Effects of the Late Marriage of Korean Women on the First-birth Interval

우리나라 여성의 만혼(晩婚) 이 첫 출산간격에 미치는 영향

  • Chung, Woo-Jin (Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Kyoung-Ae (Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Mi (Department of Public Health, Yonsei University Graduate School)
  • 정우진 (연세대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 이경애 (연세대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 이선미 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과)
  • Published : 2006.05.01

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of women's late age of marriage on the interval between marriage and their first birth Methods: Data from Year 2000 Korea National Fertility Survey was collected through direct interview questionings, and the data was analyzed based on randomly selected sampling. In particular, the married women (N=5,648) were analyzed for the factors that determined the first-birth interval by performing Cox's proportional hazard model survival analysis. Results: Unlike previous findings, the woman whose age of marriage was 30 or more was more likely to delay the birth of her first baby than were the other women who married earlier. Further, a woman's age at marriage, a woman's residence before marriage, her husband's religion, her husband's level of education and the difference in age between the woman and her husband significantly influenced the first-birth interval. In contrast, for a married woman, her age, level of education, current residence and religion were not significant predictors of her first birth interval. Conclusions: Our study showed that women who married at the age of 30 years or more tend to postpone their first birth in Korea. When facing the increasing number of women who marry at a late age, the Korean government should implement population and social policies to encourage married women have their first child as early as possible.

Keywords

References

  1. 통계청. 인구동태통계연보. 2005
  2. Ryder NB. Components of Temporal Variations in American Fertility in Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies, vol. 19. Edited by Hiom RW. Symposium of the Society for the Study of Human Biology. London: Taylor & Fransis; 1980
  3. Bongaarts J, Feeney G. On the quantum and tempo of fertiIity. Popul Dev Rev 1998; 24(2): 271-291 https://doi.org/10.2307/2807974
  4. Bongaarts J. The end of the fertiIity transition in the developed world. Popul Dev Rev 2002; 28(3): 419-443 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00419.x
  5. Lesthaeghe R, Willems P. Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union? Popul Dev Rev 1999; 25(2): 211-228 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00211.x
  6. Eun KS. Age at marriage, marriage cohort and first birth interval. Korean J Sci 2001; 35(6): 105-139 (Korean)
  7. Feng W, Quanhe Y. Age at marriage and the first birth interval: the emerging change in sexual behavior among young couples in China. Popul Dev Rev 1996; 22(2): 299-320 https://doi.org/10.2307/2137436
  8. Brien MJ, Lillard LA. Education, marriage, and frist conception in Malaysia. J Hum Resour 1994; 29(4): 1166-1204
  9. Nath DC, Singh KK, Land KC, Talukdar PK. Age at marriage and length of fIrst-birth interval in traditional Indian society: life table and hazard model analysis. Hum Biol 1993; 65(5): 783-797
  10. Zheng Z. Social-demographic influence on first birth interval in China, 1980-1992. J Biosoc Sci 2000; 32(3): 315-327 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000003151
  11. Gangadharan L, Maitra P. The effect of education on the timing of marriage and first birth in Pakistan. J Quant Econ, University of Mumbai, Indian Econo Soci 2003; 1: 114-133
  12. Rindfuss RR, Morgan SP. Marriage, sex and first birth interval: the quiet revolution in Asia. Popul Dev Rev 1983; 9(2): 259-278 https://doi.org/10.2307/1973052
  13. Donaldson PJ, Nichols DJ. The changing tempo of fertility in Korea. Popul Stud 1978; 32(2): 231-250 https://doi.org/10.2307/2173559
  14. 조남훈, 김승권, 조애저, 장영식, 오영희. 1997년 전국 출산력 및 가족보건실태조사보고. 한국보건사회연구원; 1997
  15. Nath DC, Land KC, Goswami G. Effects of the status of women on the first-birth interval in Indian urban society. J Biosoc Sci 1999; 31: 55-69 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932099000553
  16. Marini MM. The effects of the timing of marriage and first birth. J Marriage Fam 1981; 43: 27-46 https://doi.org/10.2307/351415
  17. Bumpass L. Age at marriage as a variable in socioeconomic differentials in fertility. Demography 1969; 6: 45-54 https://doi.org/10.2307/2060099
  18. Nguyen L, Nguyen MT, Ingrid S, Pham BS. Selected determinants of fertility in Vietnam: age at marriage, marriage to first birth interval and age at first birth. J Biosoc Sci 1993; 25: 303-310
  19. 권태환, 김태헌, 김두섭, 전광희, 은기수. 한국 출산력 변천의 이해. 일산사; 1997
  20. Mukerjee BN. Status of women as related to family planing. J Popul Res 1975; 2(1): 5-33
  21. Chaudhury RH. Socio-cultural Factors affecting Practice of Contraception in a Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh. In: Fertility in Bangladesh: which Way is it going? Held at Cox's Bazaar, Bangladesh; 1976, December 21-23
  22. United Nations. Population Change, Women's Role and Status Development. Asian Population Studies Series No. 128. New York; 1994
  23. Caldwell JC. Education as a factor in mortality decline: an examination of Nigerian data. Popul Stud 1979; 33: 395-413 https://doi.org/10.2307/2173888
  24. Anker R. Research on Women's Role and Demographic Change. Survey Questionnaire for Household Women, Men and Communities with Background Explanations. ILO; 1982
  25. Mhloyi M. Status of Women, Population, and Development In: International Conference on Population and Development. IUSSP, Belgium; 1994
  26. Park JH, Kim SH, Chun BY, Kim GY, Yeh MH. Study of fertility and pregnancy wastage of women in rural area. Korean J Prev Med 1988; 21(1): 21-30 (Korean)