Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)
- Volume 28 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.161-176
- /
- 2006
- /
- 1229-3954(pISSN)
- /
- 2288-5218(eISSN)
Research on consciousness of the dental technicians about smoking realities-2005
2005년 치과기공사의 흡연실태와 의식조사
- Park, Yong-Duk (Dept. of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, Kyung Hee Univ.) ;
- Hwang, Kyung-Sook (Dept. of Dental Tech., Shinheung College) ;
- Kim, Nam-Joong (Dept. of Dental Tech., Shinheung College) ;
- Kang, Jong-Oh (Dept. of Dental hygiene., Shinheung College)
- Published : 2006.07.10
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate smoking of dental technicians in 2005, and we have distributed questionnaires about smoking in 2005-KDTA general meeting and analyzed them. All 555 respondents who attended KDTA general meeting were selected by random sampling. However we dismissed 41 because of invalidness, so we got 504 people. Therefore, we have got conclusions below: 1. The rate of smokers who attended in 2005 KDTA was 33.93%, 46.3% in men, 1.44% in women. When we compared to other specialist groups, the rate of dental technician smokers was higher than them. 2. When we analyzed the ages of first smoking, 55.56% of the people started to smoke when they were in 24 years old. This result was very similar to the rate of dentist smokers in 2005 KDA research. 3. According to the answers of smokers and people who wire smokers in the past about quitting smoking period and willness in future, 60.82% among all members failed to quit smoking and also 69.2% among all members did not leap over 3 months but, they have thought to quit smoking for 6 months. 4. According to the answers about antismoking training related to environment in dental and clinical labs, most dental technicians(92.66%) have never been trained, also 37.70% among all members have not fulfilled their duty at self office. They have not recognized the danger of the indirect smoking. 5. When we asked chiefs in dental and clinical labs, the reason why they, didn't do the antismoking training their staffs, 32.1% of them replied that they were so busy, and 42.13% did because of their staffs, abhorrence and needlessness. 6. As Pan-dentistry members, over 80% agreed to the thought of the antismoking, also had medical knowledge about smoking. So we have the conclusion that dental technicians have identification as the Pan-dentistry members. 7. Most dental technicians expected KDTA to play a role about the antismoking training for their members. We have two suggestions to KDTA about the antismoking problem for members according to above conclusions. First, KDTA should prepare the antismoking training in the curriculum. Second, KDTA should support the antismoking programs of schools for students.