FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH TO INVESTIGATE THE INFLUENCE OF THE DESIGN CONFIGURATION OF THE ITI SOLID IMPLANT ON THE BONE STRESSES DURING THE OSSEOINTEGRATION PROCESS

유한요소해석을 통한 ITI Solid screw 임플랜트의 형상 특성이 골유착 단계에서 응력에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구

  • Cha Sang-Bum (Major in Prosthodontics Department of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee Kyu-Bok (Major in Prosthodontics Department of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jo Kwang-Hun (Major in Prosthodontics Department of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 차상범 (경북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조광헌 (경북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

Statement of problem: Standard type of ITI solid implant model in the 6.2mm thick jaw bone was axisymmetrically modelled for finite element stress analyses. Purpose: Primary objective was to investigate the influences or the characteristic design configuration of the ITI solid implant model on the bone stress with the course of osseointegration process at the bone/implant interfaces. To simulate the characteristics of the osseointegration process, five different stages of the bone/implant interface model were implemented. As load conditions, vertical load of 50N was taken into consideration. Bone at the cervical region of implant was the areas of concern where the higher level of stress were likely to take place. Results: The results indicated that rather slightly different stress level could be obtained as a function of the osseointegration conditions. Conclusion: Under vertical load, the lower level of stress was observed at the cervical cortical bone in the initial and final stages of osseointegration. Relatively higher stress level, however, was observed during the transitional stages where the osseointegration at the cancellous bone interface were yet to fully develop.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI. Breine U, Lindstrom J, Adell R, Hansson BO, Ohlsson A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969:3:31-100
  2. LeGeros RZ and Craig RG. Strategies to affect bone remodelling. J Bone Miner Res 1993 :8: 583-593 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650080509
  3. Chamay A and Tschantz P. Mechanical influences in bone remodelling. Experimental research on Wolff slaw. J Biomech 1972:5: 173-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(72)90053-X
  4. Lindquist LW, RockIer B and Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissueintegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988 :59: 59-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90109-6
  5. Eunsu J, Kwanghun J and Cheonghee L. A finite element stress analysis of the bone around implant following cervical bone resorption. J Korean Academy of Implant Dentistry 2003; 22: 38-47
  6. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In Branemark PI. Zarb GA. Albrektsson T (edi) : Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence 1985:199-209
  7. NISA II / DISPLAY III User's Manuel, Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation (EMRC)
  8. Byounghwa M and Jaeho Y. A study on the stress analysis of three root-form implants with finite element analysis. J Korean Academy of Implant Dentistry 1992: 12: 116-128
  9. Borchers L and Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983:62:155-159 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021401
  10. Kinni ME, Hokama SN and Capto AA. Force transfer by osseointegration implant device. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987:2:11-14
  11. Cook SD, Weinstein AM and Klawitter JJ. A three dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant. J Dent Res 1982:61:25-29 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610010501
  12. Nicolella DP, Lankford J, Jepsen K, Davy DT. Correlation of physical damage development with microstructure and strain localization in bone. In: Chandran KB, Vendervy R Jr, Hefzy MS (eds) : 1997 Bioengineering Conference. New York: ASME 1997:37:311-312
  13. Chulsu K. Mansup L, Kuiwon C. Improved stress analyses of dental implant system by homogenization technique. J Korean Academy of Periodontology 1997: 27: 263-290 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.1997.27.1.263
  14. Lavernia CJ, Cook SD, Weinstein AM and Klawitter JJ. An analysis of stress in dental implant system. J Biomech 1981:14:555-560 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(81)90005-1
  15. Rieger MR. Mayberry M and Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990:63:671-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90325-7
  16. Richter EJ, In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1995: 10: 99-108
  17. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P and Bayne SC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996:67:633-640
  18. Chonghun H, HungJae C, Sinyoung J. Seongjoo H, Yongchang C. Chongpyung C, Young K, Inchul R. Myungho K. Studies of osseointegrated implant-models on stress distribution. J Korean Academy Prosthodontics 2000: 38: 526-542
  19. Doyung P. Cheonghee L and Kwanghun J. Three dimensional stress analysis around osseointegrated Branemark implant system using an axisymmetric modelling approach. J of Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2002:18:21-30
  20. Amtmann E. The distribution of the breaking strength in the femur. J Biomech 1968: 1: 271-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(68)90022-5
  21. Cabrini RL. Gugliemotti MB. Almago JC. Histomorphometry of initial bone healing around Zirconium implants in rats. Implant Dent 1993:2:264-267 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199312000-00008
  22. Sahin S. Akagawa Y. Wadamoyo M, Sato Y. The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant II: A monphometric evaluation after three months of loading. J Prosthet Dent 1996:76:242-252