Perception and Service Needs about Nutrition Education of Pregnant and Lactating - To Compare with Pregnant and Lactating Women, Health Specialist and College Women -

집단 변인에 따른 임신 및 수유에 관한 의식 및 영양 교육 요구도 비교 - 임신수유부, 의료전문인, 여대생 집단 비교 -

  • Ahn Hong-Seok (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sungshin Women's University) ;
  • Lee Young-Mee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyungwon University) ;
  • Oh Yu-Jin (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyungwon University)
  • 안홍석 (성신여자대학교 생활과학대학 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이영미 (경원대학교 생활과학대학 식품영양학과) ;
  • 오유진 (경원대학교 생활과학대학 식품영양학과)
  • Published : 2006.06.01

Abstract

The major purpose of this study was to develop the nutrition education contents and material through the basic data from the service provider and the consumer. And also, to find out the differences of attitude and needs between the service provider (SP breastfeeding specialist), present consumer (PC, pregnant or lactating women) and future consumer (FC, college women). There were types of questionnaires, which consisted of needs and attitudes toward child and maternal nutrition, as well as the personal characteristics of the study subjects. The subjects consisted of 113 breastfeeding specialists who served at medical related institutions, 197 pregnant or lactating women and 309 college women. The self-administered questionnaires from subjects were collected from October to November 2005 in Seoul and Kyunggi Province. The data was analysed by SPSS Win 12.0, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test. The results of this study were as following: 1) The most Important determining factors on breastfeeding was 'medical specialist's support' (3.51) and the next one was 'knowledge of maternity care practice' (3.39). And the importance score of determinating factors on breastfeeding was significantly different between each group (p < 0.001). The groups of consumer (3.50 at PC and 3.59 at FC) considered the service provider (3.32) more important. The service providers considered a more effective determining factor to be 'husband and family support' and 'peer support' than the others (p <0.001). 2) To compare the effective factors of breastfeeding practices between the three groups, the service providers were more significantly considered than the otters such as 'attendance of intervention program' (p < 0.001). But the PC group considered the most effective factors wis 'mother's job after delivery'. 3) The self-evaluated score of the breastfeeding knowledge was the most high in SP; the score was significantly different between groups. The knowledge score of nutritional aspects in human milk was most highly evaluated. But maternity care practice and public acceptance marked the lower evaluation score than other issues. 4) The desirable types of educational material was mass media, and the next was printed matter such as booklets. Two kinds if consumers preferred DVD or VCR tapes than and the service provider group (p < 0.001). 5) The priority contents of nutrition service PC group wanted the information about infant care more than maternal care (p < 0.05), but FC group's priority was significantly different compared with PC group (p < 0.001). The priority of SP group pointed out the information of practical child care methods. The results showed the needs of nutrition service, education channels, and perception toward effective factors on consumer behavior changes were significantly different between each group. Thus the result of this study may suggest that consumer oriented nutrition service programs must be developed.

Keywords

References

  1. Arora S, McJunkin C, Wehrer J, Kuhn P (2000): Major Factors Influencing Breastfeeding Rates: Mother's Perception of Father's Attitude and Milk Supply. Pediatrics 106(5): 67-71 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.1.67
  2. Auerbach KG, Guss E (1984): Maternal employment and breastfeeding: A study of 567 women's experience. AJDC 138: 958-960
  3. Ball T, Wright AL (1999): Health care costs of formula-feeding in the first yeasr of life. Pediatrics 103: 870-876
  4. Barron SP, Lane HW, Hannan TE, Struempler B, Williams JC (1998): Factors influencing duration of breast feeding among low-income women. JADA 88(12): 1557-1561
  5. Black RF, Blai JP, Jones VN, Durant RH (1990): Infant feeding decisions among pregnant women from a WIC population in Georgia. JADA 90 (2): 394-398
  6. Choi KS (2003): A study on the future plans for infant feeding practice and its associated factors among university students. Korean J Community Nutrition 8 (2): 240-249
  7. Forster D, McLachlan H, Lumley J, Beanland C, Waldenstrom D, Harris H, Earl D, Dyson K (2003): ABFAB. Attachment to the breast and family attitudes to breastfeeding. The effect of breastfeeding education in the middle of pregnancy on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trial. Pregnancy Childbirth 3: 5-16 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-3-5
  8. Graffy JP (1992): Mother' s attitudes to and experience of breastfeeding: A primary care study. Br J Gen Pract 42 (355) : 61-66
  9. Hyun TS, Lim EY, Kang NM, Kim KN (2001): Prenatal breastfeeding education and infant feeding practices in public health centers and Baby-Friendly Hospital. Korean J Community Nutrition 6 (4): 678-685
  10. Kim JE, Park DY (2001): A study on predicting behavioral intention of breastfeeding among primigravida. Korean J Community Nutrition 6(3): 331-339
  11. Koo JO, Choi KS (2001): Status and Needs for Nutrition Services for Infants and Preschoolers among Public Health Center Workers and Infants' Mothers. Korean J Community Nutrition 6 (3): 354-360
  12. Korea institute for health and social welfare (1997): Study on national fertility, family health and welfare
  13. Korea institute for health and social welfare (2000): Study on national fertility, family health and welfare
  14. Korea institute for health and social welfare (2003): Study on national fertility, family health and welfare
  15. Lawrence PB (1995): Best source of nutrition for term and preterm infants. Pediatr Clin North Am 41: 925-941
  16. Lee JY, Park Sw, Park JH (2002): A survey on breastfeeding practice and its related factors in Pohang city. J Lorean Soc Maternal Child Health 6(1): 149-167
  17. Ministry of health and welfare (2001): 2001 National health and nutrition survey
  18. Park CM (2002): A Study on Factors Related to the Practice of Breastfeeding. J Korean Soc Health Edu Promotion 19(2): 23-43
  19. Park CM, Kim KC, Lee JR, Kim HJ (2000): Study on the Actual State of Breastfeeding-Centering Sungju-gun, Kyongbuk - J Korean Soc Health Edu Promotion 17(1): 61-79
  20. Park JH, Park YG, Jun HR, Park SW, Lee JY, Hwang SG, Huh CK (1999): Impact of delivery methods and feeding supervision on breastfeeding. J Koreasn Soc Maternal Child Health 3 (1): 7-21
  21. Persson LA, Samuelson G (1984): From breastmilk to family food. Acta Paediatr Scand 73: 103-117
  22. Powers NG, Naylor AI, Wester RA (1994): Hospital polices et al. 1994, crucial to breastfeeding success. Semin Perinatal 18: 517-524
  23. Siskind V, Mar CD, Schofield F (1993): Infant feeding in Queensland, Austrailia: Long-trends. Am J Public Health 83: 103-106 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.83.1.103
  24. UNICEF (I993): Baby friendly hospital initiative. Geneva: WHO/UNICEF
  25. Visness CM, Kennedy KI (1997): Maternal employment and breast-feeding: Finding from the 1988 national maternal and infant health survey. Am J Pub Health 87 (6): 945-950 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.6.945
  26. Weil B, Rubin DH, Krasinlnikoff PA, Kuo HS, Jekel JF (1990): Infant feeding patterns during the first year of life in Denmark: Factors associated with the discontinuation of breast-feeding, J Clin Epidemiol 43 (12): 1305-1311 https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90096-8
  27. Wright A, Ricd S, Wells S (1996): Changing hospital practices to increase the duration of breastfeeding. Pediatrics 97 (5): 669-675