DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Resistance Induction and Enhanced Tuber Production by Pre-inoculation with Bacterial Strains in Potato Plants against Phytophthora infestans

  • Kim, Hyo-Jeong (College of Applied Life Science, Faculty of Bioscience and Industry, the Research Institute for Subtropical Agriculture and Biotechnology, Cheju National University) ;
  • Jeun, Yong-Chull (College of Applied Life Science, Faculty of Bioscience and Industry, the Research Institute for Subtropical Agriculture and Biotechnology, Cheju National University)
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

Efficacy of resistance induction by the bacterial isolates Pseudomonas putida (TRL2-3), Micrococcus luteus (TRK2-2) and Flexibacteraceae bacterium (MRL412), which were isolated from the rhizosphere of plants growing in Jeju Mountain, were tested in a greenhouse. The disease severity caused by Phytophthora infestans was effectively reduced in the potato plants pre-inoculated with bacterial isolates compared with those of the untreated control plants growing in a greenhouse. In order to estimate the level of protection by the bacterial isolates, Mancozeb WP (Diesen $M^{(R)}$, Kyong nong) and DL-3-amino butyric acid (BABA) were pre-treated, whereas Dimethomorph WP ($Forum^{(R)}$, Kyong nong) and phosphonic acid ($H_{3}PO_{3}$) were post-treated the challenge inoculation with the pathogen. Disease severities of chemical pre-treated as well as post-treated plants were reduced compare to those of the untreated. The disease reduction in the plants pre-treated with Mancozeb WP was the highest, whereas that of post-treated with Dimethomorph WP was the lowest. The yields of plants pre-inoculated with three bacterial isolates were greatly increased than those of control plants. These results suggest that biological control by bacterial isolates might be an alternative strategy against late blight disease in potato plants growing in greenhouse.

Keywords

References

  1. Agrios, G. N. 2005. Control of plant diseases. Pp 293-353. In: Plant pathology, 5th edition. Academic Press
  2. Cohen, Y. 1994. 3-aminobutyric acid induces systemic resistance against Peronospore tabacina. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 44: 273-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-5765(05)80030-X
  3. Cohen, Y. R. 2002. $\beta$-Aminobutyric acid-induced resistance against plant pathogens. Plant Dise. 86: 448-457 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.5.448
  4. Erwin, D. C. and Ribeiro, O. K. 1996. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minn. pp. 562
  5. Fry, W. E. and Goodwin, S. B. 1995. Recent migrations of Phytophthora infestans. Pp 89-95. In: Phytophthora infestans 150. Dowley, L. J., Bannon, E., Cooke, L. R., Keane, T. and O'Sallivan, E. Eds. Boole Press, Dublin, Ireland
  6. Garno, T. and Ahn, S. B. 1991. Growth-promoting Azosporillum spp. isolated from the roots of several non-gramineous crops in Japan. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 37: 455-461 https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1991.10415058
  7. Grant, B. R., Dunstan, R. H., Griffith, J. M. Niere, J. O. and Smillie, R. H. 1990. The mechanism of phosphonic (phosphorous) acid action in Phytophthora. Australasian Plant Pathology 19: 115-121 https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9900115
  8. Guest, D. L., Pegg, K. G. and Whiley, A. W. 1995. Control of Phytothothora disease of tree crops using trunk-injected phosphonates. Horticultural Reviews 17: 299-330
  9. Jeun, Y. C. and Park, E. W. 2003. Ultrastructures of the leaves of cucumber plants treated with DL-3-aminobutyric acid at the vascular bundle and the penetration sites after inoculation with Colletotrichum orbiculare. Plant Pathol. J. 19: 85-91 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2003.19.2.085
  10. Jeun, Y. C. , Lee, Y. J. and Bae, Y. S. 2004a. Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance in cucumber plants against anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum orbiculare. Plant Pathol. J. 20: 172-176 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2004.20.3.172
  11. Jeun, Y. C. , Park, K. S., Kim, C. H., Fowler, W. D. and Kloepper, J. W. 2004b. Cytological observations of cucumber plants during induced resistance elicited by rhizobacteria. Biol. Control 29: 34-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00082-3
  12. Jones, J. B., Jones, J. P., Stall, R. E. and Zitter, T. A. 1991. Compendium of tomato diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minn. lOOpp
  13. Kloepper, J. W., Keong, J., Teintze, M. and Schroth, M. N. 1980. Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 286: 885-886 https://doi.org/10.1038/286885a0
  14. Lee, C. S., Kim, K. D., Hyun, J. W. and Jeun, Y. C. 2003. Isolation of rhizobacteria in Jeju Island showing anti-fungal effect against various plant pathogens. Microbiology 31: 251-254 https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2003.31.4.251
  15. Liu, L., Kloepper, J. W. and Tuzun, S. 1995. Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Duration of protection and effect of host resistance on protection and root colonization. Phytopathology 85: 1064-1068 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-85-1064
  16. Maurhofer, M., Hase, C., Meuwly, P., Mraux, J.-P. and Defago, G. 1994. Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO: influence of the gacA-gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology 84: 139-146 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-139
  17. Park, K. S. and Kloepper, J. W. 2000. Activation of PR-la promoter by rhizobacteria that induce systemic resistance in tobacco against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci. Biol. Control 18: 2-9 https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2000.0815
  18. Pieterse, C. M. J. and Van Loon, L. C. 1999. Salicylic acid-independent plant defence pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 4: 52-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01364-8
  19. Sticher, L., Mauch-Mani, B. and Metraux, J. P. 1997. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 35: 235-270 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.35.1.235
  20. Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M. and Pieterse, C. M. J. 1997. Mechanisms of PGPR-induced resistance against pathogens. Pp 50-57. In: Ogoshi, A., Kobayashi, Y., Homma, Y., Kodama, F., Kondo, N. and Akino, S. Eds. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria-Present status and future prospects. Sapporo: OECD
  21. Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M. and Pieterse, C. M. J. 1998a. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 36: 453-483 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453
  22. Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M. and Pieterse, C. M. J. 1998b. Induction and expression of PGPR-mediated induced resistance against pathogens. Pp 103-110. In: Duffy, B., Rosenberger, U. and Defago, G Eds. Molecular Approaches in Biological Control. Delemont: IOBC/ OILB
  23. Zimmerli, L., Jakab, G, Metraux, J. P. and Mauch-Mani, B. 2000. Potentiation of pathogen-specific defense mechanisms in Arabidopsis by $\beta$-aminobutyric acid. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 12920-12925

Cited by

  1. Biological control of post-harvest late blight of potatoes vol.17, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150701408881
  2. Ecofriendly control of potato late blight causative agent and the potential role of lactic acid bacteria: a review vol.96, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4282-y
  3. An rpoD gene sequence based evaluation of cultured Pseudomonas diversity on different growth media vol.159, pp.Pt_10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.068031-0
  4. Suppression of Citrus Canker by Pretreatment with Rhizobacterial Strains Showing Antibacterial Activity vol.20, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2014.20.2.101
  5. Growth and Late Blight Development vol.107, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-16-0247-R
  6. Antarctic Pseudomonas spp. promote wheat germination and growth at low temperatures vol.41, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2374-6