Characteristics of the Inlet with the Pressure Perturbation in the Ramjet Engine

  • Shin, Dong-Shin (Department of Mechanical System Design Engineering, College of Engineering, Hongik University) ;
  • Kang, Ho-Chul (Department of Mechanical System Design Engineering, College of Engineering, Hongik University)
  • Published : 2006.02.01

Abstract

Flows in a ramjet inlet is simulated for the study of the rocket-ramjet transition. The flow is unsteady, two-dimensional axisymmetric, compressible and turbulent. Double time marching method is used for the unsteady calculation and HLLC method is used as a higher order MUSCL method. As for turbulent calculation, $\kappa-\omega$ SST model is used for more accurate viscous calculations. Sinusoidal pressure perturbation is given at the exit and the flow fields at the inlet is studied. The cruise condition as well as the ground test condition are considered. The pressure level for the ground test condition is relatively low and the effect of the pressure perturbation at the combustion chamber is small. The normal shock at the cruise condition is very sensitive to the pressure perturbation and can be easily detached from the cowl when the exit pressure is relatively high. The sudden decrease in the mass flux is observed when the inlet flow becomes subcritical, which can make the inlet incapable. The amplitude of travelling pressure waves becomes larger as the downstream pressure increases, and the wavelength becomes shorter as Mach number increases. The phase difference of the travelling perturbed pressure wave in space is 180 degree.

Keywords

References

  1. Dailey, C. L., 1955, 'Supersonic Diffuser Instability,' Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 733-749
  2. Kim, S. D., Kwon, C. O. and Song, D. J., 2004, 'Comparison of Turbulence Models in Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction,' KSME International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 153-166
  3. Lu, P. J. and Jain, L. T, 1998, 'Numerical Investigation of Inlet Buzz Flow,' Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 90-100 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5254
  4. Menter, F. R., 1994, 'Two-equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 1598-1605 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
  5. Newsome, R. W., 1984, 'Numerical simulation of Near-Critical and Unsteady, Subcritical Inlet Flow,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 1375-1379 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48577
  6. Roe, P. L., 1981, 'Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes,' J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 43, pp. 357-372 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5
  7. Shigematsu, J. and Yamamoto, K., 1990, 'A Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Inlet Using Implicit TVD Scheme,' AIAA Paper 90-2135
  8. Toro, E. F., 1997, 'Riemann Solves and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics,' Springer
  9. Wilcox, D. C., 1988, 'Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Model,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, No. 11, pp. 1299-1310 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10041