Treatment Characteristics of Biological Aerated Filter Process Using the Upflow and Downflow System

상향류 및 하향류 생물막여과공정의 처리특성에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2006.07.10
  • Accepted : 2006.11.07
  • Published : 2006.12.15

Abstract

This paper presents the test results of biological aerated filtration(BAF) process to replace activated sludge process by enhancing treated effluent quality and reducing the costs. In BAF process both BOD and SS compounds in wastewater are degraded and removed by biological reaction and filtration. Upflow BAF with expanded polypropylene media and downflow BAF with ceramic media were used to investigate the effects of hydraulic and organic loads on effluent quality. As a result, in BAF processes which has different media, upflow BAF reactor shows 5% higher efficiency than downflow BAF and this phenomena caused by backwashing methods and operational conditions. The results of influence factors analyzed by Factor Analysis Method in BOD and SS treatment efficiency are the size of media, hight of media bed and type of media. The quantitative effects of media size are 5.73% in TBOD, 5.78% in SBOD and 7.65% in TSS, so we confirmed the main factor is media size.

Keywords

References

  1. Adachi, S. and Fuchu, Y. (1991) Reclamation and reuse of wastewater by biological aerated filter process, Water Science and Technology, 24, 195-204
  2. PHA, AWWA, WEF. (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th Ed., APHA, Washington, DC
  3. Boller M., Guger W. and Tschui M. (1993) Parameter affecting nitrifying biofilm reactor. Proc. IAWQ 2nd International Specialized Conf. on Biofilm Reactors, Paris, 15
  4. Canler, J.P. and Perret, J.M. (1994) Biological aerated filter; assessment of the process based on 12 sewage treatment plants, Water Science and Technology, 29, 13-22
  5. Capdeville, B., Melo, L.F. and Bott, T.R. (1992) Introduction to Biofilm in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Biofilm Science and Technology, 13-20
  6. Eckenfelder, W.W. (1961) Biological Waster Treatment, Pergamon press, New York
  7. McCarty, P. and Hang, R. (1971) Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater by Biological Nitrification and Denitrification. In: Microbial Aspects of Pollution, The Society for Applied Bacteriology Symposium Series, No.1, Academic Press, pp. 215-232
  8. McCoy, W.S. (1997) Biological aerated filters; a new alternative compact system, Water Environment & Technology, 9, 39-43
  9. Orr, P. and Lawty, R. (1990) Operating experience with large random packed biofilm reactors, Water Science and Technology, 22, 203-214
  10. Paul Mac Berthouex, Linfield C. Brown (1994) Statistics for Environmental Engineers, Lewis publishers, 151-160
  11. Pujol, R., Canler, J.P., Vachon, A. and Vidou, P. (1992) Biological aerated filetrs. an adapted biological process for wastewater from coastal areas, Water Science and Technology, 25, 175-184 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1992.0349
  12. Rittman, B.E., P.L. Mccart (1980) Evalution of Steady-State Biofilm Kinetics, Biothechno. Bioeng., 22, 2359-2373 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260221111