Information Systems Review (경영정보학연구)

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

A Methodology of Identifying Ubiquitous Space Services for U-City Requirement Analysis

U-City 요구분석을 위한 유비쿼터스 공간 서비스 인식 방법론 개발

  • Kwon, Oh-Byung (School of International Management, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hoon (School of International Management, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Choi, Keun-Ho (School of International Management, Kyunghee University)
  • 권오병 (경희대학교 국제경영학부) ;
  • 김지훈 (경희대학교 국제경영학부) ;
  • 최근호 (경희대학교 국제경영학부)
  • Published : 2006.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, developing U-City as an integrated set of ubiquitous space services has been regarded as a promising field in realizing ubiquitous computing technology. However, well organized requirement analyses of U-City to declare what kinds of ubiquitous space services are needed and which ubiquitous computing technology should be incorporated to come up with the needs are still insufficient. Hence, the aims of this paper are to propose a set of unique U-City construction philosophies and to analyze which services should be offered in the ubiquitous space services in U-Cities. A field survey to the citizens who are potential end users of the ubiquitous space services was conducted to analyze the success factors of U-City using CSF methodology. Focused group interview with professionals in the field of ubiquitous computing technology in Korea was then performed to identify the relationship of the ubiquitous space services and the critical success factors.

최근에 유비쿼터스 공간 서비스의 통합된 집합으로서의 U-City 구축이 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 기술을 실현할 수 있는 유력한 분야로 부각되고 있다. 그러나 어떠한 종류의 유비쿼터스 공간 서비스들이 필요하며 또한 그러한 요구사항을 만족시키기 위해 어떤 종류의 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 기술을 활용하여 구현해야 하는지에 대한 조직화된 U-City 요구분석 방법이 존재하지 않는다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 요구분석 도출과 관계된 U-City만의 독특한 구축 철학과 이를 토대로 U-City내의 유비쿼터스 공간에 어떤 서비스가 존재해야 하는지에 대한 분석방법론을 제안하는 것이다. 이를 위해 U-City의 잠재 시민들을 대상으로 한 현장 조사를 통해 주요성공요인을 추출하였다. 또한 국내 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 기술분야의 전문가들을 대상으로 하여 표적집단면접법을 통해 유비쿼터스 공간 서비스와 주요성공요인간의 관계성을 분석하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alderfer, C.P., 'An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.4, 1969, pp. 142-175 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X
  2. Bruseberg, A. and D. McDonagh Philp, 'Focus Groups to Support the Industrial/Product Designer: a Review Based on Current Literature and Designers' Feedback', Applied Ergonomics, Vol.33, No.1, 2002, pp. 27-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00053-9
  3. CENIC, 'Can California Support a Ubiquitous Gigabyte Statewide Network by 2010-', Interact: A Networking Application Magazine, Vol. 4, Fall 2003
  4. Christensen, G.L. and J.C. Olson, 'Mapping Consumers' Mental Models with ZMET', Psychology & Marketing, Vol.19, No.6, 2002, pp. 477-502 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10021
  5. Collins, A.M. and E.F. Loftus, 'A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing', Psychological Review, Vol.82, No.6, 1975, pp. 407-428 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
  6. Coombs, C.H., A theory of data, New York: Wiley, 1964
  7. DMC, http://dmc.seoul.go.kr/english/index.jsp, 2005
  8. Green, P.E. and V. Srinivasan, 'Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook', Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.5, 1978, pp. 103-152 https://doi.org/10.1086/208721
  9. Herzberg, F., Work and the Nature of Man. Chapter 6, World Publishing, NY, 1966, pp. 71-91
  10. Krieger, B., R. Cappuccio, R. Katz, and H. Moskowitz, 'Next Generation Healthy Soup: An Exploration Using Conjoint Analysis', Journal of Sensory Studies, Vol.18, No.3, 2003, pp. 249-268 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2003.tb00388.x
  11. Leonard, D. and S. Sensiper, 'The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation', California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, 1988, pp. 112-132
  12. Maslow, A.H., 'A theory of Human Motivation', Psychological Review, Vol.50, 1943, pp. 370-396 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  13. Olson, E.L. and G. Bakke, 'Implementing the Lead User Method in a High Technology Firm: A Longitudinal Study of Intentions Versus Actions', Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.18, 2001, pp. 388-395 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00111-4
  14. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension. New York; Doubleday, 1966
  15. Sampson, P., 'Using the Repertory Grid Test', Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.11, February 1972, pp. 78-81
  16. Sheth, J.N., B. Mittal, and B.I. Newman, Customer Behaviour: Consumer Behaviour and Beyond, Orlando, Dryden Press, 1999
  17. Spectropolis, http://www.spectropolis.info/, 2005
  18. TagandScan, http://www.tagandscan.com/index.htm. 2005
  19. Ulwick, A.W., 'Turn Customer Input Into Innovation', Harvard Business Review, January 2002, pp. 92-97
  20. Urban, G.L. and J.R. Hauser, Design and Marketing of New Products, Prentice-Hall, 1993
  21. Urban, G.L., B.D. Weinberg, and J.R. Hauser, 'Premarket Forecasting of Really-New Products', Journal of Marketing, Vol.60, January 1996, pp. 47-60 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251887
  22. van Kleef, E., H. van Trijp and P. Luning, 'Consumer Research in the Early Stages of New Product Development: A Critical Review of Methods and Techniques', Food Quality and Preference, Vol.16, No.3, 2005, pp. 181-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.012
  23. Virtual Village, http://www.helsinkivirtualvillage.fi/, 2005
  24. Von Hippel, E. and R. Katz, 'Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits', Management Science, Vol.48, No.7, 2002, pp. 821-833 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817
  25. Von Hippel, E., 'Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts', Management Science, Vol. 32, No.7, 1986, pp. 791-805 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791