KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improved Modal Pushover Analysis of Multi-span Continuous Bridge Structures

다경간 연속 교량 구조물의 지진응답 평가를 위한 개선된 모드별 비탄성 정적 해석법에 관한 연구

  • 곽효경 (한국과학기술원 건설및환경공학과) ;
  • 홍성진 (한국과학기술원 건설및환경공학과) ;
  • 김영상 (국립안동대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2005.12.29
  • Accepted : 2006.03.10
  • Published : 2006.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, a simple but effective analysis procedure to estimate seismic capacities of multi-span continuous bridge structures is proposed on the basis of modal pushover analysis considering all the dynamic modes of structure. Unlike previous studies, the proposed method eliminates the coupling effects induced from the direct application of modal decomposition by introducing an identical stiffness ratio and an approximate elastic deformed shape. Moreover, in addition to these two introductions, the use of an appropriate distributed load {P} makes it possible to predict the dynamic responses for all kinds of bridge structures through a simpler analysis procedure. Finally, in order to establish the validity and applicability of the proposed method, correlation studies between rigorous nonlinear time history analysis and the proposed method are conducted for multi-span continuous bridges.

본 논문에서는 구조물의 모든 진동모드를 고려하는 모드별 비탄성 정적 해석법을 바탕으로 하여 다경간 연속 교량 구조물의 내진 역량을 평가할 수 있는 간단하고 효율적인 해석 방법을 제시하였다. 동일한 항복 후 기울기비와 근사 탄성변형 형상의 개념을 새롭게 도입하여 비탄성 구조계에 모드별 중첩이론을 직접 적용함으로써 발생하던 기존의 간섭 효과를 소거시켰다. 나아가 앞서 언급한 두 가지 개념과 적절한 분포하중을 정적 해석에 사용함으로써 더욱 간편한 해석 과정을 통하여 모든 종류의 교량 구조물에 대한 동적 거동을 예측하는 것이 가능해 졌다. 마지막으로 제안한 방법의 효용성과 적용성을 확인하기 위하여 4가지의 교량 모델에 대한 비선형 시간이력 해석과 간편화된 비선형 정적 해석의 변위예측 결과를 비교 분석하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 송종걸(2004) 역량스펙트럼 방법을 이용한 다자유도 교량의 비탄성 지진응답 평가, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제24권 제3A호, pp. 541-550
  2. Applied Technology Council (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC 40, Redwood City, CA
  3. Applied Technology Council (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, (FEMA 273); and NHERP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, (FEMA 274), ATC-33, Redwood City, CA
  4. Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V.V. (2004) Earthquake engineering from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton at Florida
  5. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1999) Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Research Center, University of California at Berkeley
  6. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, pp. 561-582 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  7. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation, Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, No. 4-6, pp. 452-464 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  8. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 10, pp. 357-379 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778
  9. Nassar, A.A. and Krawinkler, H. (1991) Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, Report No.95, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, CA
  10. Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A., and Nielsen, N.N. (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquake, Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 96, No. ST-12, pp. 2557-2573
  11. Usanmi, T., Lu, Z., Ge, H., and Kono, T. (2004) Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 1: Dynamic analysis approach, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 33, pp. 1337-1354 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.407
  12. Usanmi, T., Lu Z., Ge, H., and Kono, T. (2004) Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 2: Simplified verification procedure, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 33, pp. 1355-1372 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.406
  13. Zheng, Y., Usanmi, T., and Ge, H. (2003) Seismic response prediction of multi-span bridges through pushover analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 32, pp. 1259-1274 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.272