Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain

  • 제31권2호
  • /
  • Pages.127-139
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 2288-9272(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-8493(eISSN)
대한안면통증구강내과학회 (Korean Academy of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine)
권호 표지

측두하악관절장애를 가진 환자에서의 삶의 질의 평가

Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patient with Temporomandibular Disorders

  • 정진숙 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 허윤경 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 최재갑 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실)
  • Jung, Jin-Suk (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hur, Yun-Kyung (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Choi, Jae-Kap (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

측두하악관절 장애를 가진 환자를 저작근 동통을 가진 환자와 관절강 내 동통을 가진 환자 그룹으로 구분하여, 두 그룹사이의 동통의 정도나 기간의 차이, 그리고 수면질의 차이에 따른 삶의 질의 차이를 비교하였다. 총 61명의 환자는 관절강 내 통증을 가진 환자 24명과 저작근 동통을 가진 환자 37명으로 구성되었다. 상기 환자들은 첫 내원 시 맥길 통증설문지(McGill Pain Questionnaire), 피츠버그 수면 질 평가 (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), SF-36 (Medical Outcome Study 36 Item Short Form Health Survey)을 작성하고 치과적 병력과 의과적 병력을 기록한 후, 전반적인 측두하악관절에 대한 검사를 시행하였다. 두 그룹 사이에는 동통의 강도나 기간에 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았으나, 6개월 이상 측두하악관절장애를 가지는 환자 중에서는 저작근 동통을 가진 환자가 관절강 내 동통을 가지는 환자보다 SF-36의 평균과 정신적인 부분에서의 점수에서 낮은 수치를 보인다(p<0.05). 피츠버그 수면 질 평가에서는 평사시의 수면 효율면에서 저작근 동통을 가진 환자 ($1.9459{\pm}0.8481$)가 관절강내 동통을 가지는 환자 ($1.375{\pm}0.9237$)에 비해 낮은 효율을 보인다. 또한 저작근 동통을 가진 환자군에서 피츠버그 수면 질 평가의 총점이 5이상인 나쁜 수면질을 가지는 군은 맥길 통증 설문지, SF-36에서 높은 동통 정도와 낮은 삶의 질을 가지는 것으로 결과가 도출되었다. 또한 저작근 동통을 가진 환자는 전체적인 삶의 질을 나타내는 SF-36에서는 감정적인 문제로 인한 역할의 제한, 생활력, 신체적 동통에서 관절강 내 동통을 가진 환자에 비해 낮은 수치를 나타내어, 삶의 질이 특히 정신적인 면에서 손상되었다는 것을 나타낸다.

Objectives: To explore the quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders and to evaluate it in terms of source and duration of the pain. Methods: A total of 61 patients with temporomandibular disorders participated in this study. According to pain source, they were divided into 2 groups, masticatory muscle pain (MMP) group and intracapsular pain (ICP) group. And each group was divided into acute phase group (pain duration <6 months) and chronic phase group (pain duration=6 months). The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to measure patients' quality of life. The scores for eight-scale profile and the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) of the SF-36 were compared between groups (MMP vs. ICP and acute vs. chronic). Student t-test was used to analyze the difference of the scores of the SF-36 between MMP and ICP groups. Results: MMP group showed significantly lower score in the 3 scales of the SF-36 (Role limitations due to emotional problems, Vitality, Bodily pain) when compared to ICP group. In acute phase there was no significant difference between MMP and ICP group in PCS as well as MCS scores, but in chronic phase MMP group showed significantly lower MCS score than ICP group. Conclusions: The masticatory muscle pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders,negatively influences the quality of life especially in chronic phase, and the mental components of quality of life are significantly interfered in the TMD patients with chronic masticatory muscle pain.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Reimer MA, Flemons WW. Quality of life in sleep disorders. Sleep Med Rev 2003;7(4);335-349 https://doi.org/10.1053/smrv.2001.0220
  2. Geigle R, Jones SB. Outcomes measurement: a report from the front. Inquiry 1990;27;7
  3. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item shortform health survery(SF-36). Med Care 1992;30; 473-483 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
  4. Katz N. The impact of pain management on quality of life; proceediings from the roundtable on 'the role of coxibs in successful pain management'. Jour of Pain and Symp Management 2002;24;38-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00411-6
  5. Mauro G, Tagliaferro G, Montini M, Zanolla L. Diffusion model of pain language and quality of life in orofacial pain patients. J Orofac Pain 2001;15;36-46
  6. Wittink H, Turk DC, Carr DB, et al. Comparison of the redundancy, reliability, and responsiveness to change among SF-36, Oswestry Disability Indes, and Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Clin J Pain 2004;20;133-142 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200405000-00002
  7. Cureje O, Von Korff M, Simon GE, et al. Persistent pain and well-being: A World Health Organization study in primary care. JAMA 1998;280;147-151 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.2.147
  8. Joke AM, Christel W, Alice AJ, et al. Stability of pain parameters and pain-related quality of life in adolescents with persistent pain: a three-year follow-up. Clin J Pain 2002;18;99-106 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200203000-00005
  9. Hunfeld JA, Perquin CW, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. Chronic pain and its impact on quality of life in adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Psychol 2001;26;145-153 https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/26.3.145
  10. Berker N, Thomasen AB, Olsen AK, et al. Pain epidemiology and health related quality of life in chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to a Danish multidisciplinary pain center. Pain 1997;73;3 93-400 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00126-7
  11. Lindroth JE, Schmidt JE, Carlson CR. A comparion between masticatory muscle pain patient and intracapsular pain patients on behavioral and psychosocial domains. J Orofac Pain 2002;16;277-283
  12. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, Von Korff MR. Research diagnostic criteria. J Cranio Disor Fac & Oral Pain 1992;6(4);327-334
  13. Carlson CR, Reid KI, Curran SL, et al. Psychological and Physiological parameters of masticatoy muscle pain. Pain 1998;76;297-307 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00063-3
  14. Korszum A, HindersteinB, Wong M. Comorbidity of depression with chronic facial pain and temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Radiol Endod 1996;82;496-500 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80192-2
  15. Epder J, Gatchel RJ. Coping profile differences in the biopshchosocial functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorder. Psychosom Med 2000; 62;69-75 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200001000-00010
  16. Yatani H, Studts J, Cordova M, Carlson CR, et al. Comparison of sleep quality and clinical and psychologic characteristics in patient with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2002;16;221-228
  17. Hagberg C, Hagberg M, Kopp S. Musculoskeletal symptoms and psychosocial factors among patients with craniomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52;170-177 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359409027592
  18. Smith MT, Perlis ML, Smith MS, Giles DE, Carmody TP. Sleep quality and presleep arousal in chronic pain. J Behav med 2000;23(1);1-13 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005444719169
  19. Nicassio P, Wallston KA. Longitudinal relationships among pain, sleep problems, and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. J Abnorm Psychol 1992;101(3); 514-520 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.101.3.514
  20. Buysse DJ, Reynolds III CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The pittsburgh sleep quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric paractice and research. Psychiatry Res 1988;28;193-213
  21. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1;277-299 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5
  22. Ware JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;25; 3130-3139 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008
  23. Elliott TE, Renier CM, Palcher JA. Chronic pain, depression, and quality of life: correlation and predictive value of the SF-36. Pain Med 2003;4(4); 331-339 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2003.03040.x
  24. Rudy TE, Turk DC, Kubinski JA, et al. Differential treatment responses of TMD patients as a function of psychological characteristics. Pain 1995;61;103-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00151-4