Evaluation of Post-Treatment Outcome of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Prognathism Patients

하악 전돌자의 하악지 시상분할 골절단술 후의 안정성에 대한 평가

  • Chung, Dong-Hwa (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 정동화 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2006.12.30

Abstract

Long term prediction of surgical result of skeletal class III has not been evaluated adequately because the stability of orthognathic surgery would be affected by not only set back amount of mandible but also many other factors like skeletal pattern, hyoid position, and airway size. The aimof this study is to discriminate the factors which affect the stability of post-treatment result of surgical outcome of sagittal split ramus osteotomy. We have collected 37 patients (male: 17, female: 20) from patients who have been treated at Orthodontic Department in Dankook University. The patients underwent 3 times Cephalometric X-ray taking at pre-, post-orthognathic surgery and after 12 months retention. The subjects were divided into 2 groups (Stable group: 21, Relapse group: 16) according to their relapse amount. We have taken following results from Students t-test and discriminant analysis. The discriminant factors which discern relapse and stable groupe among treatment change variables were BX and Ba-HY. Hyoid bone moved to posterior and inferior position due to surgery and repositioned superiorly and posteriorly during retention period. Skeletal patterns of the relapse group are smaller mandibular plane angle, anterior mandibular position, and greater distance from hyoid bone to cervical bone and mandible respectively.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 단국대학교

References

  1. Chung DH, Hatch JP, Dolce C, et al. Positional change of the hyoid bone after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid and wire fixation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:382-89 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112670
  2. Kawakami M, Yamamoto K, Fujimoto M, et al. Changes in tongue and hyoid positions, and posterior airway space following mandibular setback surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial surgery 2005;33:107-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2004.10.005
  3. Saitoh K. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway morphology after mandibular setback surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:556-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.017
  4. Kawamata A, Fujishita M, Arji Y, et al. Three-dimensional computed tom graphic evaluation of morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:278-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(00)70089-8
  5. Eggensperger N, Smolka W, Lizuka T. Long-term changes of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal airway size following mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005;33: 111-117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2004.10.004
  6. Ellis E III, Carlson DS. Stability two years after mandibular advancement with and without suprahyoid myotomy: an experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41:426-437 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90127-1
  7. Yang BH, Cha KS.A study on the perimandibular tissues before and after orthodontic treatment with orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathic patients. Korea J Orthod. 2000;30:261-72
  8. Son WS, Choi YS. Evaluation of hyoid bone position and airway size in Class III malocculsion . Korea J Orthod. 1996;26:247-254
  9. Hyo-Sang Park. A longitudinal positional changes of hyoid bone in Koreans with normal occlusion. Korean J. Orthod. 1996;26:677-689
  10. Woo KS, Yoon JH, Kim AC, et al. A study on the position of tongue and hyoid bone in realtion to vertical facial patterns in skeletal class III malocclusion. Korean J. Orthod. 2000;30:579-589
  11. Park WS, Lee JW, Cha KS. A study on the changes of pharyngeal airway, hyoid bone and head posture before and after tonsilectomy in funcitonal class III malocclusion patients. Korean J. Orthod. 1997;27:231-243
  12. Kim JR, Son WS. A comparative study on the degree of relapse following one jaw surgery and two jaw surgery in skeletal class III patients. Korean J. Orthod. 1995;25:613-625
  13. Chin KS, Kim JR, Son WS. Factors affecting postsurgical stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients. Korean J. Orthod. 1997;27:21-33
  14. Tselnik M, Pogrel MA. Assessment of the pharyngeal airway space after mandibular setback surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:282-285 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90053-3
  15. Gu GM, Nagata J, Suto M, et al: Hyoid position, pharyngeal airway and head posture in relation to relapse after the mandibular setback in skeletal class III. Clin Orthod Res 3: 67-77, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2000.030203.x
  16. RileyRW, Powell NB, Guilleminault C, et al: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome following surgery for mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45: 450-452, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90016-4
  17. Moon YM, Ahn SJ, Chang YI. Cephalometric Predictors of Long-term Stability in the Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2005;75:747-753
  18. Yoshida I, Yamaguchi N, Mizoguchi I. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances. Eur J Orthod 2006;28: 89-96 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji066
  19. Bailey LJ, Cevidances LHS, Proffit WR. Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126:273-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.003
  20. Lee JY, Yu HS, Ryu YK. A study on skeletal relapse patterns following orthognathic surgery of class III patients: comparison between SSRO and IVRO. Korean J. Orthod. 1998;28:461-477
  21. Eggensperger N, Smolka W, Rabal A, et al. Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1486-1496 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.007
  22. Yoshida K, Rivera GA, Matsuo N, et al. Long-term prognosis of BSSO mandibular relapse and its relation to different facial types. Angle Orthod 2000;70:220-226
  23. Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, et al. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle Class II patients: Different longterm skeletal responses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortbop 2001; 119:368-381 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.110983