County-Based Vulnerability Evaluation to Agricultural Drought Using Principal Component Analysis - The case of Gyeonggi-do -

주성분 분석법을 이용한 시군단위별 농업가뭄에 대한 취약성 분석에 관한 연구 - 경기도를 중심으로 -

  • Jang, Min-Won (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 장민원 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Published : 2006.03.25

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to develop an evaluation method of regional vulnerability to agricultural drought and to classify the vulnerability patterns. In order to test the method, 24 city or county areas of Gyeonggi-do were chose. First, statistic data and digital maps referred for agricultural drought were defined, and the input data of 31 items were set up from 5 categories: land use factor, water resource factor, climate factor, topographic and soil factor, and agricultural production foundation factor. Second, for simplification of the factors, principal component analysis was carried out, and eventually 4 principal components which explain about 80.8% of total variance were extracted. Each of the principal components was explained into the vulnerability components of scale factor, geographical factor, weather factor and agricultural production foundation factor. Next, DVIP (Drought Vulnerability Index for Paddy), was calculated using factor scores from principal components. Last, by means of statistical cluster analysis on the DVIP, the study area was classified as 5 patterns from A to E. The cluster A corresponds to the area where the agricultural industry is insignificant and the agricultural foundation is little equipped, and the cluster B includes typical agricultural areas where the cultivation areas are large but irrigation facilities are still insufficient. As for the cluster C, the corresponding areas are vulnerable to the climate change, and the D cluster applies to the area with extensive forests and high elevation farmlands. The last cluster I indicates the areas where the farmlands are small but most of them are irrigated as much.

Keywords

References

  1. 농림수산부, 1983, '81'82 한해극복지
  2. 농림수산부, 1995, '94-'95 가뭄극복
  3. 농업기반공사, 2003, 농업생산기반정비사업통계연보, 농림부
  4. 농수산부, 1978, 旱害克服誌
  5. Bender, S., 2002, Development and Use of Natural Hazard Vulnerability-Assessment Techniques in the Americas, Natural Hazards Review 3(4) : 136-138 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2002)3:4(136)
  6. Downing, T. T. and Bakker, K., 2000, Drought discourse and Vulnerability, drought: A Global Assessment, Natural Hazards and Disasters Series, Routledge publishers
  7. Flax, Lisa K., Russel W. Jackson, and David N. Stein, 2002, Community Vulnerability Assessment Tool Methodology, Natural Hazards Review 3(4) : 163 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2002)3:4(163)
  8. Ghosh, J., 2002, Water Policy For Drought Proofing Chhattisgraph, Institute For Human Development, sponsored by the Planning Commission, India
  9. Granger, K., Jones, T., Leiba, M., and Scott, G., 1999, Community Risk in Cairns: A Provisional Multi Hazard Risk Assessment, Australian Geological Survey Organization, Australia
  10. IPCC, 2001, IPCC Third Assessment Report(TAR), 995
  11. Kelly, P. M. and Adger, W. N., 2000, Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change and Facilitation Adaption, Climatic Change 47 : 325-352 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005627828199
  12. Mileti, D., 2000, Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry Press
  13. Odeh, David J., 2002, Natural Hazards Vulnerability Assessment for Stationwide Mitigation Planning in Rhode Island, Natural Hazards Review 3(4) : 177-187 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2002)3:4(177)
  14. Wilhelmi, O. V. and Wilhite, D. A., 2002, Assessing Vulnerability to Agricultural Drought: A Nebraska Case Study, Natural Hazards 25 : 37-58 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013388814894