대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제44권3호
  • /
  • Pages.275-283
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

MARGINAL FIT OF THE DIGIDENT CAD/CAM ZIRCONIA CERAMIC CROWNS

  • Kim Yong-Sun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang Jae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. There have been many studies about marginal discrepancy of single restorations made by various systems and materials. However most of the statistical inferences are not definite because of sample size, measurement number, measuring instruments, etc, and there have been few studies about the marginal fit of the Digident CAD/ CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of the anterior single restorations made by using the Digident CAD / CAM zirconia ceramic crowns with metal-ceramic restorations and to obtain more accurate information by using a large enough sample size and by making sufficient measurements per specimen. Material and Methods. The crowns were made from one extracted maxillary central incisor pre-pared with a 1mm shoulder margin and $6^{\circ}$ taper walls by milling machine. The in vitro marginal discrepancies of the digident CAD / CAM zirconia ceramic crowns and control groups(metal ceramic crowns) were evaluated and compared. Twenty crowns per each system were fabricated. Measurements of a crown were recorded at 50 points that were randomly selected for marginal gap evaluation. Parametric statistical analysis was performed for the results. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. Mean gap dimensions and standard deviations at the marginal opening for maxillary incisal crowns were $88{\pm}10{\mu}m$ for the control (metal-ceramic crowns), $92{\pm}4{\mu}m$ for Digident CAD / CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. 2. Marginal gap between Digident CAD / CAM zirconia ceramic crowns and metal ceramic crowns did not show significant difference (P>.05). 3. The Digident CAD/ CAM zirconia ceramic crowns and metal ceramic crowns showed clinically acceptable marginal discrepancy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Coli P, Karlsson S. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:59-64
  2. Groten M, Axmann D, Proster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
  3. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26:582-93 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00449.x
  4. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick DJ, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to metal and two types of ceramic Crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  5. Kern M, Schaller HG, Strub JR. Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation in vivo. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:5855-91
  6. Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA. Fit of there porecelain-fused-to metal marginal designs in vivo: A scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:24-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90058-7
  7. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV. Aquilint SA Tooth preparation for complete crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-76 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114685
  8. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spickermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zir- conia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD / CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;367-74
  9. Hertlein G, Hoscheler S, Frank S, Suttor D. Marginal fit of CAD / CAM manufactured all ceramic zirconia prosthesis. J Dent Res 2001;80:42
  10. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimationof cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  11. Gasino G, Barone MS, Scanu M, Spina G, Preti G. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new in vitro 360-degree external examination procedure. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:218-23
  12. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In virto marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Proshet Dent 2003; 90;459-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005
  13. Coli P, Karlesson S. Precision of a CAD / CAM technique for the production of ziconium Dioxide Copings. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:577-80
  14. Reich S, Wickmann M. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD / CAM Systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-179 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  15. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD / CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-447 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  16. Groten M, Proster L. Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:871-881 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00592.x