Smart Structures and Systems

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensor placement selection of SHM using tolerance domain and second order eigenvalue sensitivity

  • He, L. (School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Zhang, C.W. (School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Ou, J.P. (School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2005.03.12
  • Accepted : 2006.03.29
  • Published : 2006.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Monitoring large-scale civil engineering structures such as offshore platforms and high-large buildings requires a large number of sensors of different types. Innovative sensor data information technologies are very extremely important for data transmission, storage and retrieval of large volume sensor data generated from large sensor networks. How to obtain the optimal sensor set and placement is more and more concerned by researchers in vibration-based SHM. In this paper, a method of determining the sensor location which aims to extract the dynamic parameter effectively is presented. The method selects the number and place of sensor being installed on or in structure by through the tolerance domain statistical inference algorithm combined with second order sensitivity technology. The method proposal first finds and determines the sub-set sensors from the theoretic measure point derived from analytical model by the statistical tolerance domain procedure under the principle of modal effective independence. The second step is to judge whether the sorted out measured point set has sensitive to the dynamic change of structure by utilizing second order characteristic value sensitivity analysis. A 76-high-building benchmark mode and an offshore platform structure sensor optimal selection are demonstrated and result shows that the method is available and feasible.

Keywords

References

  1. Bayard, D. S., Hadaegh, F. Y. and Meldrum, D. (1988), 'Optimal experiment design for identification of large space structures', Automatica, 24(3), 357-364 https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(88)90076-3
  2. Came, T. G. and Dhormana, C. R. (1995), 'A modal test design strategy for model correlation', 13th IMAC, Nashvill, 927-933
  3. Cherng. A. P. (1999), 'Optimal sensor placement for modal parameter identification using signal subspace correlation techniques', 17th IMAC, Kissimme, 855-861
  4. Cobb, R. G. and Liebst, B. S. (1996), 'Sensor location prioritization and structural damage location using minimal sensor information', AIAA J., 35(2), 369-374
  5. Fox, R. L. and Kapoor, M. P. (1968), 'Rates of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors', AIAA J., 24-26
  6. Gantmacher. (1971), The Theory of Matrices, New York Chelsea Publishing. 78-79
  7. Hemez, F. M. and Farhat, C. (1994), 'An energy based optimum sensor placement criterion and it's application to structural damage detection', 12th IMAC, Honolulu. 1568-1575
  8. Kammer, D. C. (1991), 'Sensor placement for on orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures', AIAA J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14(2), 251-259 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20635
  9. Kim, H. B. and Park, Y. S. (1997), 'Sensors placement guide for structural joint stiffness model improvement', Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 11(5), 651-672 https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1997.0108
  10. Larson, C. B., Zimmerman, D. C. and Marek, E. L. (1994), 'A comparison of modal test planning techniques: excitation and sensor placement using NASA 8-Bay truss', 12th IMAC, Honolulu. 205-211
  11. Lew, J. S. (1999), 'Effects of identification parameter uncertainty on structural damage detection', 17th IMAC, Kissimme. 1991-1997
  12. Lim, T. W. (1991), 'Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification', Proceedings of 32nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structural, Structural Dynamic, and Material Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, 521-530.
  13. Manson, G. and Worden, K. (2001), 'Sensors optimization for a damage location problem', 19th IMAC, Orlando, 1226-1233
  14. Shah, P. C. and Udwadia, F. E. (1978), 'Methodology for optimal sensor location for identification of dynamic system', J. Appl. Mech. 45(3), 188-196 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3424225
  15. Tongco, E. and Meldrum, D. (1996), 'Optimal sensors placement of large flexible space structures', AIAA J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 19(4), 961-963 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21725
  16. Udwadia, F. E. and Garba, J. A. (1985), 'Optimal sensor location for structural identification', Proceedings of JPL Workshop on Identification and Control of Flexible Space Structure. 247-261
  17. Yap, K. C. and Zimmerman, D. C. (2000), 'Optimal sensors placement for dynamic model correlation', 18th IMAC, Bethel. 607-612

Cited by

  1. Study on the Sensitive Factors of Structural Nonlinear Damage Based on the Innovation Series vol.20, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455420420110