참고문헌
- Deb, S. M., M. Gurnani and C. T. Chacko. 1998. Comparison of sire evaluation methods under field conditions. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 51(4):210-215
- Dempfle, L. 1977. Comparison of several sire evaluation methods in dairy cattle breeding. Livestock Prod. Sci. 4(2):129-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(77)90030-6
- Deulkar, P. B. and M. D. Kothekar. 1999. Sire evaluation considering first lactation yield for improvement of lifetime production in Sahiwal. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69(4):240-242
- Gandhi, R. S. and M. Gurnani. 1991. Accuracy of different methods of sire evaluation in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Vet. J. 68(7):659-662
- Gaur, G. K., V. N. Tripathi, S. Mukherjee and V. K. Choudhary. 2001. Efficiency of sire evaluation procedures in Frieswal cattle. Indian J. Vet. Res. 10(2):1-6
- Harvey, W. R. 1987. Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. ARS H-4, USDA, Washington, DC
- Henderson, C. R. 1975. Use of relationship among sires to increase accuracy of sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 58(11):1731-1738 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84777-1
- Jain, A. and D. K. Sadana. 2000. Sire evaluation using animal model and conventional methods in Murrah buffaloes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13(9):1196-1200 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1196
- Meyer, K. 1989. Restricted Maximum Likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative-free algorithm. Genet. Select. Evol. 21:317-340 https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-21-3-317
-
Meyer, K. 1998. DFREML (Derivative Free Restricted Maximum Likelihood) Programme. Version 3.0
$\beta$ . User notes. University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia - Parekh, H. B. and M. Singh. 1989. Efficiency of different procedures of dairy sire evaluation using crossbred progeny. Indian J. Dairy. Sci. 42(3):482-488
- Robertson, A. and J. M. Randel. 1954. The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination. J. Agric. Sci. 44:184-192 https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960004627X
- Sahana, G. 1996. Effectiveness of sire evaluation methods for milk production along with auxiliary traits vis-à-vis other methods in crossbred cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Deemed University, Karnal, India
- Sahana, G. and M. Gurnani. 1999. Efficacy of auxiliary traits in estimation of breeding value of sires for milk production. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12(4):511-514 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.511
- Singh, P. K. and B. P. Singh. 1999. Efficacy of different methods in genetic evaluation of Murrah sires. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69(12):1044-1047
- Singh, R. 1992. Genetic evaluation of Sahiwal bulls on the basis of daughter's multiple traits under selection. M.Sc. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Deemed University, Karnal, India
- Tajane, K. R. and A. V. Rai. 1990. Efficiency of sire evaluation methods to improve milk yield of SahiwalxHolstein-Friesian cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 60(1):183-191
- Vij, P. K. and M. S. Tiwana. 1988. A note on evaluation of buffalo sires. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 41(4):500-501
피인용 문헌
- Breeding and conservation programmes for Sahiwal cattle genetic resources in the tropics: a review vol.49, pp.2078-6344, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633611000336
- Sire-maternal Grandsire Model and Sire Model in Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Average Daily Gain and Carcass Traits of Japanese Black Cattle vol.19, pp.12, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1678