Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development of Balanced Scorecards Model based on the Strategic Plan of the Rod Library, UNI

전략적 계획을 기반으로 한 BSC 모형 개발 -Rod Library 사례를 중심으로-

  • Cho, Yoon-Hee (College of Business Administration, University of Northern Iowa)
  • Published : 2006.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The University of Northern iowa Rod Library has mission statement that a personalized learning environment founded on the strong liberal arts curriculum and to supporting an intellectually and culturally diverse community. The Rod Library has been developing the strategic plans by 5 years since 1987 Recently, the strategy has been faced need to measure of performance how much does make it up. This study developed the BSC model and the strategy map that analyze the strategic plan 2004-2009 of the University of Northern iowa Rod library and transfer the strategy into the four perspectives of BSC. In addition, this study presented the success performance indicators measuring the strategic goals of each perspectives and the cause-effect model driving the lead indicators of performance.

북아이오와주립대학 도서관은 우수한 교양 커리큘럼을 지원하는 개별화 학습 환경과 다양한 지적, 문화적 커뮤니티를 지원하는 것을 사명으로 하고 있다. 1987년부터 전략적 계획을 수립하기 시작하여 현재 5년 단위로 전략적 계획을 수립하고 있으며, 최근 전략이 어느 정도 달성되고 있는가에 대한 성과측정의 필요성이 제기되었다. 이에 본 연구는 북아이오와주립 대학도서관의 최근 전략적 계획 2004-2009의 내용을 분석하여 전략을 균형성과표의 네 관점으로 전환하는 BSC 모형과 전략지도를 개발하였다. 이와 함께 각 관점별 전략적 목적을 측정하는 핵심성과측정지표와 이를 이끄는 동인들의 인과관계 모형을 개발하여 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Access Services Department. 2005. Goals and objectives 2005-2006. [cited 2006. 1. 7]
  2. Collection Management and Special Services Department. 2005. Goals and objectives 2005-2006. [cited 2006. 1. 7
  3. Cribb, Gulcin. 2005. Human resource development : impacting on all four perspectives of the balanced scorecard. World Library and Information Congress : 71th IFLA General Conference and Council : Libraries - a voyage of discovery. IFLA [cited 2006. 1. 8].
  4. Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David R. 1992. 'The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance,' Harvard Business Review 70(1): 71-79
  5. Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David R 1996. 'Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy' California Management Review, 39(1) : 53-79 https://doi.org/10.2307/41165876
  6. Library Administrators Council. 1987. Results of strategic planning sessions. Cedar Falls Rod Library
  7. Library Administrators Council. 1989. Library's strategic plan. Cedar Falls: Rod Library
  8. Library Information Technologies. 2005. Goals and objectives, FY2006. [cited 2006. 1. 7]
  9. Library Strategic Planning Committee. 1990. The strategic plan of the Donald O. Rod Library. Cedar Falls: Rod Library
  10. Library Strategic Planning Committee. 1994. Strategic plan: five years report. Cedar Falls : Rod Library
  11. Library Strategic Planning Committee. 2000. Rod Library strategic plan 1995-2000. Cedar Falls : Rod Library
  12. Library Strategic Planning Committee. 2002. Rod Library strategic plan 2001-2006. Cedar Falls : Rod Library
  13. Library Strategic Planning Committee. 2003. Rod Library strategic plan 2004-2009. Cedar Falls : Rod Library
  14. Naven, Paul R. 2002. Balanced scorecard step-by-step. New York: John Wiley & Sons
  15. Peterson, Gerald, 1996. Library facilities and service at UNI, 1876-1907. [cited 2006. 1. 7].
  16. Poll, Roswitha. 2001. 'Performance, process and costs : managing service quality with the balanced scorecard' Library Trends. 49(4) : 709-717
  17. Poll, Roswitha. 2003. 'Managing service quality with the balanced scorecard.' Advances in Library Administration and Organization. 20 : 213-227
  18. Reference and Instructional Services Department. 2005. Goals and objectives 2005-2006. [cited 2006. 1. 7]
  19. Rod Library, 2005a. Rod Library major library-wide or cross-depart mental initiatives 2005-2006. Cedar Falls : Rod Library
  20. Rod Library, 2005b. Rod Library strategic plan 2004-2009. [cited 2006. 1. 7]
  21. Self, Jim. 2003. Using data to make choices : the balanced scorecard at the University of Virginia Library. [cited 2006. 1. 8]
  22. Self, Jim. 2004. 'Metrics and management applying the results of the balanced scorecard.' Performance Measurement and Metrics, 5(3) : 101-105 https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040410570111
  23. Technical Services Department. 2005. Goals and objectives 20052006. [cited 2006. 1. 7]
  24. University of Virginia Library. 2005. Balanced scorecard at UVa Library. [cited 2006. 1. 8].

Cited by

  1. Development of IT BSC-based Assessment System to Measure BIM Performance for Architectural Design Firms vol.32, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2016.32.1.3