THE EFFECT OF LOCATION AND ANGLE OF DRILLING ON THE CHANGES OF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO BLOCK SPECIMENS DURING SCREWING ON MINIPLATE FIXATION

소형금속판에 고정나사의 삽입시 drilling의 위치 및 각도에 따른 시편의 이동량에 대한 효과

  • Oh, Hyun-Chul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • An, Jin-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Gu, Hong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 오현철 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 안진석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 구홍 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 국민석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 박홍주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소) ;
  • 오희균 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소)
  • Published : 2006.05.31

Abstract

Purpose This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of the location and angle of drilling on the changes of the distance between the two block specimens. Materials and methods In experimental group 1, the screw holes were prepared by drilling in the distal portion of compression part of the plate at $90^{\circ}$. In experimental group 2, the drilling was performed at an angle of $30^{\circ}$ proximal to the miniplate, and in experimental group 3, at $30^{\circ}$ distal respectively. In control group, the drilling was performed to the center of hole at $90^{\circ}$. The fixation screw length was 5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm in all groups. The results were as follows. Results 1. In control group, the mean changes between two specimens were 0.01 mm, 0.02 mm, and 0.00 mm in 5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm screws respectively. 2. In experimental group 1, the compression part was moved toward the retention part. The range of mean changes were from -0.39 mm to -0.43 mm. 3. In experimental group 2, the compression part was moved toward the retention part. The range of mean changes were from -0.51 mm to -0.56 mm. 4. In experimental group 3, the compression part was moved apart from the retention part and the range of mean changes were from 0.55 mm to 0.56 mm. 5. The changes were significantly different between all groups(p<0.01). Conclusion These results suggest that 0.4$\sim$0.5 mm of compressive effect can be achieved by drilling on the distal area of the screw hole at an angle of $90^{\circ}$ and by the proximal angulation to the miniplate, and the gap between specimens can be increased by distal angulation to the miniplate during drilling.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown JS, Grew N, Taylor G et al : Intermaxillary fixation compared to miniplate osteosynthesis in the management of the fractured mandible : an audit. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29 : 308, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(91)90116-M
  2. Renton TF, Wiesenfeld D : Mandibular fracture osteosynthesis ; a comparison of three techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34 : 166, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(96)90372-1
  3. Davies BW, Cederna JP, Guyuron B : Noncompression unicortical miniplate osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures. Ann Plast Surg 28 : 414, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199205000-00004
  4. Tuovinen V, Norholt SE, Jensen J : A retrospective analysis of 279 patients with isolated mandibular fractures treated with titanium miniplates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52 : 931, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80072-2
  5. Valentino J, Levy FE, Marentette LJ : Intraoral monocortical miniplating of mandible fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120 : 605, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1994.01880300021003
  6. Ikemura K, Kidaka H, Ettoh T et al : Osteosynthesis in facial bone fractures using miniplates : Clinical and Experimental studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46 : 10, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(88)90293-5
  7. Christiansen GW : Open reduction and tantalum plate insertion for fracture of the mandible. J Oral Surg 3 : 194, 1945
  8. Luhr HG : Zur stablilen Osteosynthese bei Unterkeiferfracturen. Dtsch Zahn arzt Z 23 : 754, 1968
  9. Michelet FX, Deymes J, Desus B : Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1 : 79, 1973
  10. Champy M, Wilk A, Schnebelen JM : Die Behandlung der Mandibular fracturen mmittels Osteosynthese ohne intramaxillare Ruhigstellung nach der Technik von Michelet FX, Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheik 63 : 339, 1975
  11. Champy M, Wilk A, Schnebelen JM : Treatment of mandibular fractures through osteosynthesis without intermaxillary fixation according to Michchelet's procedure. Dtsch Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilk 63 : 339, 1975
  12. Fonseca RJ : Oral and maxillofacial surgery 1st ed, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 2000
  13. Gutwald R, Alpert B, Schmelzeisen R : Principle and stability of locking plates. Keio J Med 52 : 21, 2003 https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.52.21
  14. Becker R : Stable compression fixation of mandibular fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 12 : 13, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-117X(74)90056-0
  15. Prein J : Manual of internal fixation in the cranio-facial skeleton. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 1998
  16. Huelk DF, Harger JH : Maxillofacial injuries : Their nature and mechanisms of production. J Oral Surg 27 : 451, 1969 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90070-X
  17. Brons R, Boering G : Fractures of the mandibular body treated by stable internal fixation. J Oral Surg 28 : 407, 1970
  18. Major G : Kirschner traction in treatment of maxillary fractures. J Am Med Assoc 110 : 1252, 1938 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1938.02790160010003
  19. Masser EJ, Hayes DE, Boyne PJ : Use of intraosseous metal appliances in fixation of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 25 : 493, 1967
  20. Kline SN : Lateral compression in the treatment of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 31 : 182, 1973
  21. Danis R : Principles and technique of festosteosynthesis. Massom and Cie, Paris 1949
  22. Shetty V, McBrearty D, Fourney M et al : Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system ; an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53 : 791, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90335-6