DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Surface Energy and Roughness on Adhesion Force

표면에너지와 거칠기가 응착력에 미치는 영향

  • 나종주 (한국기계연구원 표면기술연구센터) ;
  • 권식철 (한국기계연구원 표면기술연구센터) ;
  • 정용수 (한국기계연구원 표면기술연구센터)
  • Published : 2006.11.01

Abstract

Surface energies calculated from measured contact angles between several solutions and test samples, such as Si wafer, $Al_2O_3$, $SiO_2$, PTFE(Polytertrafluoroethylene), and DLC(Diamond Like Carbon) films, based on geometric mean method and Lewis acid base method. In order to relate roughness to adhesion force, surface roughness of test samples were scanned large area and small by AFM(Atomic Force Microscopy). Roughness was representative of test samples in large scan area and comparable with AFM tip radius in small scan area. Adhesion forces between AFM tip and test samples were matched well with order of roughness rather then surface energy. When AFM tips having different radius were used to measure adhesion force on DLCI film, sharper AFM tip was, smaller adhesion force was measured. Therefore contact area was more important factor to determine adhesion force.

Keywords

References

  1. Roya Maboudian, 1998, Surface Science Reports, Vol. 30, pp. 207-269 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(97)00014-9
  2. Roya Maboudian, and Roger Howe, T. 1997, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1116/1.589247
  3. Bradley K. Smith, Jeffry J. Sniegowski, Glenn LaVigne, and Craig Brown, 1998, Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 70, pp. 159-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(98)00127-7
  4. Fuller, K. N. G. and Tabor, D., 1975, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 345, pp. 327-342 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1975.0138
  5. Yufeng, L. and Menon, A. K., 1995, Trans. ASME. J. Tribology, Vol. 117, pp. 279-284 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2831243
  6. Alley, R. L., Mai, P., Komvopoulos, K. and Howe, R. T., 1993, Proc. Transducer '93, Yokohama, Japan, 7-10 June, pp. 288-291
  7. Yee, Y., Chun, K., Lee, J. D. and Kim, C. J., 1996, Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 52, pp. 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(96)80140-3
  8. Ando, Y. and Ino, J., 1996, Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 57, pp. 83-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(97)80098-2
  9. Zizrnan, W. A., 1963, Advances in Chemical Series, Vol. 28, pp. 1-50
  10. Trojan, K., Grischke, M. and Dirnigen, H., 1994, Phys. stat. sol. (a), Vol. 145, pp. 575-585 https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2211450242
  11. Balkenende, A. R., A.P., H. J., van de Boogaard, Scholten, M. and Willard, N.P., 1998, Langmuir, Vol. 14, pp. 5907-5912 https://doi.org/10.1021/la9801110
  12. Israelachvili, J. N. and Tabor, D., 1972, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 331, pp. 19-38 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1972.0162
  13. Rabinovich, Y. I., Adler, J. J., Ata, A., Sing, R. K. and Moudgil, B. M., 2000, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 232, pp. 10-16 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.7167
  14. Rabinovich, Y. I., Adler, J. J., Ata, A., Sing, R. K. and Moudgil, B. M., 2000, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 232, pp. 17-24 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.7168
  15. Beach, E. R., Tormoen, G. W., Drelich, J. and Han, R., 2002, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 247, pp. 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.8126
  16. Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K. and Roberts, A. D., 1971, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 324, pp. 301-313 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1971.0141
  17. Derjagui, B. V., Muller, V. M. and Toporov, Y. P., 1975, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 53, pp. 314-326 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1
  18. Bharat Bhushan. 1999, Wear Vol. 225-229, pp. 465-492 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00018-6
  19. Robert W. Carpick, and Miquel Salmeron. ?1997, Chern. Rev. Vol. 97, pp. 1163-1194 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr960068q
  20. Liu, E., Blanpain, B. and Ceils, J. P., 1996, Wear, Vol. 192, pp. 141-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06784-1
  21. Garcia-Parajo, M., Longo, C., Servat, J., ?Gorostiza, P. and Sanz, F., 1997, Langmuir, Vol. 13, pp. 2333-2339 https://doi.org/10.1021/la960523d
  22. Suh, Nam P., 1986, Tribophysics, Prentice-Hall Press

Cited by

  1. Plasma on Surface Characteristics vol.49, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12772/TSE.2012.49.5.314
  2. Plasma Treatment on the Hydrophilic/hydrophobic Contrast of Film Substrates vol.50, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12772/TSE.2013.50.266
  3. Plasma vol.52, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12772/TSE.2015.52.215