DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ccuracy Evaluation of MSD-related Risky Work Criterion of Korea Ministry ofLabor using Ergonomic Workload Evaluation Methods

인간공학적 작업부하 평가방법을 이용한 근골격계 부담작업 판정기준의 정확성 평가

  • Published : 2006.05.31

Abstract

The present study evaluated the accuracy of MSD-related work criterion of Korea Ministry of Labor by using ergonomic workload evaluation methods. 1,948 manufacturing works in automobile industry were divided into 1,286 MSD-related risky works and 662 risk-free ones by using RULA, ANSI Z-365 and perceived discomfort evaluation. Then, the two types of works were evaluated by Labor Ministry work criterion to analyze the classification accuracy of the work criterion. The work criterion of Korea Labor Ministry had low hit and false alarm ratio(20 and 11%) and high miss and correct rejection ratio(80 and 89%), and the odd ratios of hit and correct rejection were 0.2 and 8.3, respectively. It can be concluded that the work criterion of Korea Labor Ministry is a conservative evaluation method which tends to evaluate a target work as risk-free.

Keywords

References

  1. 노동부, 산업재해통계, 2004
  2. 노동부, 근골격계질환 예방 의무해설, 2004
  3. 전치혁, 이혜선, 정민근, 공학응용통계(개정판), 홍릉과학출판사, 2004
  4. American National Standards Institute, Control of work related cumulative trauma disorders(Z-365), Itasca, IL: National Safety Council, 1997
  5. Gescheider, G. A., Psychophysics the fundamentals(3th), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993
  6. McAtamney, L. and Corlett E. N., A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S

Cited by

  1. Evaluation Method of Physical Workload in Overhead Lifting Posture Using Surface EMG Analysis vol.32, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.9718/JBER.2011.32.4.328
  2. A Survey on the Workload Evaluation Methods and Their Applications to WMSD Work in Industries vol.29, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.4.435
  3. Ergonomics' Role for Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders vol.29, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.4.393
  4. Analysis of Utilization and Maintenance of Major Agricultural machinery (Tractor, Combine Harvester and Rice Transplanter) vol.30, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2018.30.4.292