지르코니아/알루미나 복합 지대주의 생물학적 안정성에 관한 연구

Biological stability of Zirconia/Alumina composite ceramic Implant abutment

  • 배규현 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 한증석 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김태일 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 설양조 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이용무 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 구영 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 조기영 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정종평 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 한수부 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 류인철 (서울대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Bae, Kyu-Hyun (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk. (Department of Prosthdontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Il (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seol, Yang-Jo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Moo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ku, Young (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Ki-Young (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chung, Chong-Pyoung (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Soo-Boo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Rhyu, In-Chul (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.30

초록

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the biological stability of the zirconia/alumina composite abutment by histologic and radiographic examination in clinical cases. 17 partially edentulous patients (5 men and 12 women, mean age 47) were treated with 37 implants. The implants were placed following the standard two-stage protocol. After a healing period of 3 to 6 months, zirconia/alumina composite abutments were connected. All radiographs were taken using paralleling technique with individually fabricated impression bite block, following insertion of the prosthesis and at the 3-, 6-, 12 month re-examinations. After processing the obtained images, the osseous level was calculated using the digital image in the mesial and distal aspect in each implant. An ANOVA and t-test were used to test for difference between the baseline and 3-, 6-, 12 months re-examinations, and for difference between maxilla and mandible. Differences at P <0.05 were considered statistically significant. For histologic examination, sample was obtained from the palatal gingiva which implant functioned for 12 months. Sections were examined under a light microscope under various magnifications. Clinically, no abutment fracture or crack as well as periimplantitis was observed during the period of study. The mean bone level reduction(${\pm}standard$ deviation) was 0.34 rom(${\pm}\;0.26$) at 3-months, 0.4 2mm(${\pm}\;0.30$) at 6-months, 0.62 mm(${\pm}\;0.28$) at 12-months respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between baseline and 3-, 6-, 12-months re-examinations (p > 0.05). The mean bone level reduction in maxilla was 0.33(${\pm}0.25$) at 3-months, 0.36(${\pm}0.33$) at 6-months, 0.56(${\pm}0.26$) at 12-months. And the mean bone level reduction in mandible was 0.35(${\pm}0.27$) at 3-months, 0,49(${\pm}0.27$) at 6-months, 0.68(${\pm}0.30$) at 12-months. No statistical difference in bone level reduction between implants placed in the maxilla and mandible. Histologically, the height of the junctional epithelium was about 2.09 mm. And the width was about 0.51 mm. Scattered fibroblasts and inflammatory cells, and dense collagen network with few vascular structures characterized the portion of connective tissue. The inflammatory cell infiltration was observed just beneath the apical end of junctional epithelium and the area of direct in contact with zirconia/alumina abutment. These results suggest the zirconia/alumina composite abutment can be used in variable intraoral condition, in posterior segment as well as anterior segment without adverse effects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PHJ, Pollizi G, Zarb GA, Hermann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1991;6:29-36
  2. Heydecke G, Sierraalta M, Razzoog ME. Evolution and use of aluminium oxide single-tooth implant abutment: A short review and presentation of two cases. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:448-493
  3. Rasperini G, Magnolione M, Cocconcelli P, Simion M. In vivo plaque formation on pure titanium and ceramic abutment: A comparative microbiological SEM analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:357-364 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090601.x
  4. Johnson RH, Persson GR. A 3-year prospective study of a single-tooth implant-Prosthodontic complication. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:183-189
  5. Prestino V, Ingber A. Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part I. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:29-36 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00741.x
  6. Prestino V, Ingber A. Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part II. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:63-68 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00750.x
  7. Tripodakis AP, Strub JR, Kappert HF, Witkowski S. Strength and mode of failure of single-implant all-ceramic abutment restoration under static load. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:265-272
  8. Sadoun M, Perelmuter S. Alumina-zirconia machinable abutments for implant-supported single-tooth anterior crowns. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:1047-1053
  9. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthodont Dent 1992;68:322-326 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90338-B
  10. McLaren EA, White SN. Glass-infiltrated zirconia/alumina-based ceramic for crowns and fixed partial dentures. Prac Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:985-994
  11. Yildirim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O, Spiekermann H. Ceramic abutment-a new era in achieving optical esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:81-91
  12. Andersson B, Taylor A, Lang BR, Scheller H, Sch rer P, Sorenson JA, et al. Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:432-438
  13. Andersson B, Scharer P, Simion M, Bergstrom C. Ceramic implant abutments used for short-span fixed partial dentures: a prospective 2 year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:318-324
  14. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial-review. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  15. Drummond JR. In vitro aging of yttria-stabilized zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc 1989;72(4):675-676 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06194.x
  16. Kim DJ, Lee MH, Lee DY, Han JS. Mechanical properties, phase stability, and biocompatibility of (Y,Nb)-TZP/Al2O3 composite abutments for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53(4):438-443 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<438::AID-JBM19>3.0.CO;2-3
  17. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz P, -O, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721-727 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02513.x
  18. Moon I. -S, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lindhe J. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:658-663 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.261005.x
  19. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa, Biologic width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00520.x
  20. Hermann JS, Nummikoski PV, Schenk RK. Crestal bone change around titanium implants: A methodological study comparing linear radiographic with histomatric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:475-485
  21. Parsell DE, Gatewood RS, Watts JD, Streckfus CF. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1998;86:498-502 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90381-X
  22. Rawlinson A, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dry human mandibles. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:138-142 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260302.x
  23. Dove SB, McDavid WD, Hamilton KE. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2000;89:771-776 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106295
  24. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanim implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1412
  25. Naert I, Duyck J, Hosny M, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Evaluation of factors influencing the marginal bone stability around implants in the treatment of partial edentulism. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3(1):30-38 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00126.x