한국지반공학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society)

  • 제22권11호
  • /
  • Pages.151-158
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1229-2427(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-646X(eISSN)
한국지반공학회 (Korean Geotechnical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

응력에 의한 밀도증가의 영향과 액상화 원심모형실험을 위한 모형지반성형법

The Influence of Stress-induced Densification and Centrifuge Model Preparation Method for Soil Liquefaction

  • 발행 : 2006.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

균일한 모래지반을 이용한 원심모형실험에서는 지표면근처에서 액상화가 발생한 후에 점차적으로 깊은 곳으로 전파되는 경향을 보였다. 이와 같은 현상은 실내실험에서 상재하중효과를 고려했을 때 관찰되는 액상화현상과 상반되는 것처럼 보인다. 그러나, 응력증가에 따른 모형지반의 상대밀도증가가 구속압증가에 따른 액상화저항감소를 상쇄시킨다. 이와 같은 응력증가에 따른 상대밀도증가는 실제 원심모형실험에서 발생하고 있으나, 모형지반성형법에서는 고려되고 있지 않다. 따라서, 본 논문에서는 원심모형실험에서 발생할 수 있는 상대밀도증가를 고려한 새로운 원심모형지반성형법을 제안하였다. 새로운 모형지반성형법은 액상화에 관한 $K_0$ 효과를 연구하는데 사용될 수 있으며, 본 연구에서는 수치해석방법을 이용하여 그 실용성을 증명하였다.

Centrifuge tests have shown that a uniformly placed sand layer will first initiate liquefaction near the surface and that liquefaction will progress downward during shaking. This appears to be in conflict with the overburden stress effect on soil liquefaction (i.e., $K_0$ effect) observed in laboratory testing. This discrepancy can be explained by stress-induced densification at depth which overcomes the effect of confining stress on liquefaction resistance. Stress densification occurs in centrifuge model tests but its effect has generally not been considered when preparing or evaluating centrifuge models. A new centrifuge model preparation method is proposed by considering stress-induced densification upon spin-up. The proposed method can be used to explore $K_0$ effects. The method is supported in this study by numerical predictions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arulanandan, K, Anandarajah, A and Abghari, A. (1982), 'Centrifuge modelling of soil liquefaction susceptibility', Physical modeling of soil dynamics problems, preprint 82-063, American Society of Civil Engineers, Las Vegas, NY, April 26-30
  2. Arulanandan, K. and Scott, R.F. (1993), 'Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems', Proceedings of the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, Vols. 1 and 2, Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  3. Bellotti, R., Ghionna, V. N. and Morabito, P. (1991), 'Uniformity tests in calibration chamber samples by the thermal probe method', Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.14, No.2, pp.195-205 https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10561J
  4. Byrne, P.M., Beaty, M., and Park, S.-S. (2001), 'Analyses of ERDC centrifuge tests using UBCSAND', Report to Engineer Research Development Center, Dec. 2001
  5. Byrne, P.M., Park, S.-S., Beaty, M., Sharp, M., Gonzalez, L. and Abdoun, T. (2004), 'Numerical modeling of liquefaction and comparison with centrifuge tests', Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.41, No.2, pp.193-211 https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-088
  6. Florin, V. A. and Ivanov, P. L. (1961), 'Liquefaction of saturated sandy soils', Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.1, pp.107-111
  7. Gonzalez, L, Abdoun, T., and Sharp, M.K. (2002), 'Modeling of seismically induced liquefaction under high confining stress', International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Vol.2, No.3, pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2002.2.4.01
  8. Katagiri, M. and Takemura, J. (1998), '2. Test programme', Centrifuge 98, Vol.2, pp.1091-1094
  9. Kuebris, R. and Vaid, Y. P. (1988), 'Sand sample preparation-the slurry deposition method', Soils and Foundations, Vol.28, No.4, pp.107-118
  10. Ladd, S. R. (1974), 'Specimen preparation and liquefaction of sands', Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.100, GT10, pp.1180-1184
  11. Mulilis, J. P., Arulanandan, K., Mitchell, J. K., Chan, C. K. and Seed, H. B. (1977), 'Effects of sample preparation on sand liquefaction', Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.103, No.GT2, pp.91-108
  12. Park, S.-S. and Byrne, P.M. (2004), 'Stress densification and its evaluation', Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.41, No.1, pp.181-186 https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-076
  13. Schofield, A. N. (1980), 'Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations', Geotechnique, Vol.30, No.3, pp.227-268 https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.227
  14. Sharp, M. K., Dobry, R., and Abdoun, T. (2003), 'Liquefaction centrifuge modeling of sands of different permeability', Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.129, No.12, pp.1083-1091 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1083)
  15. Sriskandakumar, S. (2004), 'Cyclic loading response of Fraser River sand for validation of numerical models simulating centrifuge tests', MASc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia
  16. Taboada, V. M. and Dobry, R. (1993), 'Experimental results of Model No 1 at RPI', Proceedings of the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, pp.3-17
  17. Vaid, Y. P, Sivathayalan, S. and Stedman, D. (1999), 'Influence of specimen-reconstituting method on the undrained response of sand', Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.22, No.3, pp.187-195 https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11110J