Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic Variation and Relationships of Korean Native Chickens and Foreign Breeds Using 15 Microsatellite Markers

  • Kong, H.S. (Animal Products Grading Service) ;
  • Oh, J.D. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Lee, J.H. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Jo, K.J. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Sang, B.D. (National Livestock Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Choi, C.H. (National Livestock Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Kim, S.D. (National Livestock Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Lee, S.J. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yeon, S.H. (National Livestock Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Jeon, G.J. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Lee, H.K. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2005.11.29
  • Accepted : 2006.05.02
  • Published : 2006.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the genetic variation and establish the relationship amongst breeds and strains using 15 chicken specific microsatellite markers. A total of 285 unrelated DNA samples from four Korean native chicken strains (Black strain of Korean native chicken; KL, Red Brown strain of Korean native chicken; KR, Ogol strain of Korean native chicken; KS and Yellow Brown strain of Korean native chicken; KY) and three introduced chicken breeds (F strain of White Leghorn; LF, K strain of White Leghorn; LK, Rhode Island Red; RC and Cornish; CN) were genotyped to estimate within and between breed genetic diversity indices. All the loci analyzed in 15 microsatellite markers showed a polymorphic pattern and the number of alleles ranged from 5 to 14. The polymorphism information content (PIC) of UMA1019 was the highest (0.872) and that of ADL0234 was the lowest (0.562). The expected total heterozygosity (He) within breed and mean number of observed alleles ranged from 0.540 (LF) to 0.689 (KY), and from 3.47 (LK) to 6.07 (KR), respectively. The genetic variation of KR and KY were the highest and the lowest within Korean native strains, respectively. The genetic distance results showed that Korean native chicken strains were separated with the three introduced chicken breeds clustered into another group. The lowest distance (0.149) was observed between the KR and KL breeds and the highest distance (0.855) between the KR and LK breeds. The microsatellite polymorphism data were shown to be useful for assessing the genetic relationship between Korean native strains and other foreign breeds.

Keywords

References

  1. Buchanan, F. C., L. J. Adams, R. P. Littlejohn, J. F. Maddox and A. M. Crawford. 1994. Determination of evolutionary relationships among sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genom. 22:397-403 https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1401
  2. Bowling, A. T. 1996. Nine equine dinucleotide repeats at micresatellite loci UCDEQ136, UCDEQ405, UCDEQ412, UCDEQ425, UCEDQ437, UCDEQ467, UCDEQ487, UCDEQ502 and UCDEQ 505. Anim. Genet. 28:370-371
  3. Dewoody, J. A. and J. C. Avise. 2000. Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. J. Fish Biol. 56:461-473 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00748.x
  4. Fan, B., Y. Z. Chen, C. Moran, S. H. Zhao, B. Liu, M. J. Zhu, T. A. Xiong and K. Li. 2005. Individual-breed Assignment Analysis in Swine Populations by Using Microsatellite Markers. Asian- Aust. J. Anim Sci. 18(11):1529-1534
  5. Groenen, M. A., H. H. Cheng, N. Bumstead, B. F. Benkel, W. E. Briles, T. Burke, D. W. Burt, L. B. Crittenden, J. Dodgson, J. Hillel, S. Lamont, A. P. de Leon, M. Soller, H. Takahashi and A. Vignal. 2000. A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 10(1):137-147
  6. MacHugh, D. E., R. T. Loftus, D. G. Barley, P. M. Sharp and P. Cunningham. 1994. Microsatellite DNA variation within and among European cattle breeds. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Series B. 256:25-31
  7. Martinez, A. M., J. V. Delgado, A. Rodero and J. L. Vega-pla. 2000. Genetic structure of the Iberian pig breed using microsatellite. Anim. Genet. 31:295-301 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00645.x
  8. Miller, S. A., D. D. Dykes and H. F. Polesky. 1988. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:1215 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.3.1215
  9. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Anim. Nat. 106:283-297 https://doi.org/10.1086/282771
  10. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and gentic distance from a small number of individuals. Genet. 89:583-590
  11. Osman, S. A. M., M. Sekino, M. Nishibori, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2005. Genetic Variability and Relations of Native Japanese Chickens Assessed by Microsatellite DNA Profiling. -Focusing on the Breeds Established in Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Asian-Aust. J. Anim Sci. 18(6):755-761 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.755
  12. Ota, T. 1993. DISPAN. Pennsylvania Utate University, PA. USA
  13. Pandey, A. K., M. S. Tanita, D. Kumar, B. Misra, P. Choudhary and R. K. Vijh. 2002. Microsatellite analysis of three poultry breeds of India. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1536-1542 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1536
  14. Park, S. 2000. Microsatellite Toolkit For MS Excel 97 or 2000 (personnel communication)
  15. Sirchia, S. M., I. Garagiola, C. De-Andreis, I. Gazzoli, M. Gramegna and G. Colucci. 1996. Characterization of four microsatellites in an Italian population and their application to paternity testing. Mol. Cell Probes. 10(2):155-158 https://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1996.0021
  16. Sneath, P. H. A. and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman, San Francisco, USA
  17. Tautz, D. 1989. Hypervariability of simple sequence as a general source gor for polymorphic DNA marker. Nuleic Acids Res. 17(16):6463-6447 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.16.6463
  18. Yoon, D. H., J. D. Oh, J. H. Lee, H. S. Kong, B. W. Cho, J. D. Kim, K. J. Jeon, C. Y. Jo, G. J. Jeon and H. K. Lee. 2005. Establishment of individual identification system based on the microsatellite polymorphism in Hanwoo. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18(6):762-766 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.762

Cited by

  1. Genetic Diversity Among Turkish Native Chickens, Denizli and Gerze, Estimated by Microsatellite Markers vol.46, pp.7-8, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-008-9164-8
  2. Genetic Diversity and Relationships of Korean Chicken Breeds Based on 30 Microsatellite Markers vol.27, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14016
  3. Uncovering Genomic Features and Maternal Origin of Korean Native Chicken by Whole Genome Sequencing vol.9, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114763
  4. DNA Markers for the Genetic Diversity in Korean Native Chicken Breeds: A Review vol.43, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.2.63
  5. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Discovery in GHSR Gene and Their Association Analysis with Economic Traits in Korean Native Chickens vol.43, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.4.273
  6. The breeding history and commercial development of the Korean native chicken vol.73, pp.01, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391600088X
  7. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium and analysis of genetic diversity in Korean chicken lines vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192063
  8. Comparative Analysis of Meat Quality Traits of New Strains of Native Chickens for Samgyetang vol.45, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.3.175
  9. Genetic Diversity and Relationship of Ogye Population in Korea Using 25 Microsatellite Markers vol.45, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.3.229
  10. Genetic Diversity of Wild Quail in China Ascertained with Microsatellite DNA Markers vol.20, pp.12, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1783
  11. Production of Kids from In vitro Fertilized Goat Embryos and Their Parentage Assessment Using Microsatellite Markers vol.20, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.842
  12. Genetic Relationship in Chicken Breeds Using Molecular Co-ancestry Information vol.21, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.60610
  13. Population Structure and Biodiversity of Chinese Indigenous Duck Breeds Revealed by 15 Microsatellite Markers vol.21, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70100
  14. Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers in Tsaiya Duck vol.21, pp.5, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70366
  15. Study on Genetic Diversity of Six Duck Populations with Microsatellite DNA vol.21, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70367
  16. Genomic Heterogeneity of Chicken Populations in India vol.21, pp.12, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80299
  17. Genetic Diversity of a Chinese Native Chicken Breed, Bian Chicken, Based on Twenty-nine Microsatellite Markers vol.23, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90367
  18. Comparison of the Chemical Composition, Textural Characteristics, and Sensory Properties of North and South Korean Native Chickens and Commercial Broilers vol.30, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.2.171
  19. ISAG-recommended Microsatellite Marker Analysis Among Five Korean Native Chicken Lines vol.54, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2012.54.6.401
  20. Brief Review on Local Chicken Breeds in Korea with Respect to Growth Performance and Meat Quality vol.13, pp.11, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2014.662.664
  21. 초위성체 마커를 활용한 가축다양성정보시스템(DAD-IS) 등재 재래닭 집단의 유전적 다양성 분석 vol.46, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2019.46.2.65
  22. Deciphering the Patterns of Genetic Admixture and Diversity in the Ecuadorian Creole Chicken vol.9, pp.9, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090670
  23. Determination and comparison of growth performance parameters between two crossbred strains of Korean native chickens with a white semi broiler chicken for 84 days post-hatch vol.47, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200016
  24. Design and development of a multiplex microsatellite panel for the genetic characterisation and diversity assessment of domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) vol.19, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2020.1745695