DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

보건의료체계에 대한 전문가 인식 분석

Analysis of Experts' Views on Health Care: A Survey

  • Jung, Young-Ho (Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs) ;
  • Ko, Suk-Ja (Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs)
  • 발행 : 2006.12.30

초록

Either ways of understanding health care as a commodity or public work are at opposite ends of health care spectrum. These two rival conceptions reflected by viewpoint(ideology) would lead to different directions in policy-making for health care reform. The purpose of this study is to access the value differences of experts' policy views about health care issues by analyzing the extent of consensus among experts in the field of health care. Using primary data obtained through a mail survey of 558 experts in the field of health care, we analyzed the differences of experts' opinions about characteristics of health care market, policy issues and values Gdeology). The study represents from 50-50 split analysis, entropy index, and factor analysis that the wide spread disagreements over health policy, which is a major barriers to effective policy-making, could be caused by the ideological perception differences among experts. This implies that, if values play an important role in policy-making, we should identify the differences in value and seek ways to balance among the diverse values such as efficiency, equity, freedom, and security. For this, the policy issues debated on differences in values should be reconciled for narrowing gaps of experts' perceptions through various ways.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 최병호, 'OECD의 한국 보건의료체계 평가', 한국보건의료체계에 대한 OECD의 평가와 새 정부 보건의료정책 방향에 관한 토론회, 한국보건사회연구원, 2003
  2. Aiginger K, Mueller DC, Weiss C. Objectives, topics and methods in industrial organization during the nineties: Results from a survey. International Journal of Industrial Organization 1998;16:799-830 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00006-X
  3. Alston R, Kearl J. Vaughan M. Is there a global economic consensus?: Is there a consensus among economists in 1900's? The American Economic Review 1992;82(2):203-209
  4. Donabedian A. Social Responsibility for Personal Health Services: An Examination of Basic Values. Inquiry 1971; 8(2):3-19
  5. Feldman R, Morrisey M. Health Economics: A report on the field. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1990;15(3):627-646 https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-15-3-627
  6. Feldman R, Sloan F, Reply from Feldman and Sloan. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1989;14(3):621-625 https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-14-3-621
  7. Frey B, Pommerehne W, Schneider F, Gilbert G. Consensus and Dissension among Economists: An Empirical Inquiry. The American Economic Review, 1984;74(5):986-994
  8. Fuchs, V. Economics, values, and health care reform. The American Economic Review, 1996;86(1):1-24
  9. Jennings B, Hanson M. Commodity or Public Work- Two Perspectives on Health Care. Bioethics Forum 1995;Fall:3-11
  10. Saaty, T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980