DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatial Pattern Analysis of High Resolution Satellite Imagery: Level Index Approach using Variogram

  • Yoo, Hee-Young (Dept. of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Won (Dept. of Information System Engineering, Hansung University) ;
  • Kwon, Byung-Doo (Dept. of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2006.10.31

Abstract

A traditional image analysis or classification method using satellite imagery is mostly based on the spectral information. However, the spatial information is more important according as the resolution is higher and spatial patterns are more complex. In this study, we attempted to compare and analyze the variogram properties of actual high resolution imageries mainly in the urban area. Through the several experiments, we have understood that the variogram is various according to a sensor type, spatial resolution, a location, a feature type, time, season and so on and shows the information related to a feature size. With simple modeling, we confirmed that the unique variogram types were shown unlike the classical variogram in case of small subsets. Based on the grasped variogram characteristics, we made a level index map for determining urban complexity or land-use classification. These results will become more and more important and be widely applied to the various fields of high-resolution imagery such as KOMPSAT-2 and KOMPSAT-3 which is scheduled to be launched.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkinson, P. M. and F. M. Danson, 1988. Spatial resolution for remote sensing of forest plantations, Proceedings of IGARSS '88 Symposium, Edinburgh, Scotland, 13-16 September, pp. 221-223
  2. Benoit, A. S. and F. Cavayas, 1997. Automated Forest Structure Mapping from High Resolution Imagery Based on Directional Semivariogram Estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 61: 82-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00242-8
  3. Curran, P. J., 1988. The semi-variogram in remote sensing: an introduction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24(3): 493-507 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90021-1
  4. Davis, L. S., 1981. Polarograms: a new tool for image texture analysis. Pattern Recognition, 13: 219-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(81)90098-4
  5. Dungan, J., 1998. Spatial prediction of vegetation quantities using ground and image data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(2): 267-285 https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698216242
  6. Li, P. and Z. Li, 2001. An evaluation of geostatistical texture for remote sensing data classification. Proceedings of International Symposium on Remote Sensing, Jeju, Korea, 587-592
  7. Ramstein, G. and M. Raffy, 1989. Analysis of the structure of radiometric remotely-sensed images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6): 1049-1073 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903944
  8. Colombo, S., M. Chica-Olmo, F. Abarca, and H. Eva, 2004. Variographic analysis of tropical forest cover from multi-scale remotely sensed imagery. Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 58: 330-341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2004.03.004
  9. Wu, S., B. Xu, and L. Wang, 2006. Urban Land-use Classification Using Variogram-based Analysis with an Aerial Photograph. Photogrammetry Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(7): 813-822 https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.72.7.813
  10. Woodcock, C. E., A. H. Strahler, and D. L. B. Jupp, 1998a. The use of variograms in remote sensing I: Scene models and simulated images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3): 323-348 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90108-3
  11. Woodcock, C. E., A. H. Strahler, and D. L. B. Jupp, 1998b, The use of variograms in remote sensing II: real digital images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3): 349-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90109-5