Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회지)

The Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회)
권호 표지

The Preferences for the Physical Features of Senior Congregate Housing

노인공동생활주택 개별주호 특성에 대한 예비노인의 선호 분석

  • Published : 2006.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the preferences for the physical features of senior congregate housing. The survey was conducted among middle-aged people in their fifties, who lived in Seoul, using the systematic random sampling method. The data were collected from November 3, 2003 to November 14, 2003 and the final subjects consisted of 498 respondents. Various statistical methods such as frequency, mean, cross tabulation, t-test, factor analysis, and multiple regression were used in this study. The results of this study were as follows. Firstly, most of the respondents preferred 55 to $70m^2$ sized individual units and they rarely wanted smaller units of less than $35m^2$. Individual units of one or two bedrooms were also preferred by future users. Small towns were preferred to large complex. For housing type, they preferred row houses or single detached houses to high-rise apartments. Secondly, there were no significant statistical differences between income and the preference of the physical features. From the results, we concluded that senior congregate housing should be developed not only in accordance with the users' preferences but also over a certain minimum physical quality level, regardless of the users' income.

Keywords

References

  1. 김유일(1988). 주거만족도에 관한 경험적 연구. 한양대학교대학원 박사학위논문
  2. 김태일(1995). 유료노인복지주거시설의 계획조건에 관한 연구-서울 거주 노인계층의 성향분석. 대한건축학회논문집, 11(10), 19-27
  3. 박근형, 양우현(1996). 노인을 위한 도시 공동주택의 계획방향에 관한 연구. 대한건축학회논문집, 12(1), 13-21
  4. 박희진, 양세화, 오찬옥(2003). 노인시설의 단위주거에 대한 요구분석. 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 36, 44-51
  5. 신광영(2003). 계급불평등과 도시공간-서울시 사례 연구. 서울시정개발연구원. 서울시 사회계층과 정책수요 (1-17). 서울: 서울시정개발연구원
  6. 오찬옥(1993). 중년층의 선호성향을 통해 본 노인주거모델. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  7. 유병선(2005). 노인공동생활주택 공급 및 관리모델 개발방향에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  8. 이인수(1997). 노인주거와 실버산업. 도서출판: 하우
  9. 이 현, 진미윤(1995). 특수수요계층의 주거선호에 대응하는 주택건설 및 공급방안. 대한주택공사 주택연구소
  10. 정희수, 권혁일(2004). 생애주기가 주택소비에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 주택연구, 12(1), 5-25
  11. 조은정(1994). 신세대소비자의 주거가치와 주거선호-신호 주거를 중심으로. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  12. 홍형옥(2001a). 노인공동생활주택에 대한 태도와 선호 -한국에서의 노인생활지원주택 개발 방향을 중심으로-. 한국가정관리학회지, 19(5), 147-166
  13. 홍형옥(2001b). 영국의 노인공동생활주택에 대한 검토. 한국가정관리학회지, 19(4), 49-68
  14. Arias, E. G. (1993). User group Preferences and Their Intensity: the Impacts of Residential Design. Arias, E. G(ed), The Meaning and Use of Housing: International Perspectives, Approaches and Their Applications(pp. 169-199). Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company
  15. Chavis, D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55-79 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922689
  16. Gans, H. (1968). People and Plans. N.Y.: Basic Books
  17. Hong, H. O., & You, B. S. (2003). Developing orientation of senior congregate housing in Korea-Focused on the opinion of middle aged group in their 50s. Architectural Research, Journal of the Architectural institute of Korea, 5(1), 49-59
  18. Kahn, A. J., & Kamerman, S. B. (1976). Social Services in International Perspectives. DHEW
  19. Lawton, M. P. (2001). The physical environment of the person with Alzheimer's disease. Aging & Mental Health, 5(Supplement 1), 56-64 https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860020020654
  20. McCarthy, C., & Saegert, S. (1978). Residential density, social overload, and social withdrawal. Human Ecology, 14, 6-23
  21. Moos & Lawton (1986). The physical environment of the person with Alzheimer's disease. Ageing & Mental Health, 5, 56-64
  22. Nasar, J. L., & Farokhpay, M. (1985). Assessment of activity priorities and design preferences of elderly residents in public housing: a case study. The Gerontologist, 25, 251-257 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/25.3.251
  23. Oldman (1990). Moving in Old Age: new directions in housing policies. London: HMSO
  24. Regnier, V. A. (1994). Assisted Living Housing for the Elderly: Design Innovations from the United States and Europe. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
  25. Reynolds, S. G., & beamish, J. O. (2003). Residential satisfaction of older adults in age-segregated facilities. Housing & Society, 30(1), 33-50 https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2003.11430481
  26. Robinson, J. W., Thompson, T., Emmons, P., & Graff, M. (1984). Towards an Architectural Definition of Normalization: Design Principles for Housing Severely and Profoundly Mentally Retarded Adults. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychoeducational Studies
  27. Sikorska, E. (1999). Organizational determinants of resident satisfaction with assisted living. Gerontologist, 39(4), 450-456 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/39.4.450
  28. Timko, C., & Moos, R. (1990). Determinants of interpersonal support and self-direction in group residential facilities. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 184-192 https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.5.S184
  29. Zaff, J., & Delvin, A. S. (1998). Sense of community in housing for the elderly. Journal of Community Psychology, 26(4), 381-398 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199807)26:4<381::AID-JCOP6>3.0.CO;2-W
  30. Zeisel, J. (2002). The story of housing for old people in north America. International Symposium, May 7, 2002 'Direction of Housing & Service Development in Aging Society', 54-59