DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Design of Upper Deck Hatch Corner Insert Plates of Large Container Carriers

대형 컨테이너선 상갑판 해치코너부 보강판의 설계에 관한 연구

  • Park, Sung-Gu (Hull Initial Design Dept., Shipbuilding Div., Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Joo-Sung (School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, University of Ulsan)
  • 박성구 (현대중공업(주) 조선사업부 구조설계부) ;
  • 이주성 (울산대학교 수송시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2006.06.20

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to calculate the fatigue strength for upper deck hatch corner insert plate of large container carriers without wave load analysis and global finite element analysis at the initial design stage. Wave load analysis and global F.E. analysis for three container carriers have been performed by GL(Germanischer Lloyd) procedure to propose the equation for hatch corner stress range which is the important factor in fatigue strength calculation. Considering the restraining effect of bulkhead, three types of equation, that is, single tight bulkhead, double tight bulkhead and support bulkhead have been proposed. Using the proposed equations, a simplified fatigue analysis based on GL rules has been performed for two container carriers of which fatigue strength analysis was carried out by GL. From the comparison between fatigue strength result of using the proposed equations and that of GL, it has been found that proposed stress range equations are useful for scantling of upper deck hatch corner insert plates for over 8,000 TEU class container carriers.

Keywords

References

  1. 박성환, 이탁기, 이영만, 우제혁, 이희종, 2001. ' 컨테이너선의 비틂강도 해석에 관한 연구,' 대한조선학회 추계학술대회 논문집, pp. 327-333
  2. 정병훈, 류홍렬, 최병기, 2005. ' 초대형 컨테이너선의 구조 설계를 위한 비선형 파랑하중 생성 및 적용,' 대한조선학회 특별논문집, pp. 15-21
  3. 한국선급, 2005, 선급 및 강선규칙 적용지침 7 편 4 장 2 절 202
  4. American Bureau of Shipping. 2005. Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels. Part 5 Chapter 5 Section 3 5.1.5
  5. Det Norske Veritas, 2005, Rules for Ships. Part 5 Chapter 1 Section5 B206
  6. Elbatouti, A.M.T.. Jan. H.Y. and Stiansen. S.G., 1976. Structural Analysis ofa Containership Steel Model and Comparison with Test Results. Trans. SNAME, Vol.84
  7. Germanischer Lloyd, 2004, Rule for Classification and Construction. I Ship Technology. Part 1 Seagoing Ship. Chapter 1 Hull Structures
  8. Lloyd's Register of Shipping, 2004, Rules and Regulation for the Classification of Ships. Part3 Chapter8 Section 15
  9. Pedersen P.T., 1985, Torsional Response of Container Ships. Journal of Ship Research. pp. 194-205
  10. Yong Han Pan and Sung Y. Lu, 1983, Increase of Warping Rigidity in Open Sections of a Containership by Stiffening Plates. Journal of Ship Research. pp. 265-270