A Study on the Relationships between Complex and Preference by Perceptual-cognitive and Affective Judgement - Focused on the Commercial Interior Design -

지각적-인지적 판단과 감정적 판단에 따른 복잡성과 선호도의 관계 - 상업공간의 실내디자인을 중심으로 -

  • 최은희 (서울대학교 대학원 디자인학부) ;
  • 권영걸 (서울대학교 미술대학 디자인학부)
  • Published : 2006.06.01

Abstract

Design is inseparably related to aesthetics. In spite of that, it is difficult to explain the precise aesthetic variables that affect the aesthetic value of space or environment. Therefore, this study intended to find the relationships between aesthetic variables by perceptual and affective judgement for space design with focus on complexity and preference variables. The research found low level of 'arousing' as well as high levels of affective dimension variables 'pleasant' and 'relaxing' evoked high preference. High preference also appeared in space design cases with high unity, order, and clarity with low contrast and complexity, which are variables of perceptual dimension. Complexity, one variables of preference by Kaplan, is in an inverse proportion to space preference. Thus, space design with high complexity has high level of 'exciting' and 'arousing' affective responses and relatively low level of 'relaxing' response. Additionally, it was confirmed that the most importantly influential factor on complexity was diverse components rather than visual richness and ornamentation.

Keywords

References

  1. Fisher, Bell, Baum, Environmental Psychology, 2nd ed., Holt Reinhart Winston, NY, 1984
  2. Charles J. Holahan, Environmental Psychology, Random House: NY, 1982
  3. Altman & Zube, Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions, and Resources, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., 1975
  4. Irwin Altman & Ervin H. Zube, Public Places and Spaces, Plenum Press: NY
  5. Ervin H. Zube, Environmental Evaluation: Perception and Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, 1984
  6. Jack L. Nasar, Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors, Environment and Behavior, Vol.26 No.3, May 1994
  7. Jack L. Nasar, The Evaluative Image of City, SAGE Publications, 1998
  8. Jack L. Nasar, Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 1988
  9. Kathleen Gibson, Artificial Lighting and Environmental Preference as a Result of Visual Mystery and Complexity, Bulletin of 5th Asian Design Conference, 2003
  10. D. E. Berlyne, Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps towards an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, John Wiley & Sons, 1974
  11. Arnold Berleant, The Aesthetics of Environment, Temple University Press, 1992
  12. Allen Carlson, Aesthetics and the Environment: Appreciation od Nature, Art and Architecture, Routledge, 2000
  13. Hong Jung-Pyo, User's Aesthetic response to Direct, Mediating and Interactive Effects of Content Aesthetics and Form Aesthetics in Product Design, Doctoral dissertation of Chiba University, 2003
  14. 홍정표, 심미성 요소와 정량적 디자인 조사방법, 전북대출판부, 2006
  15. 다께우찌 도시오, 미학, 예술학사전, 미진사, 1993
  16. Robert Plutchik, 정서심리학, 박권생 역, 학지사, 2003