The Relationship between Self-report, Hypothetical Interview, and Observation about Conflict Resolution Strategies between Friends

친구간 갈등해결방식에 대한 자기 보고와 실제 행동의 관계

  • 김송이 (연세대학교 어린이생활지도연구원)
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

The purposes of this study were firstly to assess the differences of conflict resolution strategies between friends according to children's peer status, and secondly to investigate the relationship of conflict resolution strategies measured by self-report, hypothetical interview, and observation methods. Thirty-four dayds in elementary 5th graders were selected according to peer status and friendship. Collected data were analyzed tv t-test and Spearman's correlation. The results of this study showed that children's conflict resolution strategies differed according to their peer status. Specially, popular children reported using and experiencing compromising/integrating strategies more than rejected children did. Rejected children reported using and experiencing dominating strategies more than popular children did. Secondly, there were meaningful correlations between compromising/integrating and dominating strategies, as measured by self-report, hypothetical interview, and observation methods. However, no relations emerged among avoiding, obliging, and intervention requesting strategies, as measured by self-report, hypothetical interview, and observation methods.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경희(1986). 아동심리학. 서울: 박영사
  2. 김송이, 박경자(2001). 또래 지위와 친구 관계에 따른 아동의 갈등 해결 방식. 아동학회지한국, 22(4), 69-84
  3. 배선영(1999). 아동의 친구관계의 질과 갈등해결전략의 관계. 연세대학교 석사학위 청구논문
  4. 정선진(2000). 학령기 아동의 행동문제와 또래지위 및 친구 관계의 질. 연세대학교 석사학위 청구논문
  5. 한제인(1994). 아동의 사회측정 지위에 따른 갈등해결전략 사용에 대한 연구. 숙명여자대학교 석사학위청구논문
  6. Chung, T., & Asher, S. R. (1996). Children's goals and strategies in peer conflict situation. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 42, 125-147
  7. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-282
  8. DeHart, G. B. (1999). Conflict and averted conflict in preschoolers' interactions with siblings and friends. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 281-304). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  9. Eisenberg, A. R., & Garvey, C. (1981). Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4, 149-170 https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538109544512
  10. Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1993). Conflict and context in peer relations. In C. Hart (Ed.), Children on playgrounds: Research perspectives and applications (pp. 44-84). Ithaca: SUNY Press
  11. Hartup, W. W., Laursen, B., Stewart, M. I., & Eastenson, A. (1988). Conflict and the friendship relations of young children. Child Development, 59, 1590-1600 https://doi.org/10.2307/1130673
  12. Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, E, & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94-104 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.94
  13. Iskandar, N., Laursen, B., Finkelstein, B., & Fredrickson, L. (1995). Conflict resolution among preschool children: The appeal of negotiation in hypothetical disputes. Early Childhood and Development, 6(4), 359-376
  14. Putallaz, M., Hellstern, L., Sheppard, B. H., Grimes, C. L., & Glodis, K. A. (1995). Conflict, social competence, and gender: Maternal and peer contexts. Early Education and Development, 6(4), 433-448 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed0604_8
  15. Rabiner, D. L., Lenhart, L., & Lechman, J. E. (1990). Automatic versus reflective social problem solving in relation to children's sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 26, 1010-1016 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.1010
  16. Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368-376 https://doi.org/10.2307/255985
  17. Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (1999). Children's goals and strategies in response to conflict within a friendship. Developmental Psychology, 35, 69-79 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.69