Root Barrier and Fertilizer Effects on Soil CO2 Efflux and Cotton Yield in a Pecan-Cotton Alley Cropping System in the Southern United States

  • Lee, Kye-Han (Department of Forestry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • An, Kiwan (Department of Forestry, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2006.01.11
  • Accepted : 2006.03.03
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

Little information is available on soil $CO_2$ efflux and crop yield under agroforestry systems. Soil $CO_2$ efflux, microbial biomass C, live fine root biomass, and cotton yield were measured under a pecan (Carya illinoinensis K. Koch)-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in southern USA. A belowground polyethylene root barrier was used to isolate tree roots from cotton which is to provide barrier and non-barrier treatments. The barrier and non-barrier treatment was randomly divided into three plots for conventional inorganic fertilizer application and the other three plots for organic poultry litter application. The rate of soil $CO_2$ efflux and the soil microbial biomass C were affected significantly (P < 0.05) by the fertilizer treatment while no significant effect of the barrier treatment was occurred. Cotton lint yield was significantly (P < 0.0 I) affected by the root barrier treatment while no effect was occurred by the fertilizer treatment with the yields being greatest ($521.2kg\;ha^{-1}$) in the root barrier ${\times}$ inorganic fertilizer treatment and lowest ($159.8kg\;ha^{-1}$) in the non-barrier ${\times}$ inorganic fertilizer treatment. The results suggest that the separation of tree-crop root systems with the application of inorganic fertilizer influence the soil moisture and soil N availability, which in tum will affect the magnitude of crop yield.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, S.C., Jose, S. Nair, P.K.R. Brecke, B.J. Nkedi-Kizza, P. and Ramsey, C.L. 2004. Safety-net role of tree roots: evidence from a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 192: 395-407 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.009
  2. Amatya, Goo, Chang, S.X., Beare, M.H. and Mead, D.J. 2002. Soil properties under a Pinus radiata - ryegrass silvopastoral system in New Zealand. Part II. C and N of soil microbial biomass, and soil N dynamics. Agroforestry Systems 54: 149-160 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015076607090
  3. Borken, W., Muhs, A. and Beese, F. 2002. Application of compost in spruce forests: effects on soil respiration, basal respiration and microbial biomass. Forest Ecology and Management 159: 49-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00709-5
  4. Buchmann, N. 2000. Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1625-1635 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00077-8
  5. Carlyle, J.C. and Than, U.B. 1988. Abiotic controls of soil respiration beneath an eighteen-year-old Pinus radiata stand in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Ecology 76: 654-662 https://doi.org/10.2307/2260565
  6. Oictor, M.C., Tessier, L. and Soulas, G. 1998. Reassessment of the $K_{EC}$ coefficient of the fumigation-extraction method in a soil profile. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 119-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00111-9
  7. Fahey, T.J. and Hughes, J.W. 1994. Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. Journal of Ecology 82: 533-548 https://doi.org/10.2307/2261262
  8. Fang, C., Moncrieff, J.B., Gholz, H.L. and Clark, K.L. 1998. Soil $CO_2$ efflux and its spatial variation in a Florida slash pine plantation. Plant Soil. 205: 135-146 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004304309827
  9. Garcia-Gil, J.C., Plaza, C., Soler-Rovira, P. and Polo, A. 2000. Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1907-1913 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00165-6
  10. Jose, S., Gillespie, R., Seifert, J.R., Mengel, D.B. and Pope, P.E. 2000. Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the Midwestern USA. 3. Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamics. Agroforestry Systems 48: 61-77 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006241406462
  11. Lee, K-H. and Jose, J. 2003. Soil respiration and microbial biomass in a pecan-cotton alley cropping system in Southern USA. Agroforestry Systems 58: 45-54 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025404019211
  12. Miller, A.W. and Pallardy, S.G. 2001. Resource competition across the crop-tree interface in a maixe-silver maple temperate alley cropping stand in Missouri. Agroforestry Systems 53: 247-259 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013327510748
  13. Raich, J.W. and Potter, C.S. 1995. Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Global Biogeochemistry Cycles 9: 23-36 https://doi.org/10.1029/94GB02723
  14. SAS. 1990. User's guide, version 6, 4th edition, Vols. 12. SAS institute, Inc. Cary, NC
  15. Schindler Wessells M.L., Bohlen, P.J., McCartney, D.A., Subler, S. and Edwards, C.A. 1997. Earthworm effects on soil respiration in com agroecosystems receiving different nutrient inputs. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29: 409-412 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00172-1
  16. Thevathasan, N.V. and Gordon, A.M. 1997. Poplar leaf biomass distribution and nitrogen dynamics in a poplar-barley intercropped system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems 37: 79-90 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005853811781
  17. Tufekcioglu, A., Raich, J.W., Isenhart, T.M. and Schultz, R.C. 2001. Soil respiration within riparian buffers and adjacent crop fields. Plant Soil 299: 117-124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9369-3
  18. Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C. and Jenkinson, D.S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19: 703-707 https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
  19. Wagai, R., Brye, K.R., Gower, S.T., Norman, J.M. and Bundy, L.G. 1998. Land use and environmental factors influencing soil surface $CO_2$ flux and microbial biomass in natural and managed ecosystems in southern Wisconsin. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 1501-1509 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00041-8
  20. Wanvestraut, R., Jose, S., Nair, P.K.R. and Brecke, B.J. 2004. Competition for water in a pecan-cotton alley cropping system. Agroforestry Systems 60: 167-179 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000013292.29487.7a