Experimental Study on Drag Reduction Effects of New Non-Ionic Surfactants

  • Tae, Choon-Sub (Building Energy Research Center, KIER) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Hwan (Department of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, JeonJu University)
  • Published : 2006.12.10

Abstract

The drag reduction (DR) and heat transfer efficiency reduction (ER) of non-ionic surfactant were investigated as a function of fluid velocity, temperature, and surfactant concentration. An experimental apparatus consisting of two temperature controlled water storage tanks, pumps, test specimen pipe and the piping network, two flow meters, two pressure gauges, a heat exchanger, and data logging system was built. From the experimental results, it was concluded that existing alkyl ammonium surfactant (CTAC Cethyl Trimethyl Ammonium Chloride) had DR of $0.6{\sim}0.8$ at $1,000{\sim}2,000ppm$ concentration with fluid temperature ranging between $50{\sim}60^{\circ}C$. However, the DR was very low when the fluid temperature was $70{\sim}80^{\circ}C$. The new amine oxide and betaine surfactant(SAOB Stearyl Amine Oxide + Betaine) had lower DR at fluid temperatures ranging between $50{\sim}60^{\circ}C$ compared with CTAC. However, with fluid temperature ranging between $70{\sim}80^{\circ}C$ the DR was $0.6{\sim}0.8$ when the concentration level was $1,000{\sim}2,000ppm$.

Keywords

References

  1. Sellin, R. H. S. and Moses, R. T., 1989, Drag reduction in fluid flows: Techniques for friction control, Ellis Horwood Limited Press, Chichester, England
  2. Zakin, J. L., Lu, B. and Bewersdorff, H. W., 1988, Surfactant drag reduction, Reviews in Chemical Engineering, Vol. 14, pp. 253-320
  3. Park, S. R, Moon, S. H., Lee, S. N. and Yoon, H. K, High efficiency thermal transportation technology for its application to district heating system, 1998, Proceedings of the SAREK 1998 Summer Annual Conference, pp. 941-945
  4. Yoon, S. M., Seo, T. B. and Kim, C. B., 1998, Characteristics of dragr reduction additives in the application of district heating system, Proceedings of the SAREK 1998 Summer Annual Conference, pp. 958-964
  5. Ohlendorf, D., Interthal, W. and Hoffman, H., 1986, Surfactant systems for drag reduction: Physico-chemical properties and rheological behaviour, Rheological Acta, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 25, pp. 468-486 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01774397
  6. Hu, Y. T., Boltenhagen, P., Matthys, E. F. and Pine, D.J., 1998, Shear thickening in low concentration solutions of wormlike micelles II: slip, fracture and stability of the shear induced phase, Journal of Rheology, Vol. 42, pp. 1209-1226 https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550917
  7. Gasljevic, K, Hoyer, K and Matthys, E. F., 1998, Micellar structure break-up and recovery in turbulent flow of a drag reducing surfactant solution, Progress and Trends in Rhelology, Springer-Verlag, pp.527-528
  8. Myska, J. and Chara, Z., 2003, Application of drag reducing surfactant in the heating circuit, Journal of Energy and Buildings, Vol. 35, pp. 813-819 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00243-8
  9. Hoechst, A. G. and Bruun & Soerensen Energitenik, A. S., 1996, Use of smooth water in a one-pipe, pulsating district heating system, EU-Thermie Contract No. EI 426 DK/DE, Internal Report, Heming Kommunale Vrker, DK
  10. Touhou Chemical Ind. Ltd., 2000, Research and Development of New Surfactants for High Density Thermal Energy Transportation, Internal Report, pp. 10.1-10.58