The Information Search Method According to Eating-out Motivation of College Students in Eastern Area of Kangwon Province

강원도 영동권 지역 대학생들의 외식동기에 의한 정보탐색방법

  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

Although motivation and information search have both been studied continuously and separately as important marketing strategies, the relation between cause and effect has received little research attention. Therefore the objective of this study was to research the causal relationships between motivation and information search method. Frequency analysis and reliability analysis, factor analysis, and SEM(Structure Equation Model) were adopted to analyze the data. Motivation was divided into 5 factors which significantly influenced information search method. Factor 1, 'Reception and congratulation', influenced information search positively through 'newspaper, magazine', and 'word of mouth' but negatively through 'TV-advertising' and 'Flyer, Press copy'. Factor 2, 'Change of dietary life', influenced positively 'TV-advertising'. Factor 3, 'Economic saving', influenced positively 'newspaper, magazine', and 'the e-mail's advertising' Factor 4, 'Preference motivation', influenced negatively 'word of mouth' Factor 5, 'Advertisement and companion's need', influenced positively 'newspaper, magazine', and 'the e-mail's advertising' but negatively 'TV-advertising' As a result, customers appeared to choose various information search methods according to their eating-out motivation. 'The e-mail's advertising', and 'word of mouth' are popular among customers' information search methods. Therefore, food-service corporations need to try eliminating negative images of various advertisements and activate positive word of mouth marketing, promotion through internet.

Keywords

References

  1. 김헌희. 2003. 외식 프랜차이즈 경영전략. 백산출판사, pp 9-37
  2. 노형진. 2003. SPSS/AMOS에 의한 사회조사분석. 형설출판사, pp 274-283
  3. 식품유통연감.2002. 식품저널편집부, pp 98-122/ 2004, pp 100-105
  4. 한국외식산업연감. 2002. 한국음식업중앙회, pp 294-302
  5. Assael H. 2004. Consumer Behavior. Houghton Mifflin Company Boston. 182-202
  6. Baek YC. 2001. A study on the relation between family restaurant choice attributes and the influential factors. Korean Journal of Hospitality Administration 10(1) : 95-117
  7. Barbara E.K, Alice MI. 1993. The Influence of Positive Affect on Variety Seeking Among Safe, Enjoyable Products. Journal of Consumer Research 20(2) September: 257-270 https://doi.org/10.1086/209347
  8. Duff M. 2005. Word-of-mouth aids growing store base, Drug Store News May 2(27) : 130-131
  9. Kim HY, Lee SH. 2003. Cognition and Satisfaction of Customer in Home-delivered Meal. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci 19(4) : 529-538
  10. Kim MS. 2005. Eating Behavior of University Students by Economic Environment. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci . 21(2) : 125-138
  11. Ko SH, Kim SK, Kim DK, Kim BJ. 2005. Importance on the sanitation and cleanliness of family restaurant employees. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci 21(2) : 155-162
  12. Laroche M, Gorcon HG, Bergeron MJ, Yang Z(2004). Exploring how intangibility affects perceived risk. Journal of Service Research May 6(4): 373-389 https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503262955
  13. Lee JK, Jeanne MH. 2000. Relationships among information search activities when shopping for a credit car. The Journal of Consumer Affairs(Winter) 34(2) : 330-360 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2000.tb00097.x
  14. Mittal B. 1993. Testing consumers behavior theories: LISREL is not a panacea. Advances in Consumer Research 20 : 647-653
  15. Nissim H, Wozniak R. 2001. Consumer Behavior(An applied approach). Prentice-Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 212-230
  16. Park HS. 2005. Research Trends on International Journal of Tourism Sciences with SEM. Journal of Tourism Sciences 29(1) : 267-286
  17. Schmidt JB, Spreng RA. 1996. A proposed model of external consumer information search. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, Summer 24(3) : 246-256 https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396243005
  18. Schultz SK. 1995. How is a possession 'Me' or 'Not me'? characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment. Journal of consumer research (December) : 327-343
  19. Solomon RM. 2002. Consumer Behavior. Prentice Hall. 262-267
  20. Sridhar M, Brian TR, Debabrata T. 1997. Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research(March) 23(4) : 263-277 https://doi.org/10.1086/209482
  21. Srinivasin N, Brian TR 1991. An empirical rest of a model of external search for automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research 18(September) : 233-242 https://doi.org/10.1086/209255
  22. Terence AS, Ellnora WS. 2004. The role of disgust as an emotional advertising effects. Journal of Advertising Spring 33(1) : 43-53 https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639150
  23. Traci G. 2005. Local firm pushes word-of-mouth advertising. The Business Journal - Central New York. Syracuse Aug (19)33 : 5-13
  24. Wasserman T. 2005. Blogs Cause Word of Mouth Business to Spread Quickly. Brandweek Oct, 46(35) : 9-10
  25. Wayne DH, Deborah JM. 2001. Consumer Behavior. Houghton Miffline Company. 52-77
  26. Yang WJ, Park HJ. 2002. A Study On the Relationship of the Fast Food Selection Attributes and the Use Behaviors. Korean Journal of Tourism and leisure 12(2) : 107-124
  27. Yum JC, Kang YI. 2005. A study on the customer's information research behavior. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research 11(1) : 70-86