Visual Outcome after Surgical Removal of Craniopharyngiomas

  • Kim, Yeon-Seong (Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Jung, Shin (Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Cheon, Hyo-Cheol (Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Jung, Tae-Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kang, Sam-Suk (Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Soo-Han (Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
  • Published : 2006.03.30

Abstract

Objective : In the present study, we evaluate visual outcomes after surgical removal of craniopharyngiomas and analyze the factors that are considered to affect visual outcomes. Methods : This study includes 30 patients with craniopharyngioma, who underwent surgery in this clinic during the last 10 years. The changes of visual function [visual acuity and field] of the patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively, and paired data of this change were compared. Also, the factors that influence on this change were analysed. Results : Among the 21 patients complaining of decreased vision before the operation, 8 patients were improved [38.0%], and 7 patients were worse [33.3%]. However, Four out of 9 patients without any preoperative visual symptoms developed worse vision after the operation [44.4%]. The average duration of symptom was 17.2 months in the improved group and 23.6 months in the aggravated group. The tumors recurred in only 5 patients after the gross total resection : Four of them showed the aggravation of visual function after surgical removal and 1 had improvement. Conclusion : After removal of craniopharyngiomas, the overall rate of vision improvement, no change and aggravation are 26.6%, 36.7% and 36.7%, respectively. Aggravation of postoperative visual function is higher in males, children and patients with a longer duration of symptom and the tumor recurres more frequently in patients who complained of worsened vision after surgical removal.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamson TE, Wiestler OD, Kleihues, Yasargil MG : Correlation of clinical and pathological features in surgically treated craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 73 : 12-17, 1990 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0012
  2. Bang JS, Jung HW, Kim DG, Gwak HS, Paek SH, Chung YS, et al : Longterm Results of Surgical Treatment of Craniopharyngioma : Experience with 100 Adult Patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 30 : 472-478, 2001
  3. Baskin DS, Wilson CB : Surgical management of craniopharyngioma : A review of 74 cases. J Neurosurg 65 : 22-27, 1986 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1986.65.1.0022
  4. Bruce DA : Craniopharyngioma. In : Long DM, ed : Current Therapy in Neurological Surgery, 1985-1986. St Louis : CV Mosby Co : 36-38, 1985
  5. Carmel PW : Craniopharyngiomas, in Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS(eds) : Neurosurgery. New York : McGrow-Hill, 1996, pp1389-1400
  6. Chen C, Okera S, Davies PE, Selva D, Crompton JL : Craniopharyngioma : A review of long-term visual outcome. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 31 : 220-228, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00648.x
  7. Effenterre RV, Laure AB : Craniopharyngioma in adults and children : study of 122 surgical cases. J Neurosurg 97 : 3-11, 2002 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.97.1.0003
  8. Fisher PG, Jenab J, Goldthwaite PT, Tihan T, Wharam MD, Foer DR, et al : Outcome and failure patterns in childhood craniopharyngiomas. Childs Nerv Syst 14 : 558-563, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810050272
  9. Frazier CH, Alpers BJ : Adamantinoma of the craniopharyngeal duct. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 26 : 905-965, 1931 https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1931.02230110003001
  10. Harrington DO, Drake MV : Chiasm. In : Harrington DO, Drake MV, eds : The Visual Fields : A Textbook and Atlas of Clinical Perimetry, 6th Ed, St Louis : CV Mosby : 1990, pp273-303
  11. Hoffman HJ : Surgical management of craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Neurosurg 21(Suppl 1) : 44-49, 1994
  12. Hoffman HJ, DeSilva M, Humphreys RP, Drake JM, Smith ML, Blaser SI : Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg 76 : 47-52, 1992 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.76.1.0047
  13. John DM, Fredric MB, Duane IM, Edward LR, Cathy SD, Bernd SW : Long-term Outcomes for Surgically Resected Craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 46 : 291, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200002000-00007
  14. Konig A, Ludecke DK, Herrmann H-D : Transnasal surgery in the treatment of craniopharyngioma. Acta Neurochir (Suppl)(Wien) 83 : 1-7, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420500
  15. Miller NR, Calvert PC, Zinreich JS, Long DL : Quantitative analysis of visual results following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. Neuroophthalmol Jpn 3 : 431, 1986
  16. Pierre-Kahn A, Sainte-Rose C, Renier D : Surgical approach to children with craniopharyngiomas and severely impaired vision : Special considerations : Pediatr Neurosurg 21 : 50-56, 1994
  17. Poon A, McNeill P, Harper A, O'Day J : Pattern of visual loss associated with pituitary macroadenoma. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 23 : 107-116, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.1995.tb00138.x
  18. Repka MX, Miller NR, Miller M : Visual outcome after surgical removal of craniopharyngiomas. Ophthalmology 96 : 195-199, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32914-9
  19. Rosenberg L, Miller NR : Visual results after microsurgical removal of meningioma involving the anterior visual system. Arch Ophthalmol 102 : 1019-1023, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030821024
  20. Suharwardy J, Elston J : The clinical presentation of children with tumours affecting the anterior visual pathway. Eye 11 : 838-844, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.215
  21. Symon L, Sprich W : Radical excision of craniopharyngioma : Results in 20 patients. J Neurosurg 62 : 174-181, 1985 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.62.2.0174
  22. Taylor D. Chiasmal defects. In : Taylor D, ed. Pediatric Ophthalmology. Chicago : Mosby Yearbook 1990, pp488-497