DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학생들이 사용한 세 종류 NiTi file systems의 screw-in effect 비교

Comparison of screw-in effect of three NiTi file systems used by undergraduates

  • 오승희 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Oh, Seung-Hei (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.11.30

초록

학생들이 사용한 세 가지 NiTi file systems (ProFile$^{(R)}$, Hero Shaper$^{(R)}$, K3$^{TM}$)을 사용하여 성형한 모형 근관의 apical terminus width를 비교하여 flute angle 및 pitch 혹은 radial land가 screw-in effect에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 하였다. NiTi file의 사용 경험이 없는 부산대학교 치과대학 4학년 학생 50명이 세 종류의 NiTi file systems- Pro File$^{(R)}$ (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), K3$^{TM}$ (SybronEndo, Glendora, France), Hero Shaper$^{\circledR}$(Micromega, Besancon, France)-을 사용하여 각 system으로 하나의 근관씩, 모두 150 개의 레진 블락 근관모형 (Endo Training Bloc; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)을 16 : 1 감속 handpiece를 장착한 electric motor (Tecnika ATR, Pistola, Italy)를 사용하여 300 rpm의 속도에서 torque는 30 (Tecnikamotor setting value)으로 성형하였다. 스캐너로 근관 성형 전 후 이미지를 채득하여 중첩한 후 근단부의 최종 폭경을 측정하였다. 통계분석은 one-way ANOVA와 95% 신뢰도의 Scheffe's multiple range test로 사후 검증하였다. ProFile$^{(R)}$의 근관 성형 후 근단부의 폭이 Hero Shaper$^{(R)}$ and K3$^{TM}$에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 작았다. 본 연구의 결과에서 근단부의 과도한 확대가 variable pitch와 helical angle를 가진active file에 비해 con-stant pitch와 helical angle을 가짐에도 불구하고 radial land를 가진passive file에서 적게 나타났다. 이 결과로 추정해 볼 때, variable pitch와 helical angle보다는 근본적으로 radial land가 screw-in effect의 예방에 더 큰 역할을 하는 것으로 추정될 수 있다 따라서 NiTi file의 사용 경험이 없는 초심자의 경우 근단부 폭경의 유지능력이 좋은 ProFile$^{(R)}$의 사용이 추천된다.

The purposes of this study were to compare the apical terminus width of simulated curved root canal prepared with three NiTi file systems used by undergraduates for evaluation the effects of flute angle and pitch or radial land on reducing screw-in effect and to determine more safe NiTi file system for inexperienced operators. Fifty inexperienced undergraduate students prepared 150 simulated curved root canals in resin blocks with three NiTi file systems ; ProFile$^{(R)}$, Hero Shaper$^{(R)}$, K3$^{TM}$. The electric motor set at a speed of 300 rpm and torque of 30 in a 16 : 1 reduction handpiece was used. The simulated root canal was prepared to ISO #25 sizes with each file system. The scanned images of pre- and post-instrumented canal of resin block were superimposed. To evaluate the screw-in effect of three NiTi file systems, apical terminus width of root canal was measured from superimposed images and statistical analysis was performed. There were significant differences in three NiTi flle systems. ProFile$^{(R)}$ had significantly smaller width than Hero Shaper$^{(R)}$ and K3$^{TM}$"" (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between K3$^{TM}$ and Hero Shaper$^{(R)}$. Under the condition of this study, active file system (Hero SHaper$^{(R)}$, K3$^{TM}$) with variable pitch and helical angle had more screw-in effect than passive file system (ProFile$^{(R)}$) with constant pitch and helical angle. It seems that the radial lands play more important role in reducing screw-in effect.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 18:269-296, 1974
  2. Walton RE. Principle and practice of endodontics. 2nd ed., WB Saunders, Philadelphia, p201-203, 1996
  3. Peters GA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 30(8): 559-567, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
  4. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 21(4): 173-176, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1
  5. Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 30(6) :432-435, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00014
  6. Coleman CL, Svec TA. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals. J Endod 23(4) :232-235, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80053-2
  7. Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. lnt Endod J 34(6) :452-457, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00416.x
  8. Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary Nickeltitanium instruments and stainless steel hand KFlexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92(2) :215-220, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114622
  9. Hata G, Uemura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 28 (4) :316-321. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200204000-00014
  10. Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Trutt JE. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved root of molars. J Endod 30(4):234-237, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200404000-00013
  11. Johnson WB. Contemporary endodontics. Dentsply Asia, Hong Kong, p 1-6, 2002
  12. Machtou P, Ruddle CJ. Advancements in the design of endodontic instruments for root canal preparation. Alpha Omegan, 97(4) :8-15. 2004
  13. Mounce RE. The K3 rotary nickel-titanium file system. Dent Clin North Am 48:137-157, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.11.002
  14. Calas P. HEROShapers$^{\circledR}$: the adapted pitch concept. Endod Topic 10: 155-162, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00118.x
  15. Baumann MA, Roth A. Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88(6) :714-718, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70015-6
  16. Gluskin AH, Brown DC, Buchanan LS. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J 34(6) :476-484, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00422.x
  17. Ayar LR, Love RM. Shaping ability of Profile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J 37(9) :593-601. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00851.x
  18. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J 33(3) :248-254, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00287.x
  19. Hsu YY, Kim S. The ProFile system. Dent Clin North Am 48:69-85, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.11.006
  20. Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95(2) :228-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
  21. Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 25(6) :441-445, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80275-1
  22. Lloyd A. Root canal instrumentation with ProFile instruments. Endod Topic 10: 151-154, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00151.x
  23. Bergmans E, Van Cleynenbreul J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 14:324-333, 2001
  24. Gambarini G. The K3 rotary nickel titanium instrument system. Endod Topic 10: 179-182. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00119.x
  25. Schafer E, Florek H. Efficiency of rotary nickeHitanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Partl. Shaping ability in simulated curved canal. Int Endod J 36(3): 199-207, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00643.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of screw-in effect for several nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated resin root canal vol.35, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.4.267
  2. Influence of root canal curvature on the screw-in effect of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canal vol.35, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.5.374
  3. Influence of taper on the screw-in effect of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canal vol.35, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.5.380
  4. Mechanical and geometric features of endodontic instruments and its clinical effect vol.36, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.1.1