Correction of CIEDE2000 Color Difference Formula for the Analysis of Low Chroma and Low Lightness Colors

  • Woo Hwa-Lyung (School of Textiles, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Sam-Soo (School of Textiles, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Hudson Samuel M. (Textile Engineering, Chemistry & Science Department, NC State University)
  • Published : 2006.10.27

Abstract

There are many discrepancies between visually perceived color-difference and that which is quantified from an instrumental measurement when dark color samples are measured in the textile industry. The samples were prepared to represent these dark shades and the values of the instrumental results from conventional color-difference formulae(CIELAB, CMC, BFD II, CIE94, LCD99 and CIEDE2000). Those of visual assessment were compared. The experimental results show that the CIELAB formula gives the best performance over other formulae, and the CIEDE2000 formula for the color-difference according to chroma presents the worst performance. Therefore, we can say that the problems in color matching of dark shades are caused by imperfect formula, because the results obtained from a color-difference formulae are different and the CMC which is used as a standard color-difference formula in the textile industry is not correct. So, a revised color-difference formula is proposed in this study, to account for these problems.

Keywords

References

  1. F. W. Billmeyer and M. Saltzman, 'Principles of Color Technology 2nd ed.', Wiley, pp. 107-130, 1981
  2. S. M. Cho, S. C. Choi and T. Wakida, Effect of Sputter Etching on Color Change of Polyamide Fabrics Dyed with Natural Dyes, J. Korean Fiber Soc., 35(4), 222-226(1998)
  3. M. R. Luo, G. Cui and B. Rigg, The Development of the CIEm 2000 Colour-difference Formula: OEDE2000, Col. Res. Appl, 26(5), 340-350(2001) https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049
  4. M. R. Luo and B. Rigg, Chromaticity discrimination Ellipses for Surface Colours, Col. Res. Appl., 11(1), 25-42(1986) https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080110107
  5. W. G. Kuo and M. R. Luo, Methods for Quantifying Metamerism. Part1- Visual Assessment, J. Soc. Dyers Col., 112(11), 312-320(1996)
  6. W. G. Kuo and M. R. Luo, Methods for Quantifying Metamerism. Part2-Instrumental Methods, J. Soc. Dyers Col., 112(12), 354-360(1996)
  7. S. S. Guan and M. R. Luo, Investigation of Parametric Effects Using Small Colour Differences, Col. Res. Appl., 24(5), 331-343(1999) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199910)24:5<331::AID-COL5>3.0.CO;2-9
  8. S. S. Guan and M. R. Luo, Investigation of Parametric Effects Using Large Colour Differences, Col. Res. Appl., 24(5), 356-368(1999) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199910)24:5<356::AID-COL7>3.0.CO;2-N
  9. S. D. Kim and E. J. Park, Relation between Chemical Structure of Yellow Disperse Dyes and Their Lightfastness, Fibers and Polymers, 2(3), 159-163(2001) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02875330
  10. H. S. Yoon and H. W. Chung, Effects of Fluorescent Whitening Agents in Detergent on the Shade of Cotton Fabrics(2) -Color Changes of Dyed Cotton Fabrics-, J. Korean Fiber Soc., 35(7), 370-374(1998)
  11. J. J. Lee, N. K. Han, W. J. Lee, J. H. Choi and J. P. Kim, Synthesis of Temporarily Solubilized Reactive Disperse Dyes and Their Application to the Polyester/Cotton Blend Fabric, Fibers and Polymers, 3(3), 85-90(2002) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02892622
  12. M. R. Luo and B. Rigg, A Colour-difference Formula for Surface Colours under Illuminant A, J. Soc. Dyers Col., 103(2), 86-94(1987)
  13. C. Alder, K. P. Chaing, T. F. Chong, E. Coates, A. A. Khalili and B. Rigg, Uniform Chromaticity Scales - New Experimental Data, J. Soc. Dyers Col., 98(1), 14-20(1982)
  14. D. H. Kim, The Influence of Parametric Effects on the Appearance of Small Colour Differences, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Leeds, 1997