한국대기환경학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment)

  • 제22권5호
  • /
  • Pages.590-603
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1598-7132(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5346(eISSN)
한국대기환경학회 (Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment)
권호 표지

PMF 분석을 이용한 ACE-Asia 측정기간 중 제주 고산지역 입자상 물질의 입경별 발생원 추정

Size-resolved Source Apportionment of Ambient Particles by Positive Matrix Factorization at Gosan, Jeju Island during ACE-Asia

  • 문광주 (국립환경연구원 환경진단연구부 대기환경과) ;
  • 한진석 (국립환경연구원 환경진단연구부 대기환경과) ;
  • 공부주 (국립환경연구원 환경진단연구부 대기환경과) ;
  • 정일록 (국립환경연구원 환경진단연구부 대기환경과) ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • Moon K.J. (Department of Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Han, J.S. (Department of Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kong, B.J. (Department of Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Jung, I.R. (Department of Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Cliff Steven S. (The DELTA Group, University of California Davis) ;
  • Cahill Thomas A. (The DELTA Group, University of California Davis) ;
  • Perry Kelvin D. (Meteorology Department, University of Utah)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Size-and time-resolved aerosol samples were collected using an eight-stage Davis rotating unit for monitoring (DRUM) sampler from 23 March to 29 April 2001 at Gosan, Jeju Island, Korea, which is one of the super sites of Asia-Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment(ACE-Asia). These samples were analyzed using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence for 3-hr average concentrations of 19 elements including Al, Si, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Br, Rb, and Pb. The size-resolved data sets were then analyzed using the positive matrix factorization(PMF) technique to identify possible sources and estimate their contributions to particulate matter mass. PMF analysis uses the uncertainty of the measured data to provide an optimal weighting. Twelve sources were resolved in eight size ranges($0.09{\sim}12{\mu}m$) and included continental soil, local soil, sea salt, biomass/biofuel burning, coal combustion, oil combustion, municipal incineration, nonferrous metal source, ferrous metal source, gasoline vehicle, diesel vehicle, and volcanic emission. The PMF result of size-resolved source contributions showed that natural sources represented by local soil, sea salt, continental soil, and volcanic emission contributed about 79% to the predicted primary particulate matter(PM) mass in the coarse size range ($1.15{\sim}12{\mu}m$) while anthropogenic sources such as coal combustion and biomass/biofuel burning contributed about 58% in the fine size range($0.56{\sim}2.5{\mu}m$). The diesel vehicle source contributed mostly in ultra-fine size range($0.09{\sim}0.56{\mu}m$) and was responsible for about 56% of the primary PM mass.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bates, T.S., B.J. Huebert, J.L. Gras, B. Griffiths, and P.A. Durkee (1998) The international global atmospheric chemistry (IGAC) project's first aerosol characterization experiment (ACE 1)-Overview, Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 16297-16318 https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03741
  2. Begun, B.A., E. Kim, S.K. Biswas, and P.K. Hopke (2004) Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and semi-urban areas in Bangladesh, Atmospheric Environment, 38, 3025-3038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.042
  3. Bench, G., P.G. Grant, D. Ueda, S.S. Cliff, K.D. Perry, and T.A. Cahill (2002) The use of STIM and PESA to respectively measure profiles of aerosol mass and hydrogen content across mylar rotating drug impactor samples, Aerosol Science and Technology, 36, 642-651 https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820252883874
  4. Cahill, T.A., C. Goodart, J.W. Nelson, R.A. Eldred, J.S. Nasstrom, and P.J. Feeny (1985) Design and evaluation of the DRUM impactor, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Particulate and Multi-Phase Processes (vol. 2), edited by: Ariman, T. and Nejat, T., Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, Pa., pp. 319-325
  5. Cahill, T.A. and P. Wakabayashi (1993) Compositional analysis of size-segregated erosol samples, in Measurement Challenges in Atmospheric Chemistry, American Chemical Society Advances in Chemistry Series No. 232, L. Newman, Ed., pp. 211-228
  6. Carrico, C.M., P. Kus, M.J. Rood, P.K. Quinn, and T.S. Bates (2003) Mixtures of pollution, dust, sea salt, and volcanic aerosol during ACE-Asia: Radiative properties as a function of relative humidity, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (D23), 8650, doi:10.1029/2003JD003405
  7. Cao, L., W. Tian, B. Ni, Y. Zhang, and P. Wang (2002) Preliminary study of airborne particulate matter in a Beijing sampling station by instrumental neutron activation analysis, Atmospheric Environment, 36, 1951-1956 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00178-4
  8. Cheng, Z.L., K.S. Lam, L.Y. Chan, T. Wang, and K.K. Cheng (2000) Chemical characteristics of aerosols at coastal station in Hong Kong-I. Seasonal variation of major ions, halogens and mineral dusts between 1995 and 1996, Atmospheric Environment, 34, 2771-2783 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00343-X
  9. Chueinta, W., P.K. Hopke, and P. Paatero (2000) Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and suburban residential area in Thailand by positive matrix factorization, Atmospheric Environment, 34, 3319-3329 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00433-1
  10. Davis, B.L., L.R. Johnson, D.T. Griffen, W.R. Phillips, R.K. Stevens, and D. Maughan (1981) Quantitative Analysis of Mt. St. Helens Ash by X-Ray Diffraction and X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 20, 922-933 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<0922:QAOMSH>2.0.CO;2
  11. Draxler, R. and G.D. Hess (2004) Description of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system, NOAA Technical MEmorandum ERL ARL-224, 28pp., Air Resources Lab., Silber Spring, Meryland
  12. Han, J.S., K.J. Moon, J.Y. Ahn, Y.D. Hong, Y.J. Kim, S.Y. Ryu, S.S. Cliff, T.A. Cahill (2004) Characteristics of ion components and trace elements of fine particles at Gosan, Korea in spring time from 2001 to 2003, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 92, 73-93 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000014510.21563.50
  13. Han, J.S., K.J. Moon, S.J. Lee, J.E. Kim, and Y.J. Kim (2005) Size distribution characteristics of particulate mass and ion components at Gosan, Korea from 2002 to 2003, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 21(E1), 23-35
  14. Han, J.S., K.J. Moon, S.J. Lee, Y.J. Kim, S.Y. Ryu, S.S. Cliff, S.M. Yi (2006) Size-resolved source apportionment of ambient particles by positive matrix factorization at Gosan background site in East Asia, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 211-223 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-211-2006
  15. He, K., F. Yang, Y. Ma, Q. Zhang, X. Yao, C.K. Chan, S. Cadle, T. Chan, and P. Mulawa (2001) The characteristics of $PM_{2.5}$ in Beijing, China, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 4959-4970 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00301-6
  16. Hien, P.D., V.T. Bac, and N.T.H. Thinh (2004) PMF receptor modeling of fine and coarse $PM_{10}$ in air masses governing monsoon conditions in Hanoi, northern Vietnam, Atmospheric Environment, 38, 189-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.09.064
  17. Huebert, B.J., T. Bates, P.B. Russel, G. Shi, Y.J. Kim, K. Kawamura, G. Carmichael, and T. Nakajima (2003) An overview of ACE-Asia: Strategies for quantifying the relationships between Asian aerosols and their climatic impacts, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (D23), 8633, doi:10.1029/2003JD003550
  18. Kang, C.M. (2002) Characteristics of the Fine Particles and Source Apportionments using the CMB model in Seoul Area, Doctoral dissertation, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
  19. Kim, E., T.V. Larson, P.K. Hopke, C. Slaughter, L.E. Sheppard, and C. Claiborn (2003) Source identification of $PM_{2.5}$ in an arid Northwest U.S. City by positive matrix factorization, Atmospheric Research, 66, 291-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00025-5
  20. Lee, E., C.K. Chan, and P. Paatero (1999) Application of positive matrix factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong, Atmospheric Environment, 33, 3201-3212 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00113-2
  21. Mamuro, T.A. and T.K. Mizohata (1979a) Elemental Compositions of Suspended Particles Released from Various Boilers, Annual Report of the Radiation Center of Osaka Prefecture, 20, 917
  22. Mamuro, T.A. and T.K. Mizohata (1979b) Elemental Compositions of Suspended Particles Released from Iron and Steel Works, Annual Report of the Radiation Center of Osaka Prefecture, 20, 1928
  23. Paatero, P. (1996) User's Guide for Positive Matrix Factorization Programs PMF2.EXE and PMF3.EXE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
  24. Paatero, P. (2000) User's Guide for Positive Matrix Factorization programs PMF2 and PMF3, Part 1: tutorial
  25. Paatero, P., P.K. Hopke, X.H. Song, and Z. Ramadan (2002) Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic models, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 60, 253-264 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00200-3
  26. Paatero, P. and U. Tapper (1993) Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit problem, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 18, 183-194 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(93)80055-M
  27. Paatero, P. and U. Tapper (1994) Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values, Environmetrics, 5, 111-26 https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203
  28. Perry, K.D., T.A. Cahill, R.C. Schnell, and J.M. Harries (1999) Long-range transport of anthropogenic aerosols to the national Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration baseline station at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 18521-18533 https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100083
  29. Raes, F., T. Bates, F. McGovern, and M.V. Liedekerke (2000) The 2nd Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-2): General overview and main results, Tellus, 52B, 111-125
  30. Small, M., M.S. Germani, W.H. Zoller, and J.L. Moyers (1981) Fractionation of Elements During Copper Smelting, Environmental Science and Technology., 15, 299-304 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00085a005
  31. Song, X.H., A.V. Pollissar, and P.K. Hopke (2001) Sources of fine particle composition in the northeastern US, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 5277-5286 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00338-7
  32. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1987) Protocol for applying and validating the CMB model, EPA-450/4-87-010
  33. Watson, J.G. (1979) Chemical Element Balance Recetor Model Methodology for Assessing the Source of Fine and Total Suspended Particulate Matter in Portland, Oregon, PhD Thesis, Oregon Graduate Center, Beaverton
  34. Watson, J.G., J.C. Chow, Z. Lu, E.M. Fujita, D.H. Lowenthal, D.R. Lawson, and L.L. Ashbaugh (1994) Chemical Mass Balance source apportionment of $PM_{10}$ during the Southern California Air Quality Study, Aerosol Science and Technology, 21, 136