DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fauna of Macroinvertebrates and Composition of Functional Feeding Groups about the Aquatic Insects to Microhabitats from the Geum River, Korea

  • Published : 2006.10.31

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to find out the fauna of macroinvertebrate and composition of functional feeding groups about the aquatic insects to microhabitat from the Geum River, Korea. This study is based on investigations of the main channel of Geum River, Korea which is upstream of Daecheong Dam, and carried out in the spring and autumn of 2004. Collections from all the sites were 39,532 individuals, 130 species, 54 families, 16 orders, 7 classes, and 4 phyla of macroinvertebrates. Aquatic insects were composed of 90.76% (118 species) and 98.88% (39,088 individuals) of all the identified species. Among the microhabitats, the riffles were collected 26,293 individuals and 92 species, and the runs were collected 12,329 individuals and 89 species. Finally, the pools were collected 494 individuals and 41 species. In this survey, the proportions of functional feeding groups of aquatic insects were as follows (percent of identified): predators 37.65%, gathering-collectors 23.53%, scrapers 16.47%, filtering-collectors 11.76%, shredders 9.41% and plant-piercers 1.18%. Also, the functional feeding groups were sorted according to microhabitat, in the riffles 30.65% were predators and 29.03% were gathering-collectors; in the run 30.3% were predators, and 28.79% were gathering-collectors; while in the pools 36.67% were predators, and 30.0% were gathering-collectors. In all microhabitats, gathering collectors and predators were predominant, because most of the survey sites are in the midstream. Also, the scrapers were shown more frequently in the riffle (17.74%) and run (18.18 %) than pool (13.13%), the filtering-collectors were shown more frequently in the riffle (14.52%) and the run (12.12%) than the pool (6.67%), and the plant-piercers (3.33%) were found only in pools. But the shredders weren't a difference in the run (10.61%), the pool (10.0%) and the riffle (8.06%), because of the characteristic. Microhabitats (riffle and run) are much alike in composition ratio of functional feeding groups and pool was very lower out of composition ratio in microhabitats. But riffle is very important than run, because most of individual occur in streams. Besides, pool was diverse to composition ratios, considering the number of individuals.

Keywords

References

  1. Allan JD. 1995. Stream Ecology (Structure and Function of Running Waters). Chapman & Hall, London
  2. Bae YJ, Won DH, Hoang DH, Jin YH, Hwang JM. 2003. Community composition and functional feeding groups of aquatic inscts according to stream order from the gapyeong creek in Gyeonggi-do, Korea. Korean J Limnol 36: 21-28
  3. Cummins KW, Klug MJ. 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10: 147-172 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001051
  4. Hilsenhoff WL. 1977. Use of arthropods to evaluate water quality of streams. Tech. Bull. No. 100, Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A
  5. Hwang SO, Chang YD. 1992a. Studies on the Effects of Environmental factors to Aquatic Insects in the upper stream of Kum River. Korean J Limnol 25: 235-242
  6. Hwang SO, Chang YD. 1992b. Studies on the Aquatic Insect Community in the upper stream of Kum River. Korean J Limnol 25: 243- 252
  7. Hynes HBN. 1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
  8. Kim HS. 1973. Illustrated Encyclopedia Fauna & Flora of Korea. Vol. 14 Anomura.Brachyura. Ministry of Education, Seoul. (in Korean)
  9. Kim HS. 1977. Illustrated Encyclopedia Fauna & Flora of Korea. Vol. 19 Macrura. Ministry of Education, Seoul. (in Korean)
  10. Kwon OK, Park GM, Lee JS. 1993. Coloured Shells of Korea. Academybook, Seoul. (in Korean)
  11. Lee CE. 1971. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Heteroptera of Korea. Samhwasa, Seoul pp 103-1059. (in Korean)
  12. Merritt RW, Cummins KW. 1984. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 2nd. Ed. Kendall/Hunt Publ. Co., Dubuque, Iowa
  13. Merritt RW, Cummins KW. 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects or North America. 3rd. ed. Kendall/Hunt Publ. Co., Dubuque, Iowa
  14. Quinn JM, Hickey CW. 1990. Characterisation and classification of bentic invertebrate communities in 88 New Zealand rivers in relation to environmental factors. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 24: 387-409 https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1990.9516432
  15. Ro TH, Chun DJ. 2004. Functional Feeding Group Categorization of Korean Immature Aquatic Insects and Community Stability Analysis. Korean J Limnol 37: 137-148
  16. Ro TH. 2002. Categorization and Ecological Importance of Functional Feeding Groups as Essential Units in Lotic Ecosystems. Bulletin of the KACN ser 21: 68-93
  17. Song KR. 1995. Systematics of the Hirudinea (Annelida) in Korea. Korea Univ. Seoul. (in Korean)
  18. The Entomological Society of Korea and Koeran Society of Applied Entomology, 1994. Check list of Insects from Korea. Konkuk Univ. Press. Seoul. (in Korean)
  19. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. 'The river continuum concept.' Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37: 130-137 https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017
  20. Ward JV. 1992. Aquatic insect ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York
  21. Willams DD, Feltmate BW. 1992. Aquatic Insects. C.A.B International. Wallingford, UK
  22. Yoon IB. 1988. Illustrated Encyclopedia Fauna & Flora of Korea Vol. 30 Aquatic Insects. Ministry of Education, Seoul. (in Korean)
  23. Yoon IB. 1995. Aquatic insects of Korea. Jeonghangsa, Seoul. (in Korean)