Usefulness of Automated PCR Test for the Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Fresh Biopsy Tissues

신선조직 검체에서 결핵균 검출을 위한 자동화 중합효소연쇄반응 검사의 유용성

  • Choi, Woo Soon (Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University) ;
  • Shin, So Young (Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Jong Ok (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Myung Sook (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University) ;
  • Lee, Hye Kyung (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University)
  • 최우순 (가톨릭대학교 대전성모병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 신소영 (가톨릭대학교 대전성모병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 김종옥 (가톨릭대학교 대전성모병원 병리과) ;
  • 김명숙 (가톨릭대학교 대전성모병원 내과) ;
  • 이혜경 (가톨릭대학교 대전성모병원 병리과)
  • Received : 2006.05.11
  • Accepted : 2006.07.04
  • Published : 2006.07.30

Abstract

Background: Although there have been several studies regarding the clinical value of an automated TB-PCR study using sputum, bronchial washing, and other body fluid samples for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis, there are only a few reports on the use of fresh tissue samples. Materials and methods: The acid-fast bacilli stain(AFB), tuberculosis culture, automated TB-PCR study, and histopathology examination were performed in 42 fresh tissue samples. Results: Among the 42 cases, 18 cases were diagnosed with tuberculosis based on the clinical findings. Sixteen of the 18 cases were TB-PCR positive and of these 16 cases, only 2 cases were positive in the AFB stain or culture study. However, all 18 cases showed the histopathology findings of chronic granulomatous inflammation that was compatible with tuberculosis. Based on the clinical findings, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictability, and negative predictability of the automated TB-PCR study were 88.9%, 100%, 100%, and 92.3% respectively. Conclusion: An automated TB-PCR assay is an important diagnostic tool for diagnosing tuberculosis in fresh tissue samples.

연구 배경 : 결핵의 대부분을 차지하는 폐결핵 진단에 객담, 기관지 세척액, 흉수액을 이용한 TB-PCR 검사의 유용성에 대해서는 여러 연구가 있었으나 폐 이외의 결핵 진단을 위한 신선 생검 조직 검체에서의 TB-PCR법 연구는 아직 미흡하다. 이에 저자들은 자동분석법인 COBAS AMPLICOR MTB PCR assay (Roche Molecular System)를 이용하여 신선 생검 조직 검체로 TB-PCR법의 유용성을 알아보았다. 방법 및 대상 : 2004년 10월부터 2005년 12월까지 가톨릭대학교 대전성모병원 병리과와 진단검사의학과에 결핵의진 하에 조직검사와 신선조직을 이용한 항산균 도말검사, 배양검사, TB-PCR 검사가 공히 의뢰된 환자 42예를 대상으로 하였다. 결 과 : 신선 생검 조직 42예를 대상으로 실시한 결과, 임상소견에서 결핵으로 진단된 경우는 18예 이었으며, 그 중 림프절 12예와 폐 조직 2예, 충수 조직 1예, 총 16예(88.9%)에서 PCR 양성을 보였고, 민감도와 특이도, 양성예측도, 음성 예측도는 88.9%, 100%, 100%와 92.3%로 나타났다. 조직학적으로 육아종 소견과 건락성 괴사의 소견 보인 18예(100%)는 모두 결핵으로 진단되었고 그 중 16예(88.9%)에서 PCR 양성을 보였다. 결 론 : 신선 생검 조직 검체를 이용한 TB-PCR 자동분석기의 결과는 임상소견 및 현미경적 소견과 비교 분석 시 민감도와 특이도가 높은 유용한 검사라고 생각되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Field S, Lewis S. Intestinal and peritoneal tuberculosis In: Rom WN, Garay WN, editors. Tuberculosis. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 523-47
  2. Singh V, Kumar P, Karmal J, Prakash V, Vaiphei K, Singh K. Clinicocolonoscopic profile of colonic tuberculosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:565-8
  3. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Control: surveillance, planning, financing: WHO report. 2004
  4. Korea Center for Disease Control & Prevention. 2004 Communicable Diseases Statistical Yearbook. 2004
  5. Kim CS, Son HD, Park MR, Seo JY, Cho DI, Rheu NS. The usefulness of PCR in AFB smear negative patients on admission. Tuberc Respir Dis 1997;44: 1001-10 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1997.44.5.1001
  6. Mo EK, Kyung TY, Kim DG, Park MJ, Lee MG, Hyun IG, et al. The clinical utility of polymerase chain Reaction in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for the detection of Mycobacteria. Tuberc Respir Dis 1998;45:519-28 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1998.45.3.519
  7. Piersimoni C, Scarparo C. Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosiscomplex in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:5355-65 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.12.5355-5365.2003
  8. Park MH, Choi CH, Kim NJ. The diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid microscopic study and PCR in pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberc Respir Dis 1996;43:128-37 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1996.43.2.128
  9. Lee JS, Ji HS, Hong SB, Oh YM, Lim CM, Lee SD, et al. Clinical utility of polymerase chain reaction for the differentiation of nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with acid-fast bacilli smear-positive specimens. Tuberc Respir Dis 2005;58:452-8 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2005.58.5.452
  10. Yu CM, Koh WJ, Ryu YJ, Jeon KM, Choi JC, Kang EH, et al. Usefulness of PCR test for M. tuberculosis for the differentiation of pulmonary tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in patients with smear-positive sputum. Tuberc Respir Dis 2004;57:528-34 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2004.57.6.528
  11. Lee JG, Kim YS, Park JM, Ko WK, Yang DG, Kim SK, et al. Clinical utility of bronchial washing PCR for IS6110 and amplicor for the rapid dignosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis in smear negative patients. Tuberc Respir Dis 2001;50:213-21 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2001.50.2.213
  12. Rajahti I, Vuorinen P, Nieminen M, Miettinen A. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosiscomplex by the automated Roche Cobas Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:975-8
  13. Reischl U, Lehn N, Wolf H, Naumann L. Clinical evaluation of the automated COBAS AMPLICOR MTB assay for testing respiratory and non respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:2853-60
  14. Park DK, Park JH, Kim YS, Oh YL, Park CH, Jeen YT, et al. Clinical significance of total colonoscopy in patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis without gastrointestinal symptoms. Korean J Gastroenterol 2002;24:193-9
  15. Driscoll JR, Parsons LM, Salfinger M, Taber HW. Genomic analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: applications to laboratory diagnosis and genotyping. Rev Med Microbiol 2005;16:49-58 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.revmedmi.0000166860.22075.56
  16. Rimek D, Tyagi S, Kappe R. Performance of an IS6110-based PCR assay and the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB PCR system for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA in human lymph node samples. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:3089-92 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.8.3089-3092.2002
  17. Fidler HM, Rook GA, Johnson NM, McFadden J. Mycobacterium tuberculosisDNA in tissue affected by sarcoidosis. BMJ 1993;306:546-9 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6877.546
  18. Singh KK, Muralidhar M, Kumar A, Chattopadhyaya TK, Kapila K, Singh MK, et al. Comparison of in house polymerase chain reaction with conventional techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in granulomatous lymphadenopathy. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:355-61 https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.53.5.355
  19. Ko KY, Lim MC, Huh CY. A case of retroperitoneal tuberculous lymphadenopathy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2004;47:759-62
  20. Kim SE, Kim CH, Park YB, Lee JY, Cho SJ, Shin HS, et al. Superior vena caval syndrome due to tuberculous lymphadenitis. Tuberc Respir Dis 2004; 57:368-71 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2004.57.4.368
  21. Kim KM, Lee AH, Choi KY, Oh SJ, Shim SI. Pathologic diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis in endoscopic biopsied material. Korean J Pathol 1997; 31:754-64
  22. Lee YJ, Yang SK, Myung SJ, Byeon JS, Park IG, Kim JS, et al. The usefulness of colonoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and pattern of concomitant extra-intestinal tuberculosis. Korean J Gastroenterol 2004;44:153-9
  23. Peter JB. The polymerase chain reaction: amplifying our options. Rev Infect Dis 1991;13:166-71 https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/12.5.166
  24. Persing DH. Polymerase chain reactions: trenches to benches. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:1281-5
  25. Shin WS. Diagnosis of tuberculosis: serodiagnosis and molecular biologic approach. Tuberc Respir Dis 1992;39:1-6