, R. S.; 'Measuring Manufacturing Performance: A New Challenge for Managerial Accounting Research,' The Accounting Review : 686-705, 1983
  20. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P.; 'The Balanced Scorecard Measures that Drive Performance,' Harvard Business Review: 71-79, 1992
  21. Kaplan, R. S.; 'Development of New Practices and Theory,' Management Accounting Research: 247-260, 1994
  22. Miller, J. A.; 'Designing and Implementing a New Cost Management System,' Journal of cost Management : 41-53, 1992
  23. Otley, D.; 'Better Performance management,' Management Accounting: 44, 1997
  24. Powell, T. C.; 'Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study,' Strategic Management Journal, 16(1) : 15-27, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160105
  25. Schonberger, R. J.; Japanese manufacturing techniques; Nine hidden lessons in simplicity, New York: The Free Press, 1982
  26. Snell, S. and Dean, J. W.; 'Strategic Compensation for Integrated Manufacturing: The Moderating Effects of Jobs and organizational Inertia,' Academy of Management Journal : 1109-1140, 1994
  27. Steinbacher, H. R. and Steinbacher, N. L.; TPM for America : What it is and why you need it, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press, 1993
  28. Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., and Markland, R. E.; 'Production Competence and business strategy : Do they affect business performance?' Decision Sciences, 24 : 435-455, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00482.x
  29. Yamauchi, Y.; 'Application and evaluation of robots in Nissan,' In Jarvis (Ed), Robots: coming of age: the proceeding of the international symposium and exposition on robots, Australian Robot Association, pp. 189-209, 1988
  30. Youssef, M.; Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Manufacturing Strategy and Economic Performance: An Empirical Investigation, Doctoral Dissertation, The City University of New York, 1991