대량 흉수의 원인과 성상-국내 한 대학병원의 경험

Etiology and Characteristics of Massive Pleural Effusions Investigated at One University Hospital in Korea

  • 박송리 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 김지현 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 하나래 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 이재형 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 김상헌 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 손장원 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 윤호주 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 신동호 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 박성수 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과) ;
  • 김태형 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실 호흡기내과)
  • Park, Song Ree (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Jee Hyun (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ha, Na Rae (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Jae Hyung (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Sang Heon (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Sohn, Jang Won (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Yoon, Ho Joo (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Shin, Dong Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Sung Soo (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Tae Hyung (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2006.09.29
  • 심사 : 2006.11.15
  • 발행 : 2006.11.30

초록

연구배경: 대량 흉수의 가장 흔한 원인은 악성으로 알려졌으나 이에 대한 보고가 많지 않고, 지역 및 시대에 따라 다른 분포를 보였다. 저자들은 결핵의 유병율이 높은 국내에서 대량 흉수의 원인 질환의 분포를 알아보고, 원인 질환 감별을 위한 흉수의 분석지표에 대해 알아보기 위해 연구를 시행하였다. 방 법: 2002년 7월부터 2005년 7월까지 한양대학교 구리병원에 입원하여 흉수 천자를 시행하였던 298명 환자를 대상으로 후향적 조사를 시행하였다. 대량 흉수는 흉부단순촬영에서 일측 흉곽의 2/3 이상을 차지한 경우로 정의하였고 각 환자에서 혈청 생화학 검사, 흉수 천자 소견을 비교하였다. 결 과: 전체 298명의 흉수 예 중 대량 흉수는 41예, 13.8% 이었다. 대량 흉수의 원인으로는 악성 흉수가 19예(46.3%)로 가장 많았고 결핵 15예(36.6%), 부폐렴성 흉막염 및 농흉 4예(9.8%), 여출성 흉수 3예(7.3%) 순이었다. 대량 흉수 중 악성 흉수(n=19)와 양성 흉수군(n=22)의 비교 시 악성 흉수에서 ADA가 낮고(30.5 vs 86.2;p=0.017), amylase 수치가 높았다(349.0 vs 39.2;p=0.031). 흉수 적혈구는 악성 흉수 군에서 높은 경향을 보였다(95,406 vs 22,105;p=0.052). 결 론: 국내에서 대량 흉수의 원인으로는 악성 외에도 결핵에 의한 경우가 많았으며, ADA가 낮은 혈성 흉수는 악성을, ADA가 높은 림프구성 흉수는 결핵의 가능성을 고려해 볼 수 있겠다.

Background: Differential diagnosis is very important in patients with pleural effusions. A few studies on the etiologies of massive pleural effusions have been reported, but these were conducted in different decades and locations. In the present study, the etiologic spectrum of massive pleural effusions in Korea, were evaluated through an investigation at one university hospital. Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were performed in patients having undergone thoracentesis between July 2002 and July 2005. Pleural effusions were deemed to be massive if they occurred in two thirds or more of one hemithorax. The etiologies of massive pleural effusions, pleural fluid findings, serum laboratory findings, and sputum and pleural fluid cytologies were compared. Results: Of 298 pleural effusions cases, 41 (13.8%) had massive pleural effusions. The most frequent causes of massive pleural effusions were malignancy (19; 46.3%) followed by tuberculosis (15; 36.6%), parapneumonic effusion (4; 9.8%) and transudate (3; 7.3%). Compared with massive benign effusions, patients with massive malignant pleural effusions were more likely to have lower adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity, a higher amylase level and higher RBC count in their pleural fluids. Also, compared with non-tuberculosis effusions, patients with massive tuberculous pleural effusions were more likely to have lower RBC and neutrophil counts, but a higher lymphocyte count, adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity and protein level. Conclusion: The most common etiologies of massive pleural effusions in Korea are malignancy and tuberculosis. A high ADA content favors a tuberculous condition, while bloody effusions with a relatively lower ADA content. favors malignancy. The proportion of tuberculosis in massive pleural effusions was higher than in previous reports.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Porcel JM, Vives M.Etiology and pleural fluid characteristics of large and massive effusions. Chest 2003;124:978-83 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.3.978
  2. Moon JW, Han CH, Kang SM, Park MS, Hwang SY, Byun MK, et al. The relationship between age and pleural fluid adenosine deaminase activity in pleural tuberculosis. Tuberc Respir Dis 2005;58:459-64 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2005.58.5.459
  3. Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, Ball WC Jr. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972;77:507-13 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-77-4-507
  4. Berger HW, Mejia E. Tuberculous pleurisy. Chest 1973;63:88-92 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.63.1.88
  5. Jay SJ.Diagnostic procedures for pleural disease. Clin Chest Med 1985;6:33-48
  6. Chernow B, Sahn SA. Carcinomatous involvement of the pleura: an analysis of 96 patients. Am J Med 1977;63:695-702 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(77)90154-1
  7. Salyer WR, Eggleston JC, Erozan YS.Efficacy of pleural needle biopsy and pleural fluid cytopathology in the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm involving the pleura. Chest 1975;67:536-9 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.67.5.536
  8. Maher GG, Berger HW.Massive pleural effusion: malignant and nonmalignant causes in 46 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1972;105:458-60
  9. Pedro de Lelis F, Ortega Gonzalez G, Molina Boix M, Paricio Nunez P, Ferrer Puchol MD, Madrid Conesa A.Massive pleural effusion: study of 84 cases. Med Clin 1984;82:581-3
  10. Valdes L, Alvarez D, Valle JM, Pose A, San Jose E. The etiology of pleural effusions in an area with high incidence of tuberculosis. Chest 1996;109:158-62 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.109.1.158
  11. Liam CK, Lim KH, Wong CM. Causes of pleural exudates in a region with a high incidence of tuberculosis. Respirology 2000;5:33-8 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1843.2000.00223.x
  12. Marel M, Zrustova M, Stasny B, Light RW. The incidence of pleural effusion in a well-defined region: epidemiologic study in central Bohemia. Chest 1993;104:1486-9 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.104.5.1486
  13. Go WG, Lee JG, Jeong JH, Park MS, Jeong NY, Kim YS, et al. Differential diagnosis by analysis of pleural effusion. Tuberc Respir Dis 2001;51:559-69 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2001.51.6.559
  14. Cheng D, Rodriguez RM, Perkett EA, Rogers J, Bienvenu G, Lappalainen U, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in pleural fluid. Chest 1999;116:760-5 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.116.3.760
  15. Lee GD, Shin MG, Lee KW, Jo YJ, Kim HC, Hwang YS. Clinical features in patients with amylase-rich pleural effusion. Tuberc Respir Dis 2003;54:563-9 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2003.54.5.563
  16. Shin MK, Ham HS, Lee DW, Cho YJ, Jeong YY, Kim HC, et al. The diagnostic usefulness of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase with lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio in tuberculous pleural effusion. Tuberc Respir Dis 2004;57:132-7 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2004.57.2.132
  17. Diacon AH, van de Wal BW, Wyser C, Smedema JP, Bezuidenhout J, Bolliger CT, et al. Diagnostic tools in tuberculous pleurisy: a direct comparative study. Eur Respir J 2003;22:589-91 https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00017103a
  18. Perez-Rodriguez E, Jimenez Castro D.The use of adenosine deaminase and adenosine deaminase isoenzymes in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2000;6:259-66 https://doi.org/10.1097/00063198-200007000-00002